Fair Source License is not a FLOSS license
according to .github/CONTRIBUTING.md, the main list must only contain Free Software. Fair Source License does not meet any authoritative definition of FLOSS (FSF, Debian, OSI) In their words: "The Fair Source License is not an open-source license and doesn’t intend to be an open-source license."
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									bb42861a87
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						4bdd8a58a4
					
				|  | @ -1324,7 +1324,6 @@ See also [Documentation Generators](#documentation-generators), [Wikimatrix](htt | ||||||
| - `DPL` - [Devblocks Public License 1.0](https://cerb.ai/license/) | - `DPL` - [Devblocks Public License 1.0](https://cerb.ai/license/) | ||||||
| - `ECL-2.0` - [Educational Community License, Version 2.0 ](http://opensource.org/licenses/ECL-2.0) | - `ECL-2.0` - [Educational Community License, Version 2.0 ](http://opensource.org/licenses/ECL-2.0) | ||||||
| - `EPL-1.0` - [Eclipse Public License, Version 1.0](https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html) | - `EPL-1.0` - [Eclipse Public License, Version 1.0](https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html) | ||||||
| - `Fair` - [Fair License](https://fair.io/) |  | ||||||
| - `GPL-1.0` - [GNU General Public License](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-1.0) | - `GPL-1.0` - [GNU General Public License](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-1.0) | ||||||
| - `GPL-2.0` - [GNU General Public License 2.0](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.en.html) | - `GPL-2.0` - [GNU General Public License 2.0](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.en.html) | ||||||
| - `GPL-3.0` - [GNU General Public License 3.0](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html) | - `GPL-3.0` - [GNU General Public License 3.0](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html) | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue