Merge 01571e81ef into 4ea31c1bc9
This commit is contained in:
commit
61513ded28
|
|
@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ impl PermissionPolicy {
|
|||
|
||||
if allow_rule.is_some()
|
||||
|| current_mode == PermissionMode::Allow
|
||||
|| current_mode >= required_mode
|
||||
|| (current_mode != PermissionMode::Prompt && current_mode >= required_mode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return PermissionOutcome::Allow;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -587,6 +587,38 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn prompt_mode_routes_to_prompter_instead_of_auto_allowing() {
|
||||
// Regression: `Prompt` sorts above `DangerFullAccess` in the
|
||||
// `PermissionMode` `Ord` derivation, so the `current_mode >= required_mode`
|
||||
// ladder check used to auto-allow every tool in `Prompt` mode and never
|
||||
// invoke the prompter — defeating the entire purpose of the mode.
|
||||
let policy = PermissionPolicy::new(PermissionMode::Prompt)
|
||||
.with_tool_requirement("read_file", PermissionMode::ReadOnly);
|
||||
let mut prompter = RecordingPrompter {
|
||||
seen: Vec::new(),
|
||||
allow: true,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let outcome = policy.authorize("read_file", "{}", Some(&mut prompter));
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(outcome, PermissionOutcome::Allow);
|
||||
assert_eq!(prompter.seen.len(), 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(prompter.seen[0].tool_name, "read_file");
|
||||
assert_eq!(prompter.seen[0].current_mode, PermissionMode::Prompt);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn prompt_mode_denies_when_no_prompter_is_available() {
|
||||
let policy = PermissionPolicy::new(PermissionMode::Prompt)
|
||||
.with_tool_requirement("read_file", PermissionMode::ReadOnly);
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(matches!(
|
||||
policy.authorize("read_file", "{}", None),
|
||||
PermissionOutcome::Deny { .. }
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn applies_rule_based_denials_and_allows() {
|
||||
let rules = RuntimePermissionRuleConfig::new(
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue