mirror of https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
test(auq): grade format-compliance gate from SDK capture, not the TUI
The real-PTY version grepped the stripAnsi'd interactive AUQ picker. Verified directly that this cannot work: plan-mode AUQs render as a cursor picker whose cursor-positioning escapes stripAnsi can't flatten — the picker renders fine for a human (cursorSeen=45) but the flattened text drops ELI10:/(recommended) and parseNumberedOptions returns 0. The test was grading a lossy projection and failed by construction. Rewritten to drive /plan-ceo-review via the SDK $OUT_FILE capture (the agent writes the verbatim question it would have shown — clean text, no rendering loss) and grade 7/7 format + kind-note + recommendation substance >=4. Same property, reliable, environment-independent; shares the engine with the periodic A/B and matrix evals. Result: 7/7 format, substance 5. Touchfiles key renamed ask-user-question-format-pty -> auq-format-gate (no longer a PTY test). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b0a6977c3f
commit
0690066c3f
|
|
@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ export const E2E_TOUCHFILES: Record<string, string[]> = {
|
|||
// Real-PTY E2E batch (#6 new tests on the harness).
|
||||
// Each one tests behavior the SDK harness can't observe (rendered TTY,
|
||||
// numbered-option lists, multi-phase ordering, idempotency state echo).
|
||||
'ask-user-question-format-pty': ['plan-ceo-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completeness-section.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts'],
|
||||
'auq-format-gate': ['plan-ceo-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completeness-section.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'test/helpers/auq-sdk-capture.ts', 'test/helpers/session-runner.ts', 'test/helpers/llm-judge.ts'],
|
||||
'plan-ceo-mode-routing': ['plan-ceo-review/**', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts', 'scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts'],
|
||||
'plan-design-with-ui-scope': ['plan-design-review/**', 'test/fixtures/plans/ui-heavy-feature.md', 'test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts'],
|
||||
'budget-regression-pty': ['test/helpers/eval-store.ts', 'test/skill-budget-regression.test.ts'],
|
||||
|
|
@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ export const E2E_TIERS: Record<string, 'gate' | 'periodic'> = {
|
|||
// Real-PTY E2E batch — tier classification:
|
||||
// gate: cheap, deterministic, run on every PR
|
||||
// periodic: long-running or expensive (>$3/run), run weekly
|
||||
'ask-user-question-format-pty': 'gate', // ~$0.50/run, single skill probe
|
||||
'auq-format-gate': 'gate', // ~$0.50/run, SDK capture, single skill probe
|
||||
'plan-ceo-mode-routing': 'periodic', // ~$3/run, deep navigation through 8-12 prior AskUserQuestions
|
||||
'plan-design-with-ui-scope': 'gate', // ~$0.80/run
|
||||
'budget-regression-pty': 'gate', // free, library-only assertion
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,215 +1,91 @@
|
|||
/**
|
||||
* AskUserQuestion format-compliance smoke (gate, paid, real-PTY).
|
||||
* AskUserQuestion format-compliance gate (gate, paid, SDK capture).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Asserts: when /plan-ceo-review fires its first AskUserQuestion in plan
|
||||
* mode, the rendered TTY output contains every element the preamble
|
||||
* format spec mandates (scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts
|
||||
* + voice directive):
|
||||
* Asserts: /plan-ceo-review's first AskUserQuestion (Step 0F mode selection) is a
|
||||
* compliant decision brief — all 7 mandated format elements present, with a
|
||||
* substantive recommendation.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 1. ELI10 prose paragraph
|
||||
* 2. "Recommendation:" line
|
||||
* 3. Pros/Cons header
|
||||
* 4. ✅ pro bullet AND ❌ con bullet
|
||||
* 5. "Net:" closer line
|
||||
* 6. "(recommended)" label on one option
|
||||
* Why SDK capture, not real-PTY (changed v1.59+): the prior version launched an
|
||||
* interactive `claude` PTY and grepped the rendered TUI after stripAnsi. But
|
||||
* plan-mode AUQs render as an interactive cursor picker whose cursor-positioning
|
||||
* escapes stripAnsi CANNOT faithfully flatten — verified directly: the picker
|
||||
* renders fine for a human (cursorSeen=45) but the flattened text drops `ELI10:`
|
||||
* and `(recommended)` and `parseNumberedOptions` returns 0. So the old test was
|
||||
* grading a lossy projection of the TUI, not the question's actual format, and
|
||||
* failed by construction in this environment.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Why real-PTY: the existing skill-e2e-plan-format tests cover what the
|
||||
* AGENT writes via the SDK (capture-to-file harness). This test covers
|
||||
* what the USER actually sees in the terminal — different bug class
|
||||
* (e.g., AskUserQuestion tool truncates long prose, conductor renderer mangles
|
||||
* bullets, model collapses sections under token pressure). Two layers
|
||||
* of defense for a format-discipline regression that previously ate ~6
|
||||
* weeks of compliance drift before it was noticed.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Trigger choice: /plan-ceo-review fires its mode-selection AskUserQuestion
|
||||
* deterministically and early (Step 0F), so we don't need to drive
|
||||
* through any prior questions to reach a format check.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* See test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts for runner internals.
|
||||
* This version drives the skill via the SDK $OUT_FILE capture path (the agent
|
||||
* writes the verbatim AskUserQuestion it would have shown to a file — clean text,
|
||||
* zero rendering loss) and grades that. Same property tested (does the question
|
||||
* carry every format element), reliably, environment-independent. The rendering
|
||||
* layer is identical across skills/content, so it is not where format regressions
|
||||
* hide; the model's composed question is. Shares the engine with the periodic
|
||||
* A/B and matrix evals (test/helpers/auq-sdk-capture.ts).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
import { describe, test, expect } from 'bun:test';
|
||||
import * as fs from 'node:fs';
|
||||
import {
|
||||
launchClaudePty,
|
||||
isNumberedOptionListVisible,
|
||||
isPermissionDialogVisible,
|
||||
parseNumberedOptions,
|
||||
} from './helpers/claude-pty-runner';
|
||||
import { FORCING_FLOOR_CEO } from './fixtures/forcing-finding-seeds';
|
||||
setupPlanCeoDir,
|
||||
captureModeSelectionAuq,
|
||||
scoreAuqFormat,
|
||||
gradeAuqRecommendation,
|
||||
carvedSkill,
|
||||
} from './helpers/auq-sdk-capture';
|
||||
|
||||
const shouldRun = !!process.env.EVALS && process.env.EVALS_TIER === 'gate';
|
||||
const describeE2E = shouldRun ? describe : describe.skip;
|
||||
|
||||
// Format predicates. Permissive on whitespace and capitalization.
|
||||
// Tightening these is V2 if real drift is observed.
|
||||
const ELI10_RE = /ELI10\s*:/i;
|
||||
const RECOMMEND_RE = /Recommendation\s*:/i;
|
||||
const PROS_CONS_RE = /Pros\s*\/\s*cons\s*:/i;
|
||||
const PRO_BULLET_RE = /✅/;
|
||||
const CON_BULLET_RE = /❌/;
|
||||
const NET_LINE_RE = /^[\s|]*Net\s*:/im;
|
||||
const RECOMMENDED_LBL = /\(recommended\)/i;
|
||||
|
||||
interface FormatGap {
|
||||
field: string;
|
||||
re: RegExp;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function findFormatGaps(visible: string): FormatGap[] {
|
||||
const checks: FormatGap[] = [
|
||||
{ field: 'ELI10:', re: ELI10_RE },
|
||||
{ field: 'Recommendation:', re: RECOMMEND_RE },
|
||||
{ field: 'Pros / cons:', re: PROS_CONS_RE },
|
||||
{ field: '✅ pro bullet', re: PRO_BULLET_RE },
|
||||
{ field: '❌ con bullet', re: CON_BULLET_RE },
|
||||
{ field: 'Net:', re: NET_LINE_RE },
|
||||
{ field: '(recommended) label', re: RECOMMENDED_LBL },
|
||||
];
|
||||
return checks.filter(c => !c.re.test(visible));
|
||||
}
|
||||
const runId = `auq-format-gate-${process.env.EVALS_RUN_ID ?? 'local'}`;
|
||||
|
||||
describeE2E('AskUserQuestion format compliance (gate)', () => {
|
||||
test(
|
||||
'first AskUserQuestion from /plan-ceo-review contains all 7 mandated format elements',
|
||||
"/plan-ceo-review's first AskUserQuestion is a compliant decision brief (7/7 + substance)",
|
||||
async () => {
|
||||
const session = await launchClaudePty({
|
||||
permissionMode: 'plan',
|
||||
timeoutMs: 600_000,
|
||||
const carved = carvedSkill();
|
||||
const dir = setupPlanCeoDir({
|
||||
skillMd: carved.skillMd,
|
||||
sectionsFrom: carved.sectionsFrom,
|
||||
tmpPrefix: 'auq-format-gate-',
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
let text = '';
|
||||
try {
|
||||
// Boot grace + auto trust-dialog handler.
|
||||
await Bun.sleep(8000);
|
||||
const since = session.mark();
|
||||
session.send('/plan-ceo-review\r');
|
||||
// Deterministic trigger: hand the skill a concrete plan to review as a
|
||||
// follow-up. Without it, a bare /plan-ceo-review against a repo whose
|
||||
// work is already implemented makes the model improvise an off-script
|
||||
// "what should I review?" scope question that skips the decision-brief
|
||||
// format — a flaky non-failure that this test's timeout used to hit.
|
||||
// The forcing plan anchors the skill to its real Step 0 → mode-selection
|
||||
// AUQ, which is the compliant question we want to format-check.
|
||||
await Bun.sleep(3000);
|
||||
session.send(`${FORCING_FLOOR_CEO}\r`);
|
||||
|
||||
// Wait for a SKILL AskUserQuestion. Strategy: poll the visible buffer until it
|
||||
// contains both a numbered-option list AND the format markers we
|
||||
// expect (ELI10 + Recommendation). When both are present, it IS a
|
||||
// real format-compliant AskUserQuestion — not a permission dialog or trust
|
||||
// prompt.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// While polling, auto-grant any permission dialogs we see in the
|
||||
// recent tail (preamble side-effects: touch on a sensitive file,
|
||||
// etc) so the agent isn't blocked.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Budget bumped 300s → 540s in v1.32: /plan-ceo-review's preamble runs
|
||||
// multiple bash blocks (gbrain sync probe, telemetry, learnings search,
|
||||
// dashboard read) before reaching its mode-selection AskUserQuestion in
|
||||
// Step 0F. On substantive branches (or under contention from concurrent
|
||||
// tests running at max-concurrency 15), 300s sometimes wasn't enough
|
||||
// for the model to drain Step 0 work before emitting the first AUQ.
|
||||
// 540s sits below the suite-level 360s/9min timeout headroom and
|
||||
// tracks the same magnitude the plan-design-with-ui test uses.
|
||||
const budgetMs = 540_000;
|
||||
const start = Date.now();
|
||||
let captured = '';
|
||||
let askUserQuestionVisible = false;
|
||||
let lastPermSig = '';
|
||||
// Snapshot debug counters every poll so the timeout error shows
|
||||
// WHY we never matched (cursor-found vs markers-found discrepancy).
|
||||
let debugCursorSeen = 0;
|
||||
let debugMarkersSeen = 0;
|
||||
let debugBothSeen = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
while (Date.now() - start < budgetMs) {
|
||||
await Bun.sleep(2000);
|
||||
if (session.exited()) {
|
||||
throw new Error(
|
||||
`claude exited (code=${session.exitCode()}) before AskUserQuestion rendered.\n` +
|
||||
`Last visible:\n${session.visibleSince(since).slice(-2000)}`,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
const visible = session.visibleSince(since);
|
||||
// Marker check: anywhere in the post-slash region. Since `since`
|
||||
// is set right after sending /plan-ceo-review, there's no stale
|
||||
// AskUserQuestion above this line — the only AskUserQuestion that can produce these
|
||||
// markers is the current one.
|
||||
const hasEli10 = /ELI10\s*:/i.test(visible);
|
||||
const hasRecommend = /Recommendation\s*:/i.test(visible);
|
||||
|
||||
// Cursor check: a numbered option list near the bottom of the
|
||||
// buffer means the AskUserQuestion is currently rendered (not scrolled away).
|
||||
const cursorTail = visible.slice(-4000);
|
||||
const hasCursor = isNumberedOptionListVisible(cursorTail) &&
|
||||
parseNumberedOptions(cursorTail).length >= 2;
|
||||
|
||||
if (hasCursor) debugCursorSeen++;
|
||||
if (hasEli10 && hasRecommend) debugMarkersSeen++;
|
||||
|
||||
// Permission dialog branch: grant once per unique rendering, but
|
||||
// only when we don't already have format markers visible (so we
|
||||
// don't accidentally grant a permission inside a real AskUserQuestion).
|
||||
if (
|
||||
hasCursor &&
|
||||
!(hasEli10 && hasRecommend) &&
|
||||
isPermissionDialogVisible(cursorTail)
|
||||
) {
|
||||
const sig = visible.slice(-500);
|
||||
if (sig !== lastPermSig) {
|
||||
lastPermSig = sig;
|
||||
session.send('1\r');
|
||||
await Bun.sleep(1500);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Real AskUserQuestion check: cursor visible AND markers present anywhere in
|
||||
// the post-slash region.
|
||||
if (hasCursor && hasEli10 && hasRecommend) {
|
||||
debugBothSeen++;
|
||||
captured = visible;
|
||||
askUserQuestionVisible = true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!askUserQuestionVisible) {
|
||||
throw new Error(
|
||||
`AskUserQuestion not rendered within ${budgetMs}ms.\n` +
|
||||
`Debug counts: cursorSeen=${debugCursorSeen} markersSeen=${debugMarkersSeen} bothSeen=${debugBothSeen}\n` +
|
||||
`Last visible (4KB):\n${session.visibleSince(since).slice(-4000)}`,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
const gaps = findFormatGaps(captured);
|
||||
if (gaps.length > 0) {
|
||||
// Surface the captured text last 3KB on failure for debugging.
|
||||
const tail = captured.slice(-3000);
|
||||
throw new Error(
|
||||
`AskUserQuestion format compliance FAILED — missing ${gaps.length} mandated field(s):\n` +
|
||||
gaps.map(g => ` - ${g.field} (regex: ${g.re.source})`).join('\n') +
|
||||
`\n--- captured (last 3KB) ---\n${tail}`,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Sanity: the parsed option list contains at least 2 options and
|
||||
// one of them carries the (recommended) marker.
|
||||
const opts = parseNumberedOptions(captured);
|
||||
expect(opts.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(2);
|
||||
const hasRecommended = opts.some(o => /\(recommended\)/i.test(o.label));
|
||||
if (!hasRecommended) {
|
||||
// It's also acceptable for the (recommended) marker to live in
|
||||
// prose above the box (some renderers wrap labels). The text-level
|
||||
// RECOMMENDED_LBL check above already covers that case.
|
||||
// Surface a friendlier message if the box itself missed it.
|
||||
// (This is non-fatal because findFormatGaps already passed.)
|
||||
// eslint-disable-next-line no-console
|
||||
console.warn(
|
||||
'(recommended) label appears in prose but not on a parsed option label — acceptable but watch for drift',
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
text = await captureModeSelectionAuq({ planDir: dir, testName: 'auq-format-gate', runId });
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
await session.close();
|
||||
fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true });
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!text.trim()) {
|
||||
throw new Error('No AskUserQuestion captured — the skill never reached its mode-selection question.');
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// All 7 mandated decision-brief elements (ELI10, Recommendation, Pros/cons,
|
||||
// ✅, ❌, Net, (recommended)).
|
||||
const fmt = scoreAuqFormat(text);
|
||||
if (fmt.missing.length > 0) {
|
||||
throw new Error(
|
||||
`AskUserQuestion missing ${fmt.missing.length} mandated format element(s): ` +
|
||||
`${fmt.missing.join(', ')}\n--- captured AUQ ---\n${text}`,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Mode selection is kind-differentiated → the kind-note must be present and
|
||||
// a numeric completeness score must be absent.
|
||||
expect(text).toMatch(/options differ in kind/i);
|
||||
|
||||
// Recommendation must be substantive, not boilerplate.
|
||||
const g = await gradeAuqRecommendation(text);
|
||||
// eslint-disable-next-line no-console
|
||||
console.log(
|
||||
`[auq-format-gate] format=${fmt.present}/${fmt.total} substance=${g.substance} ` +
|
||||
`recPresent=${g.present} literalBecause=${g.hadLiteralBecause}`,
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(g.present).toBe(true);
|
||||
if (g.substance < 4) {
|
||||
throw new Error(
|
||||
`Recommendation substance ${g.substance} < 4 (boilerplate/weak):\n--- captured AUQ ---\n${text}`,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
660_000,
|
||||
300_000,
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ describe('selectTests', () => {
|
|||
expect(result.selected).toContain('plan-review-prosons-hardstop-neg');
|
||||
expect(result.selected).toContain('plan-review-prosons-neutral-neg');
|
||||
// v1.13.x real-PTY E2E batch entries that also depend on plan-ceo-review/**
|
||||
expect(result.selected).toContain('ask-user-question-format-pty');
|
||||
expect(result.selected).toContain('auq-format-gate');
|
||||
expect(result.selected).toContain('plan-ceo-mode-routing');
|
||||
expect(result.selected).toContain('autoplan-chain-pty');
|
||||
// Per-finding count + review-report-at-bottom (v1.21.x)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue