mirror of https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
docs: file the systemic in-shard-concurrency follow-up behind the timeout-flake family
This commit is contained in:
parent
308f19c4f8
commit
e41dffbfd8
15
TODOS.md
15
TODOS.md
|
|
@ -2418,6 +2418,21 @@ by shard parallelism; the per-file wall cost remains.
|
|||
**Where:** test/gstack-gbrain-detect-mcp-mode.test.ts.
|
||||
**Effort:** S (human ~2h, CC ~15min).
|
||||
|
||||
### P2: In-shard eval concurrency (40) is the shared root of the timeout-flake family
|
||||
|
||||
**What:** Every timeout-flake member on PR #2593 (document-release 180s->300s,
|
||||
review-dashboard-via 300s->360s after PR #2472's 180s->300s, retro-base-branch
|
||||
240s->360s) shares one story: claude session STARTUP queues behind up to 39
|
||||
siblings under evals.yml's `--max-concurrency 40`, eating the per-test budget
|
||||
before the first turn. Per-test ratchets treat symptoms. Systemic options:
|
||||
(a) drop in-shard concurrency to ~15-20 and measure the wall-clock cost,
|
||||
(b) startup-aware budgets (start the timer at first turn, not spawn),
|
||||
(c) per-row concurrency overrides like the retries field. Receipts: the
|
||||
PR #2593 flake ledger comment.
|
||||
**Where:** .github/workflows/evals.yml:309 (--max-concurrency 40);
|
||||
test/helpers/session-runner.ts (budget start point).
|
||||
**Effort:** M (human ~1d, CC ~45min + measurement rounds).
|
||||
|
||||
### P2: plan-design-review scope-gate detector is marginal under CI contention
|
||||
|
||||
**What:** `plan-design-review reaches a terminal outcome outside plan mode`
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue