Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Garry Tan 19cb4062c2
test: final coverage pass — CLI rendering, revert traps, keychain probe, gbrain doc ops
The user-directed third generation pass closes the audit's remaining
tail: the code-intelligence CLI's options/status/suggest surfaces get
behavioral coverage through the fake-shim chain; brain-context-load
gains an argv-logging trap that goes red if anyone reverts the memoized
PATH scan back to the spawn probe (receipt: simulated revert failed
exactly these tests); the darwin Keychain auth branch (#1890) gets its
first free-tier tests via a PATH-shimmed security binary; and the gbrain
add/delete/export ops are pinned (body piped byte-for-byte, receipt
sha256, stdin-EOF prompt guard, PROVIDER_UNAVAILABLE degradation) —
retiring their TODOS entry.
2026-08-15 07:36:58 -07:00
Garry Tan a64106535b
fix(code-intelligence): gbrain search/export are consent-gated and receipted
The Sourcebot side got this in the last round; gbrain had the same hole —
search() and export() sent repo-derived query text into a possibly-remote
DATABASE_URL with no consent check and no egress receipt, bypassing the
deny-tier veto. Both now assert consent before any bytes move, receipts
record the actual consent state (never a hardcoded true), and search
receipts carry the query's sha256. gbrain stays fail-closed: the adapter
cannot see where DATABASE_URL points, so every send requires consent.
7 new tests, red-first.
2026-08-14 21:04:18 -07:00
Garry Tan 9488173b0a
fix(code-intelligence): consent that means what it says — polarity, receipts, read-only veto
Four review findings on the wave's own Phase 1 port, all red-first:
'consent <repo> no' recorded consent GRANTED (the CLI ignored the
argument and always wrote true) — yes|no is now required and garbage
records nothing; Sourcebot egress receipts claimed consented=true on
paths that never checked consent — the actual consent state is threaded
into every receipt, search is fail-closed on non-loopback, and the
liveness probe's receipt says truthfully that it sends no repo content;
repoPolicyVeto only honored the deny tier while gbrain refresh writes
pages — write-class ops now veto on read-only too, matching the sync
chokepoint, via one shared lib/gbrain-repo-policy-client.ts (win32
bash invocation, spawn-vs-unreadable error distinction) used by both
call sites. Also: source ids get a host+path hash (same-name repos no
longer collide), refresh timeout raised to 120s, availability probes
run concurrently at 3s, graphify status stops JSON.parsing 100MB graphs
for a count, and every ported file carries the fork MIT notice.
+15 tests across the two suites.
2026-08-14 17:13:22 -07:00
Garry Tan 3aba218303
feat(code-intelligence): provider contract Phase 1 — GBrain, Sourcebot, Graphify behind one ask-once offer
Open a large repo (1,000+ tracked files) and gstack can offer code
intelligence ONCE, with the trade-offs stated: GBrain (semantic memory +
code, sends content to YOUR gbrain DB, per-repo consent), Sourcebot
(self-hosted whole-repo search, local on localhost), Graphify (local
tree-sitter graph, nothing leaves the machine, user-installed), or No
indexing — a decline persists machine-wide so no skill ever asks again.
Small repos never see the question; grep stays the always-working default
and provider-OFF degrades silently (PROVIDER_UNAVAILABLE -> file-only).

Ported: lib/code-intelligence/ (contract + 3 verified adapters + picker +
selection + suggest, MIT headers), the gstack-code-intelligence CLI
(suggest/select/consent/index/search/status), 31 offline tests (fake CLI
shims + injected fetch), and the provider-contract design doc. Verified
live on this repo: suggest fires at 1,233 files with real availability
detail per provider.

Hardened per review: the per-remote trust store is the SINGLE consent
authority — a gstack-gbrain-repo-policy deny tier vetoes any recorded
code-intelligence consent (fail-closed on an unreadable store, pinned by
three tests); both send-capable adapters are registered as fail-closed
MODULE_SINKS in the egress tripwire so a refactor can't drop their
receipts; and local-compute vs remote-send consents are never bundled.
setup-gbrain gains the provider-choice Step 0. The fork's Phases 2-4
glue-collapse is explicitly NOT ported.

Ported from time-attack/gstack (GStack 2); consent unification ours.

Co-authored-by: Sina Matian <sina@time-attack.dev>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 13:15:03 -07:00