mirror of https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
3 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
e82efc0d38
|
feat(preamble): inject <gstack-qid:...> marker convention into question-tuning resolver
Plan-tune cathedral T14. Per D18 progressive markers, the PreToolUse
enforcement hook only fires when the AUQ question text contains a
<gstack-qid:foo-bar> marker the hook can extract. Without a marker, the
hook logs the fire as observed-only and skips enforcement (hash IDs drift
with prose so they're never used as preference keys).
The high-leverage retrofit point is the preamble's Question Tuning section,
not 10 individual skill templates. Updating scripts/resolvers/question-tuning.ts
adds the marker convention to every tier-≥2 skill in one change — agents
running ANY of the 30+ tier-≥2 skills now embed the marker by default when
the question matches a registered question_id.
Two convention additions in the preamble:
1. "Embed the question_id as a marker (<gstack-qid:{id}>) somewhere in the
rendered question." With explanation that the marker is the only path
for the PreToolUse hook to enforce preferences.
2. "Embed the option recommendation via the (recommended) label suffix on
exactly one option per AUQ." Documents the D2 parser contract: label
first, prose fallback, refuse-on-ambiguous.
Net cost: ~700 bytes added to the preamble per generated skill. Plan-review
preamble budget ratcheted from 39000 → 40000 (test/gen-skill-docs.test.ts)
with a comment explaining the cathedral T14 expansion is load-bearing.
Regenerated 42 SKILL.md files via `bun run gen:skill-docs`. The token
ceiling warning on ship/SKILL.md (~41K tokens) is pre-existing; this PR
doesn't change ship's preamble materially.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|
|
|
a6fb31726c
|
v1.48.0.0 feat: AskUserQuestion split rule + runtime AUTO_DECIDE carve-out (#1740)
* feat(preamble): add "Handling 5+ options — split, never drop" rule Agents repeatedly hit Conductor's 4-option AskUserQuestion cap and silently drop one option to fit, shrinking the user's decision space. This rule names the bug and gives two compliant shapes: batch into ≤4-groups (for coherent alternatives) or split into N sequential per-option calls (for independent scope items, default). Inline preamble subsection is ~15 lines (rule + buckets + pointer). Full reference with worked examples, Hold/dependency semantics, and final-summary validation lives in docs/askuserquestion-split.md. The agent loads the docs file on demand when N>4. Per-option call shape: D<N>.k header, ELI10, Recommendation, kind-note (no completeness score — decision actions, not coverage), Include / Defer / Cut / Hold buckets. Hold stops the chain immediately; the final D<N>.final call validates dependencies and confirms the assembled scope. question_ids: <skill>-split-<option-slug> (kebab-case ASCII, ≤64 chars). Also fixes orphan "12. " prefix on the existing CJK rule. Tier-2+ skills inherit via the existing resolver. SKILL.md regenerated for all 41 affected skills + 3 golden fixtures. Net diff per SKILL.md: ~34 lines (vs ~110 for the full inline version). 6 tests pin the inline contract (4-option cap, buckets, D-numbering, docs pointer, runtime AUTO_DECIDE gate reference, orphan 12 regression). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(question-pref): runtime AUTO_DECIDE carve-out for *-split-* ids Split chains (per-option AskUserQuestion calls emitted by the new "Handling 5+ options" rule) must never be silently auto-approved via /plan-tune preferences. The user's option set is sacred. Layer 1 (mechanism): unique <skill>-split-<option-slug> ids prevent cross-option preference leakage. Layer 2 (this commit): the runtime checker `gstack-question-preference --check` detects any id matching *-split-* and forces ASK_NORMALLY even when never-ask or ask-only-for-one-way preferences exist for that exact id. An explanatory note tells the user their preference was bypassed and why. 7 tests pin the carve-out: no-pref baseline, never-ask override, explanatory note text, ask-only-for-one-way override, always-ask (no note), non-split id containing "split" word (negative case for regex specificity), multi-skill split id formats. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(e2e): split-overflow regression for /plan-ceo-review Periodic-tier E2E test that catches the original failure mode the user complained about: 5+ options for ONE decision must split into N sequential AskUserQuestion calls, not drop one to fit Conductor's 4-option cap. Fixture: 5 independent chat-platform integration candidates (Slack/Discord/Teams/Telegram/Mattermost), each carrying its own include/defer/cut decision. Floor = 4 review-phase AUQs (standard [N-1] tolerance band). Pre-fix "drop to 4 + 1 dropped" fails this floor. Wired into test/helpers/touchfiles.ts: tier periodic, depends on plan-ceo-review/**, the new preamble subsection, the question-pref binary (for the carve-out), and the runner helper. touchfiles.test.ts expected count bumped 21 → 22 to account for the new entry. Cost: ~$0.30/run when EVALS_TIER=periodic. Skips silently otherwise. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: post-merge regen + rebase size-budget baseline to v1.47.0.0 After merging origin/main (v1.45 → v1.47), three things needed cleanup: 1. spec/SKILL.md (main's new skill) regenerated to include our split-vs-drop preamble subsection — same mechanical regen as the other 41 tier-2+ skills. 2. Three golden ship fixtures refreshed to capture main's GSTACK_PLAN_MODE block + /spec routing entry + jargon-list.json refactor. 3. docs/skills.md — added /spec table row that main's PR (#1698/#1733) shipped without. Pre-existing failure on main; this PR catches and fixes. Also rebased test/skill-size-budget.test.ts from v1.44.1 → v1.47.0.0 baseline. Main's v1.46 (catalog tokens trim) + v1.47 (/spec skill) pushed the v1.44.1 anchor past the 5% ratchet to ×1.059 — pre-existing failure on main. This PR captures a fresh parity-baseline-v1.47.0.0.json and re-anchors the test there. Historical v1.44.1.json and v1.46.0.0.json retained in test/fixtures/ for reference. Our subsection contributes ~0.1% of the post-rebase corpus. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: bump version and changelog (v1.48.0.0) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|
|
|
f8bb59094d
|
v1.47.0.0 feat: /spec — author backlog-ready spec in 5 phases + optional agent spawn (#1698) (#1733)
* feat(issue): add /issue skill for backlog-ready GitHub issue authoring
Interrogates an ambiguous request through five strict phases (why, scope,
technical, draft, final) and produces a GitHub issue precise enough that an
unfamiliar engineer or AI agent can execute it without follow-up. Slots in
after /office-hours (when the idea has passed the "worth building" bar) and
before /plan-eng-review (which assumes a plan already exists).
- issue/SKILL.md.tmpl + generated SKILL.md
- routing entry in root SKILL.md.tmpl
- llms.txt regenerated to include the new skill
* chore(spec): rename /issue → /spec + fix duplicate analytics block
Foundation commit for the /spec skill (extends PR #1698 by @jayzalowitz).
- Renames issue/ → spec/ (template + generated)
- Removes the hand-rolled analytics block in spec/SKILL.md.tmpl (lines 46-49 of the original); {{PREAMBLE}} already emits the analytics write with the telemetry opt-out guard, so the duplicate would have bypassed gstack-config set telemetry off
- Updates frontmatter (name: spec, expanded description with magical-moment preview, triggers reordered to lead with "spec this out")
- Updates root SKILL.md.tmpl routing entry → /spec
- Regenerates spec/SKILL.md and gstack/llms.txt via bun run gen:skill-docs
Co-Authored-By: Jay Zalowitz <jayzalowitz@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* feat(spec): expansions — flags, archive, quality gate, plan-mode-aware Phase 5, /ship integration, tests
Builds on the @jayzalowitz foundation (commit
|