Open a large repo (1,000+ tracked files) and gstack can offer code
intelligence ONCE, with the trade-offs stated: GBrain (semantic memory +
code, sends content to YOUR gbrain DB, per-repo consent), Sourcebot
(self-hosted whole-repo search, local on localhost), Graphify (local
tree-sitter graph, nothing leaves the machine, user-installed), or No
indexing — a decline persists machine-wide so no skill ever asks again.
Small repos never see the question; grep stays the always-working default
and provider-OFF degrades silently (PROVIDER_UNAVAILABLE -> file-only).
Ported: lib/code-intelligence/ (contract + 3 verified adapters + picker +
selection + suggest, MIT headers), the gstack-code-intelligence CLI
(suggest/select/consent/index/search/status), 31 offline tests (fake CLI
shims + injected fetch), and the provider-contract design doc. Verified
live on this repo: suggest fires at 1,233 files with real availability
detail per provider.
Hardened per review: the per-remote trust store is the SINGLE consent
authority — a gstack-gbrain-repo-policy deny tier vetoes any recorded
code-intelligence consent (fail-closed on an unreadable store, pinned by
three tests); both send-capable adapters are registered as fail-closed
MODULE_SINKS in the egress tripwire so a refactor can't drop their
receipts; and local-compute vs remote-send consents are never bundled.
setup-gbrain gains the provider-choice Step 0. The fork's Phases 2-4
glue-collapse is explicitly NOT ported.
Ported from time-attack/gstack (GStack 2); consent unification ours.
Co-authored-by: Sina Matian <sina@time-attack.dev>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Garry Tan