mirror of https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
Analyzed a real diagnostic session that wasted 500+ lines querying the wrong database, skipped the workflow map, jumped between hypotheses without testing, and declared confidence 8/10 without reproducing the issue. New guardrails: - "5 Deadly Sins" section: wrong database, skipping workflow map, narrative bias, premature confidence, sequential hypothesis testing - Phase 0-env: mandatory environment verification before ANY database query (print host/db, verify it matches the reported environment) - Phase 1f: "MANDATORY BEFORE ANY HYPOTHESIS" with explicit warning about the #1 failure mode (skipping the map → anchoring on first suspicious thing) - Evidence Gate 1: now a printable checklist that must include workflow map completion; "print it with answers" instruction - Anti-narrative rule in Phase 2: catch "so it must be..." reasoning - Anti-premature-convergence rules: max confidence 7 without reproduction, "what ELSE could explain this?" prompt after every suspicious finding Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| SKILL.md | ||
| SKILL.md.tmpl | ||