Benjamin D. Smith de4f62a317 feat(pr-prep): check commits against the upstream commit-message style ... Add Step 4.6: a per-commit conformance check that holds the branch's commit messages to the UPSTREAM repo's convention, not the contributor's own house style. A fork PR whose commits read in a different voice than the project reads as a drive-by and burns reviewer goodwill before the diff is read. The authoritative style is resolved once (Step 1.4): the upstream CONTRIBUTING.md commit rules if present, else the de-facto shape sampled from `git log upstream/$BASE_BRANCH --no-merges`, else the conventional-commits baseline. Step 4.6 then flags subject-shape drift, a personal body template (emoji/bullets) where upstream uses prose, a subject that promises content it lacks (e.g. "+ tests" with no tests), and a missing-or-extra trailer relative to upstream (e.g. a `Co-Authored-By:` line upstream carries on every commit). Surfaced as a soft warning in the report, never a block — style is not a duplicate, but it is the cheapest goodwill win in the audit and far cheaper to fix before the PR exists. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>		2026-07-02 21:56:31 +10:00
..
SKILL.md	feat(pr-prep): check commits against the upstream commit-message style	2026-07-02 21:56:31 +10:00
SKILL.md.tmpl	feat(pr-prep): check commits against the upstream commit-message style	2026-07-02 21:56:31 +10:00