The in-repo skill-authoring skill taught the validator's ceilings (1024-char
descriptions, 'Use when ...' phrasing) instead of the repo's review standards,
so agents following it produced skills that fail review: 240+ char
descriptions, author 'Hermes Agent' with no human credit, no bundled-vs-
optional decision, dangling related_skills, no platforms audit, no tests, no
docs regen, and machine-local /home/bb/... paths baked into prose.
Rewritten to teach the hardline standards from AGENTS.md:
- description <= 60 chars, one sentence, ends with period
- author credits the human contributor first
- bundled vs optional tier decision (5+ sessions/month bar; default optional)
- no router/index/hub skills
- platforms: audited against actual scripts, POSIX-signal table
- related_skills must resolve in-repo
- Hermes-tool framing instead of raw shell prose
- tests at tests/skills/ + docs regen with scope discipline
- removed machine-local paths; validator limits marked as NOT the standard
eb1e63090a