Profiling the boot answered "is there a real cold-start win?": no wasteful
hotspot — the renderer does only ~tens of ms of work at mount, no heavy library
(shiki/mermaid/katex/d3/motion) initializes at startup; the rest is Electron
runtime + waiting, near the Electron floor.
It also exposed that the cold-start number was pessimistic: a fresh
--user-data-dir per run means a COLD V8 code cache and worst-case bundle
recompile every launch. Real users reuse their profile. Measured delta:
fresh (cold cache): spawn→interactive ~1.48s
reused (warm cache): ~1.0s
So representative launch is ~1.0s; only first-launch-after-install pays ~+400ms.
- coldStartSamples() reuses one profile (run 0 warms the cache, discarded;
runs 1..N are warm samples), stepping ports + pausing so the single-instance
lock releases. `--cold-fresh` measures the first-launch worst case.
- Re-baselined cold-start with the representative warm numbers.
Net: nothing high-ROI left to optimize. The only lever is shipping a pre-warmed
V8 code cache to make first launch match warm (~400ms, once per update) — real
packaging complexity for a marginal win, deliberately not pursued.
8142331616