fix(deriver): keep the stated duration in the NYC residence example
The example dropped "six years" from "I've lived in NYC for six years", which contradicts the prompt's own rule to extract all observations and to contextualize each one. Emit both the residence fact and the duration. Keeping "alice lives in NYC" alongside it is deliberate: that output is the point of the example, contrasting with the preceding one where the same conclusion is *not* supported by a single visit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
aca7752850
commit
1175c3117a
|
|
@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ RULES:
|
|||
EXAMPLES (using `alice` as the target peer id):
|
||||
- EXPLICIT: "I just turned 25" → "alice is 25 years old"
|
||||
- EXPLICIT: "I took my dog for a walk in NYC" → "alice has a dog", "alice walked her dog in NYC"
|
||||
- EXPLICIT: "I've lived in NYC for six years" → "alice lives in NYC"
|
||||
- EXPLICIT: "I've lived in NYC for six years" → "alice lives in NYC", "alice has lived in NYC for six years"
|
||||
|
||||
{custom_instructions_section}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue