name: Memory / recall quality
description: Conclusions, representations, or dialectic answers are wrong, noisy, missing, or low-quality — not a hard crash.
title: "[Quality] "
labels: ["quality"]
body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: |
        Use this when Honcho runs without erroring, but **memory formation or recall quality** is off (bad conclusions, missed facts, weak chat answers, polluted representations, etc.).

        For crashes, 5xxs, auth failures, or incorrect API mechanics, use the **Bug report** template instead.

        **Do not paste production user content, full peer representations, or secrets.** Redact or invent a minimal synthetic example.

  - type: dropdown
    id: deploy_mode
    attributes:
      label: Deploy mode
      options:
        - Managed (api.honcho.dev / app.honcho.dev)
        - Self-hosted
        - Unsure
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: input
    id: version
    attributes:
      label: Honcho version
      description: Server image tag or release, and SDK version if you use one. Write "managed" if you are not self-hosting.
      placeholder: e.g. server v2.4.1, honcho-ai 2.1.0
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: description
    attributes:
      label: What is wrong with the quality?
      description: Describe the failure mode (noise, omission, contradiction, staleness, over/under-generalization, etc.).
      placeholder: After ingesting messages about X, Honcho concludes Y / chat answers Z…
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: repro
    attributes:
      label: Minimal scenario
      description: >
        Smallest synthetic message sequence or setup that triggers the issue.
        Prefer invented names/facts over real user data. Include observer/observed
        peer setup if relevant (self vs cross-peer).
      placeholder: |
        1. Peers: alice (user), bot (agent); session S
        2. Messages ingested: …
        3. Query / conclusion listing shows: …
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: config
    attributes:
      label: Relevant config
      description: >
        Custom instructions, provider/model, deriver/dream settings, or workspace/peer
        config that affects reasoning. Redact secrets.
      placeholder: |
        Provider/model: …
        Custom instructions: (summary or redacted)
        Other: …
    validations:
      required: false

  - type: textarea
    id: evidence
    attributes:
      label: Evidence
      description: Redacted conclusion text, chat excerpts, or counts that show the failure. No production PII.
    validations:
      required: false

  - type: textarea
    id: context
    attributes:
      label: Additional context
      description: Frequency, scale (message/conclusion counts), related issues, workarounds.
    validations:
      required: false