cleanup
This commit is contained in:
parent
d5e55bec06
commit
594d9a1276
|
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||
from django.apps import apps
|
||||
from django.contrib.contenttypes.fields import GenericForeignKey, GenericRelation
|
||||
from django.core.exceptions import ValidationError
|
||||
from django.db import models
|
||||
from django.db import models, router, transaction
|
||||
from django.urls import reverse
|
||||
from django.utils.translation import gettext_lazy as _
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -394,15 +394,13 @@ class CircuitTermination(
|
|||
|
||||
circuit_changed = tracking_relevant and self._orig_circuit_id and self._orig_circuit_id != self.circuit_id
|
||||
term_side_changed = tracking_relevant and self._orig_term_side and self._orig_term_side != self.term_side
|
||||
pointer_moved = is_new or circuit_changed or term_side_changed
|
||||
|
||||
# Cache objects associated with the terminating object (for filtering)
|
||||
self.cache_related_objects()
|
||||
|
||||
super().save(*args, **kwargs)
|
||||
|
||||
# Collect the pointer writes per circuit, so that a term_side change within a single
|
||||
# circuit clears the old side and sets the new one in one write rather than passing
|
||||
# through a state with neither side set
|
||||
# Collect the pointer writes per circuit, so that a term_side change within one
|
||||
# circuit clears the old side and sets the new one in a single write
|
||||
updates = {}
|
||||
|
||||
# Clear the old termination reference if circuit or term_side changed
|
||||
|
|
@ -410,57 +408,61 @@ class CircuitTermination(
|
|||
old_termination_name = f'termination_{self._orig_term_side.lower()}'
|
||||
updates.setdefault(self._orig_circuit_id, {})[old_termination_name] = None
|
||||
|
||||
# Update the cache if this is a new termination or circuit/term_side changed
|
||||
if is_new or circuit_changed or term_side_changed:
|
||||
# Update the new circuit's termination reference
|
||||
termination_name = f'termination_{self.term_side.lower()}'
|
||||
updates.setdefault(self.circuit_id, {})[termination_name] = self.pk
|
||||
# Write the termination row and the pointers which reference it together
|
||||
with transaction.atomic(using=router.db_for_write(type(self))):
|
||||
super().save(*args, **kwargs)
|
||||
|
||||
# Update cached values for subsequent saves
|
||||
self._orig_circuit_id = self.circuit_id
|
||||
self._orig_term_side = self.term_side
|
||||
# Update the cache if this is a new termination or circuit/term_side changed
|
||||
if pointer_moved:
|
||||
# Update the new circuit's termination reference
|
||||
termination_name = f'termination_{self.term_side.lower()}'
|
||||
updates.setdefault(self.circuit_id, {})[termination_name] = self.pk
|
||||
|
||||
for circuit_id, fields in updates.items():
|
||||
self._set_circuit_terminations(circuit_id, fields)
|
||||
for circuit_id, fields in updates.items():
|
||||
circuit = self._set_circuit_terminations(circuit_id, fields)
|
||||
# Keep the instance's cached Circuit in step with the write
|
||||
if circuit is not None and circuit.pk == self.circuit_id:
|
||||
self.circuit = circuit
|
||||
|
||||
# Update cached values for subsequent saves, only once the pointer writes have
|
||||
# succeeded, so that a failed save is still pending on retry
|
||||
if pointer_moved:
|
||||
self._orig_circuit_id = self.circuit_id
|
||||
self._orig_term_side = self.term_side
|
||||
|
||||
@staticmethod
|
||||
def _set_circuit_terminations(circuit_id, fields):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Point a Circuit's cached `termination_a`/`termination_z` fields at the given
|
||||
CircuitTermination PKs, or clear them. `fields` maps field name to PK (or None); both
|
||||
sides are passed together where they change at once, to keep it to a single write.
|
||||
Set or clear a Circuit's cached `termination_a`/`termination_z` fields. `fields` maps
|
||||
field name to CircuitTermination PK (or None).
|
||||
|
||||
This is written via snapshot() + save() rather than a queryset update() so that the write
|
||||
passes through post_save and is recorded in the changelog. A raw update() emits no signal,
|
||||
so consumers which replay ObjectChange records have no record of the write and silently
|
||||
drop the association.
|
||||
Written via snapshot() + save() rather than a queryset update(), which emits no post_save
|
||||
and so records nothing in the changelog. The Circuit is re-fetched so that sequential A/Z
|
||||
saves snapshot current state; concurrent writers under READ COMMITTED still cannot see
|
||||
each other's uncommitted writes.
|
||||
|
||||
The Circuit is re-fetched rather than reusing a cached `self.circuit` so that saving the A
|
||||
and Z terminations in sequence does not snapshot a Circuit loaded before the A pointer was
|
||||
written. That only holds within a single sequential flow: under READ COMMITTED, concurrent
|
||||
writers can each snapshot a Circuit which does not yet reflect the other's uncommitted
|
||||
write. The row itself is safe, as update_fields limits the write to the pointer fields
|
||||
this termination owns (plus last_updated, which is last-writer-wins).
|
||||
Returns the Circuit, or None if no such row exists.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
circuit = Circuit.objects.filter(pk=circuit_id).first()
|
||||
if circuit is None:
|
||||
return
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
# Skip fields which already hold the intended value, so that a redundant write neither
|
||||
# touches the row nor dispatches an event
|
||||
# Skip fields which already hold the intended value
|
||||
fields = {
|
||||
field_name: value
|
||||
for field_name, value in fields.items()
|
||||
if getattr(circuit, f'{field_name}_id') != value
|
||||
}
|
||||
if not fields:
|
||||
return
|
||||
return circuit
|
||||
|
||||
circuit.snapshot()
|
||||
for field_name, value in fields.items():
|
||||
setattr(circuit, f'{field_name}_id', value)
|
||||
circuit.save(update_fields=[*fields, 'last_updated'])
|
||||
|
||||
return circuit
|
||||
|
||||
def cache_related_objects(self):
|
||||
self._provider_network = self._region = self._site_group = self._site = self._location = None
|
||||
if self.termination_type:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
|
|||
import uuid
|
||||
from unittest.mock import patch
|
||||
|
||||
from django.contrib.contenttypes.models import ContentType
|
||||
from django.core.exceptions import NON_FIELD_ERRORS, ValidationError
|
||||
|
|
@ -280,9 +281,8 @@ class CircuitTerminationDenormalizationTriggerTestCase(TestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
class CircuitTerminationChangeLoggingTestCase(TestCase):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
The Circuit.termination_a/termination_z pointers are maintained by CircuitTermination.save().
|
||||
They were previously written with a queryset update(), which emits no post_save and therefore
|
||||
no ObjectChange, so consumers which replay the changelog never saw the association. (#23134)
|
||||
Circuit.termination_a/termination_z are maintained by CircuitTermination.save(). Writing them
|
||||
with a queryset update() emitted no post_save, and so no ObjectChange. (#23134)
|
||||
"""
|
||||
@classmethod
|
||||
def setUpTestData(cls):
|
||||
|
|
@ -327,8 +327,7 @@ class CircuitTerminationChangeLoggingTestCase(TestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
@tag('regression') # Ref: #23134
|
||||
def test_second_termination_snapshots_current_state(self):
|
||||
# The A pointer is already committed when the Z termination is created; its prechange
|
||||
# snapshot must reflect that rather than a Circuit cached before the A write.
|
||||
# The A pointer is already committed when the Z termination is created
|
||||
termination_a = self._tracked(lambda: CircuitTermination.objects.create(
|
||||
circuit=self.circuits[0], term_side='A', termination=self.sites[0],
|
||||
))
|
||||
|
|
@ -358,13 +357,13 @@ class CircuitTerminationChangeLoggingTestCase(TestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
self._tracked(_move)
|
||||
|
||||
# The old circuit's pointer is cleared...
|
||||
# The old circuit's pointer is cleared
|
||||
old_changes = self._circuit_changes(self.circuits[0])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(old_changes.count(), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(old_changes[0].prechange_data['termination_a'], termination.pk)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(old_changes[0].postchange_data['termination_a'])
|
||||
|
||||
# ...and the new circuit's pointer is set.
|
||||
# The new circuit's pointer is set
|
||||
new_changes = self._circuit_changes(self.circuits[1])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(new_changes.count(), 1)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(new_changes[0].prechange_data['termination_a'])
|
||||
|
|
@ -383,8 +382,7 @@ class CircuitTerminationChangeLoggingTestCase(TestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
self._tracked(_flip)
|
||||
|
||||
# Both pointers move within one circuit, so the clear and the set are coalesced into one
|
||||
# write rather than passing through a state with neither side set.
|
||||
# Both pointers move within one circuit, so the clear and the set are coalesced
|
||||
changes = self._circuit_changes(self.circuits[0])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(changes.count(), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(changes[0].prechange_data['termination_a'], termination.pk)
|
||||
|
|
@ -394,8 +392,8 @@ class CircuitTerminationChangeLoggingTestCase(TestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
@tag('regression') # Ref: #23134
|
||||
def test_redundant_pointer_write_is_skipped(self):
|
||||
# bulk_create() bypasses save(), so the circuit's pointer is never written. Moving the
|
||||
# termination afterwards reaches the clear path with the pointer already null.
|
||||
# bulk_create() bypasses save(), leaving the pointer unwritten; moving the termination
|
||||
# afterwards reaches the clear path with it already null
|
||||
CircuitTermination.objects.bulk_create([
|
||||
CircuitTermination(circuit=self.circuits[0], term_side='A', termination=self.sites[0]),
|
||||
])
|
||||
|
|
@ -409,13 +407,13 @@ class CircuitTerminationChangeLoggingTestCase(TestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
self._tracked(_move)
|
||||
|
||||
# The old circuit's pointer was already null, so it is not written to at all...
|
||||
# The old circuit's pointer was already null, so it is not written to
|
||||
self.assertFalse(self._circuit_changes(self.circuits[0]).exists())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
Circuit.objects.get(pk=self.circuits[0].pk).last_updated, old_circuit_last_updated
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# ...while the new circuit's pointer is set as usual.
|
||||
# The new circuit's pointer is set as usual
|
||||
new_changes = self._circuit_changes(self.circuits[1])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(new_changes.count(), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(new_changes[0].postchange_data['termination_a'], termination.pk)
|
||||
|
|
@ -433,8 +431,7 @@ class CircuitTerminationChangeLoggingTestCase(TestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
@tag('regression') # Ref: #23134
|
||||
def test_circuit_change_via_update_fields_records_circuit_update(self):
|
||||
# save(update_fields=...) takes its own branch when deciding whether the circuit or
|
||||
# term_side is being persisted; the pointer writes must be recorded there too.
|
||||
# save(update_fields=...) takes its own branch when deciding what is being persisted
|
||||
termination = self._tracked(lambda: CircuitTermination.objects.create(
|
||||
circuit=self.circuits[0], term_side='A', termination=self.sites[0],
|
||||
))
|
||||
|
|
@ -454,20 +451,45 @@ class CircuitTerminationChangeLoggingTestCase(TestCase):
|
|||
self.assertEqual(new_changes.count(), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(new_changes[0].postchange_data['termination_a'], termination.pk)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_deletion_clears_pointer_without_recording_a_change(self):
|
||||
# Deleting a termination clears the pointer via on_delete=SET_NULL, which emits no
|
||||
# post_save and so is not change-logged. handle_deleted_object() does not cover it
|
||||
# either: termination_a/termination_z declare related_name='+', so they are hidden
|
||||
# relations and absent from CircuitTermination._meta.related_objects. The changelog is
|
||||
# therefore still asymmetric here; documented rather than fixed, as replaying the
|
||||
# termination's DELETE re-applies SET_NULL on the target side.
|
||||
def test_deletion_clears_pointer(self):
|
||||
# on_delete=SET_NULL clears the pointer without a post_save, and related_name='+' keeps
|
||||
# these relations out of _meta.related_objects, so handle_deleted_object() misses them
|
||||
# too. Only the resulting database state is asserted.
|
||||
termination = self._tracked(lambda: CircuitTermination.objects.create(
|
||||
circuit=self.circuits[0], term_side='A', termination=self.sites[0],
|
||||
))
|
||||
ObjectChange.objects.all().delete()
|
||||
|
||||
self._tracked(termination.delete)
|
||||
|
||||
self.circuits[0].refresh_from_db()
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(self.circuits[0].termination_a_id)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(self._circuit_changes(self.circuits[0]).exists())
|
||||
|
||||
@tag('regression') # Ref: #23134
|
||||
def test_failed_pointer_write_leaves_the_change_pending(self):
|
||||
# The cached originals must not advance until the pointer writes have succeeded
|
||||
termination = self._tracked(lambda: CircuitTermination.objects.create(
|
||||
circuit=self.circuits[0], term_side='A', termination=self.sites[0],
|
||||
))
|
||||
|
||||
def _move():
|
||||
termination.circuit = self.circuits[1]
|
||||
termination.save()
|
||||
|
||||
with patch.object(
|
||||
CircuitTermination, '_set_circuit_terminations', side_effect=OSError('boom')
|
||||
):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(OSError):
|
||||
self._tracked(_move)
|
||||
|
||||
# The termination row was rolled back along with the pointer writes
|
||||
termination.refresh_from_db()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(termination.circuit, self.circuits[0])
|
||||
|
||||
# A retry still sees the move as pending, so both pointers end up correct
|
||||
termination.circuit = self.circuits[1]
|
||||
self._tracked(termination.save)
|
||||
|
||||
self.circuits[0].refresh_from_db()
|
||||
self.circuits[1].refresh_from_db()
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(self.circuits[0].termination_a_id)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.circuits[1].termination_a_id, termination.pk)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue