fix(server): bound accepted-interaction continuation recovery (#9656)

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Heartbeat recovery keeps assigned issues moving when a run or
continuation path disappears
> - Accepted issue-thread interactions can create a continuation wake
after an agent previously parked for review
> - The recovery sweep could requeue that accepted-interaction wake
while the queued-run gate cancelled it using the older pre-acceptance
park summary
> - That cancellation path had no bound, so recovery could repeat the
same wake and cancellation indefinitely
> - This pull request makes accepted-interaction evidence supersede the
older park and caps repeated recovery cancellations at three attempts
> - The benefit is that accepted work resumes normally, while genuine
repeated failures become a visible dependency wait or escalation instead
of a cancel loop

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #9331

The accepted-interaction continuation recovery added by #9331 can
encounter a stale continuation summary written before approval. The
sweep requeues a continuation carrying the accepted interaction
timestamp, but queued-run invalidation cancels it because the older
summary says to wait for review. Recovery then sees the accepted
interaction without a successful run and requeues again. This PR
prevents that stale-summary cancellation and adds a bounded fallback if
three equivalent cancellations have already occurred.

## What Changed

- Let queued continuation wakes with a parseable `interactionResolvedAt`
bypass a pre-acceptance waiting-for-review park summary.
- Count consecutive unsuccessful continuation runs for the same issue
and agent since interaction acceptance; after three review-park
cancellations, convert a real dependency wait or use the existing
visible escalation path.
- Add focused regression coverage for the park bypass, unchanged
non-interaction park behavior, below-cap requeue, cap escalation, and
successful-run skip.
- Document the accepted-interaction precedence and bounded requeue
contract in execution semantics §9.2.

## Verification

- `pnpm vitest run
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts -t "accepted
interaction continuation recovery|accepted interaction recovery after
its continuation succeeds|requeues accepted interaction continuations
stranded"`
- `pnpm vitest run
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-stale-queue-invalidation.test.ts -t
"pre-acceptance review park|continuation summary parks executor work"`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`

## Risks

- Low risk: the park bypass only applies when the queued context
contains a parseable interaction resolution timestamp.
- The retry bound is scoped to unsuccessful `issue_continuation_needed`
runs for the same company, issue, agent, error code, and post-acceptance
time window.
- No schema, migration, API, or UI changes.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-5.5`, high-reasoning coding mode
with repository tool use and command execution; context-window size was
not exposed by the runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
Dotta 2026-07-16 02:34:20 -05:00 committed by GitHub
parent 3124dd0f1e
commit 4f9894df44
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
5 changed files with 295 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -516,6 +516,8 @@ Recovery rule for a parked-for-review continuation:
- if the issue has a real waiting target — open (non-terminal) sub-tasks or existing unresolved blockers — Paperclip converts the deliberate wait into a first-class dependency wait: it sets the issue `blocked` by those issues, keeps the original assignee, and posts a plain-language comment explaining that the task will resume automatically when its dependencies finish. The issue then self-resumes through the normal `issue_blockers_resolved` path; no recovery action or escalation owner is involved
- if the issue has no waiting target, the park is indistinguishable from a genuine strand and falls through to the standard §9.2 escalation, preserving stranded detection
An accepted interaction supersedes a continuation park recorded before that acceptance. A queued continuation carrying a parseable `interactionResolvedAt` must not be cancelled solely because an older continuation summary says to wait for review or approval. Interaction-continuation recovery is bounded: after three consecutive continuation wakes are cancelled without a run starting, recovery converts a real dependency wait when one exists or escalates the missing execution path visibly instead of requeueing forever.
This keeps the post-decomposition umbrella (§7) on a real waiting path instead of relying on `parentId` rollup, which §6 does not treat as a dependency.
### 9.3 Recovery model-profile lane

View File

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto";
import { spawn, type ChildProcess } from "node:child_process";
import { and, eq, or, inArray } from "drizzle-orm";
import { and, eq, or, inArray, sql } from "drizzle-orm";
import { afterAll, afterEach, beforeAll, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
import {
activityLog,
@ -4097,6 +4097,197 @@ describeEmbeddedPostgres("heartbeat orphaned process recovery", () => {
});
});
it("escalates accepted interaction continuation recovery after three review-park cancellations", async () => {
const companyId = randomUUID();
const agentId = randomUUID();
const issueId = randomUUID();
const interactionId = randomUUID();
const resolvedAt = new Date("2026-03-19T00:05:00.000Z");
const issuePrefix = `T${companyId.replace(/-/g, "").slice(0, 6).toUpperCase()}`;
await db.insert(companies).values({
id: companyId,
name: "Paperclip",
issuePrefix,
defaultResponsibleUserId: "responsible-user",
requireBoardApprovalForNewAgents: false,
});
await db.insert(agents).values({
id: agentId,
companyId,
name: "CodexCoder",
role: "engineer",
status: "idle",
adapterType: "codex_local",
adapterConfig: {},
runtimeConfig: { heartbeat: { wakeOnDemand: true, maxConcurrentRuns: 1 } },
permissions: {},
});
await db.insert(issues).values({
id: issueId,
companyId,
title: "Accepted plan cancellation loop",
status: "in_review",
priority: "medium",
assigneeAgentId: agentId,
responsibleUserId: "responsible-user",
issueNumber: 1,
identifier: `${issuePrefix}-1`,
});
await db.insert(issueThreadInteractions).values({
id: interactionId,
companyId,
issueId,
kind: "request_confirmation",
status: "accepted",
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee_on_accept",
createdByAgentId: agentId,
resolvedByUserId: "responsible-user",
resolvedAt,
updatedAt: resolvedAt,
payload: { version: 1, prompt: "Approve the plan?" },
result: { outcome: "accepted" },
});
for (let attempt = 1; attempt <= 3; attempt += 1) {
const finishedAt = new Date(resolvedAt.getTime() + attempt * 60_000);
await db.insert(heartbeatRuns).values({
id: randomUUID(),
companyId,
agentId,
invocationSource: "automation",
triggerDetail: "system",
status: "cancelled",
errorCode: "issue_continuation_waiting_on_review",
error: "Continuation summary still says to wait for review",
contextSnapshot: {
issueId,
taskId: issueId,
wakeReason: "issue_continuation_needed",
retryReason: "issue_continuation_needed",
mutation: "interaction",
interactionId,
interactionResolvedAt: resolvedAt.toISOString(),
},
createdAt: finishedAt,
startedAt: finishedAt,
finishedAt,
updatedAt: finishedAt,
});
}
const heartbeat = heartbeatService(db);
const result = await heartbeat.reconcileStrandedAssignedIssues();
expect(result.continuationRequeued).toBe(0);
expect(result.waitingOnReviewResolved).toBe(0);
expect(result.escalated).toBe(1);
expect(result.issueIds).toContain(issueId);
const [issue, continuationRuns, comments] = await Promise.all([
db.select().from(issues).where(eq(issues.id, issueId)).then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null),
db
.select({ id: heartbeatRuns.id })
.from(heartbeatRuns)
.where(and(
eq(heartbeatRuns.companyId, companyId),
eq(heartbeatRuns.agentId, agentId),
sql`${heartbeatRuns.contextSnapshot} ->> 'issueId' = ${issueId}`,
sql`${heartbeatRuns.contextSnapshot} ->> 'retryReason' = 'issue_continuation_needed'`,
)),
db.select({ body: issueComments.body }).from(issueComments).where(eq(issueComments.issueId, issueId)),
]);
expect(issue?.status).toBe("blocked");
expect(continuationRuns).toHaveLength(3);
expect(comments.some((comment) => comment.body.includes(interactionId))).toBe(true);
});
it("skips accepted interaction recovery after its continuation succeeds", async () => {
const companyId = randomUUID();
const agentId = randomUUID();
const issueId = randomUUID();
const interactionId = randomUUID();
const resolvedAt = new Date("2026-03-19T00:05:00.000Z");
const succeededAt = new Date("2026-03-19T00:06:00.000Z");
const issuePrefix = `T${companyId.replace(/-/g, "").slice(0, 6).toUpperCase()}`;
await db.insert(companies).values({
id: companyId,
name: "Paperclip",
issuePrefix,
defaultResponsibleUserId: "responsible-user",
requireBoardApprovalForNewAgents: false,
});
await db.insert(agents).values({
id: agentId,
companyId,
name: "CodexCoder",
role: "engineer",
status: "idle",
adapterType: "codex_local",
adapterConfig: {},
runtimeConfig: { heartbeat: { wakeOnDemand: true, maxConcurrentRuns: 1 } },
permissions: {},
});
await db.insert(issues).values({
id: issueId,
companyId,
title: "Accepted plan already resumed",
status: "in_review",
priority: "medium",
assigneeAgentId: agentId,
responsibleUserId: "responsible-user",
issueNumber: 1,
identifier: `${issuePrefix}-1`,
});
await db.insert(issueThreadInteractions).values({
id: interactionId,
companyId,
issueId,
kind: "request_confirmation",
status: "accepted",
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee_on_accept",
createdByAgentId: agentId,
resolvedByUserId: "responsible-user",
resolvedAt,
updatedAt: resolvedAt,
payload: { version: 1, prompt: "Approve the plan?" },
result: { outcome: "accepted" },
});
await db.insert(heartbeatRuns).values({
id: randomUUID(),
companyId,
agentId,
invocationSource: "automation",
triggerDetail: "system",
status: "succeeded",
contextSnapshot: {
issueId,
taskId: issueId,
wakeReason: "issue_continuation_needed",
retryReason: "issue_continuation_needed",
mutation: "interaction",
interactionId,
interactionResolvedAt: resolvedAt.toISOString(),
},
createdAt: succeededAt,
startedAt: succeededAt,
finishedAt: succeededAt,
updatedAt: succeededAt,
});
const heartbeat = heartbeatService(db);
const result = await heartbeat.reconcileStrandedAssignedIssues();
expect(result.continuationRequeued).toBe(0);
expect(result.escalated).toBe(0);
expect(result.skipped).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1);
const runs = await db
.select({ id: heartbeatRuns.id })
.from(heartbeatRuns)
.where(eq(heartbeatRuns.agentId, agentId));
expect(runs).toHaveLength(1);
});
it("requeues accepted interaction continuations even when a later successful run is unrelated", async () => {
const companyId = randomUUID();
const agentId = randomUUID();

View File

@ -1543,4 +1543,63 @@ describeEmbeddedPostgres("heartbeat stale queued-run invalidation", () => {
expect(wakeup?.error).toContain("continuation summary says the executor should wait");
expect(countExecuteCallsForRun(runId)).toBe(0);
});
it("runs accepted-interaction continuation recovery despite a pre-acceptance review park", async () => {
const { companyId, agentId } = await seedCompanyAndAgent();
const issueId = randomUUID();
await db.insert(issues).values({
id: issueId,
companyId,
title: "Approved implementation resumes",
status: "in_progress",
priority: "medium",
assigneeAgentId: agentId,
});
await seedContinuationSummary({
companyId,
issueId,
agentId,
body: [
"# Continuation Summary",
"",
"## Next Action",
"",
"- Wait for reviewer feedback or approval before continuing executor work.",
].join("\n"),
});
const { runId } = await seedQueuedRun({
companyId,
agentId,
issueId,
wakeReason: "issue_continuation_needed",
invocationSource: "automation",
contextExtras: {
retryReason: "issue_continuation_needed",
mutation: "interaction",
interactionId: randomUUID(),
interactionResolvedAt: "2026-03-19T00:05:00.000Z",
},
});
await heartbeat.resumeQueuedRuns();
await waitForCondition(async () => {
const run = await db
.select({ status: heartbeatRuns.status })
.from(heartbeatRuns)
.where(eq(heartbeatRuns.id, runId))
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
return run?.status === "succeeded";
});
const run = await db
.select({ status: heartbeatRuns.status, errorCode: heartbeatRuns.errorCode })
.from(heartbeatRuns)
.where(eq(heartbeatRuns.id, runId))
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
expect(run?.status).toBe("succeeded");
expect(run?.errorCode).toBeNull();
expect(countExecuteCallsForRun(runId)).toBe(1);
});
});

View File

@ -10505,10 +10505,13 @@ export function heartbeatService(db: Db, options: HeartbeatServiceOptions = {})
const resumeIntent = context.resumeIntent === true || context.followUpRequested === true;
const wakeReason = readNonEmptyString(context.wakeReason);
const retryReason = readNonEmptyString(context.retryReason) ?? run.scheduledRetryReason ?? null;
const interactionResolvedAt = readNonEmptyString(context.interactionResolvedAt);
const hasResolvedInteractionEvidence = interactionResolvedAt !== null && !Number.isNaN(Date.parse(interactionResolvedAt));
if (
issue.status === "in_progress" &&
!wakeCommentId &&
!hasResolvedInteractionEvidence &&
(wakeReason === "issue_continuation_needed" || retryReason === "issue_continuation_needed")
) {
const queuedWake = parseObject(context.paperclipWake);

View File

@ -289,6 +289,7 @@ const NON_RETRYABLE_CONTINUATION_ERROR_CODES = new Set<string>([
// issue has a real waiting target we convert it into a normal dependency wait rather
// than escalating it as stranded.
const CONTINUATION_WAITING_ON_REVIEW_ERROR_CODE = "issue_continuation_waiting_on_review";
const INTERACTION_CONTINUATION_REQUEUE_MAX_ATTEMPTS = 3;
const CONTINUATION_RECOVERY_TRANSIENT_MAX_ATTEMPTS = 3;
const CONTINUATION_RECOVERY_DEFAULT_MAX_ATTEMPTS = 1;
@ -635,7 +636,9 @@ export function recoveryService(db: Db, deps: { enqueueWakeup: RecoveryWakeup })
async function summarizeRecentContinuationRetries(
companyId: string,
issueId: string,
agentId: string,
errorCodeToMatch: string | null,
since: Date | null = null,
) {
const rows = await db
.select({
@ -649,7 +652,9 @@ export function recoveryService(db: Db, deps: { enqueueWakeup: RecoveryWakeup })
.where(
and(
eq(heartbeatRuns.companyId, companyId),
eq(heartbeatRuns.agentId, agentId),
sql`${heartbeatRuns.contextSnapshot} ->> 'issueId' = ${issueId}`,
...(since ? [or(gte(heartbeatRuns.createdAt, since), gte(heartbeatRuns.finishedAt, since))] : []),
),
)
.orderBy(desc(heartbeatRuns.createdAt), desc(heartbeatRuns.id))
@ -3336,6 +3341,39 @@ export function recoveryService(db: Db, deps: { enqueueWakeup: RecoveryWakeup })
agentId,
acceptedInteractionResolvedAt,
);
const { consecutive } = await summarizeRecentContinuationRetries(
issue.companyId,
issue.id,
agentId,
CONTINUATION_WAITING_ON_REVIEW_ERROR_CODE,
acceptedInteractionResolvedAt,
);
if (consecutive >= INTERACTION_CONTINUATION_REQUEUE_MAX_ATTEMPTS && latestPostResolutionRun) {
const resolved = await resolveContinuationWaitingOnReview(issue);
if (resolved) {
result.waitingOnReviewResolved += 1;
result.issueIds.push(issue.id);
continue;
}
const updated = await escalateStrandedAssignedIssue({
issue,
previousStatus: issue.status as StrandedPreviousStatus,
latestRun: latestPostResolutionRun,
comment:
`Paperclip stopped requeueing accepted interaction \`${acceptedContinuationInteraction.id}\` after ` +
`${consecutive} consecutive continuation wakes were cancelled while waiting on review. ` +
"Moving the issue to `blocked` so the missing execution path is visible for intervention.",
});
if (updated) {
result.escalated += 1;
result.issueIds.push(issue.id);
} else {
result.skipped += 1;
}
continue;
}
const queued = await enqueueStrandedIssueRecovery({
issueId: issue.id,
agentId,
@ -3656,6 +3694,7 @@ export function recoveryService(db: Db, deps: { enqueueWakeup: RecoveryWakeup })
const { consecutive, latestFinishedAt } = await summarizeRecentContinuationRetries(
issue.companyId,
issue.id,
agentId,
classification.errorCode,
);
if (consecutive >= classification.maxAttempts) {