## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Issue interactions give agents and people a structured decision
record.
> - Resolver routes used different authorization rules.
> - Some routes blocked valid agents, including task watchdogs with
normal issue access.
> - The API did not show who could resolve a pending interaction.
> - This pull request gives every interaction kind one resolver policy
evaluator.
> - The benefit is a clear decision path with consistent governance and
company isolation.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Fixes: #8087
Refs: #7403
Related PR: #11082 proposes board-only confirmation rules. This change
keeps human-only review as an explicit policy.
**What happened?**
Agents could create issue interactions. Some resolver routes still
required board access.
This left valid agent confirmations pending. Task watchdogs could see
the same problem without board identity.
**Expected behavior**
Every interaction kind must use one resolver policy contract.
The contract must support `anyone`, `not_creator`, and `human_only`. It
must also apply all normal governance controls.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Create a `request_confirmation` interaction as an agent.
2. Resolve it with another authorized agent.
3. Observe the board-only denial.
**Paperclip version or commit**
The problem exists on `master` before this change.
**Deployment mode**
Local development with `pnpm dev`.
## What Changed
- Add canonical policies for `anyone`, `not_creator`, and `human_only`.
- Use one server evaluator for every interaction kind.
- Apply named addressees, company limits, review rules, and task
watchdog scope.
- Charge cross-issue resolutions to the existing per-run action limit.
- Return the effective resolver audience in attention and interaction
data.
- Show the audience, governance choices, and denial reasons in the board
UI.
- Add telemetry, API documents, product documents, and regression
fixtures.
- Add migration provenance for safe legacy behavior.
- Make migration `0218` safe for complete replays and partial prior
runs.
## Product Rules
- An interaction records a response. It does not grant authority for the
next action.
- `anyone` lets any authorized issue participant respond.
- `not_creator` requires a responder other than the interaction creator.
- `human_only` requires an authorized person.
- A named addressee, company policy, or governed action can narrow the
audience.
- These controls cannot widen the audience.
- A task watchdog uses the same rules as an ordinary agent.
- A task watchdog does not receive board authority.
- An agent resolution on another issue uses the shared cross-issue
action limit.
- Legacy pending interactions keep their earlier restrictions.
- The UI shows the effective audience and a permanent denial reason.
## Verification
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db check:migrations`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck`
- `pnpm exec vitest run
packages/db/src/issue-thread-interaction-resolver-policy-migration.test.ts`
- The focused PostgreSQL test applies migration `0218` twice.
- The test also completes a partial prior run and preserves existing
provenance.
- The latest GitHub head has 29 successful checks.
- The opt-in Storybook visual check skipped as expected.
- Greptile reports 5/5 with no open comments.
## Risks
- New interaction writes use `anyone` by default.
- Callers must select `not_creator` or `human_only` when they need
stricter review.
- Legacy pending interactions keep the old creator and human
restrictions.
- Migration `0218` fills only missing provenance fields during recovery.
- Cross-issue resolutions can reach the existing action limit.
- The shared evaluator affects every interaction kind.
- Route, service, database, shared contract, and UI tests cover these
rules.
> This work matches the Agent Reviews and Approvals direction in
`ROADMAP.md`. It does not duplicate a planned item.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex, GPT-5. The runtime does not expose the exact deployment ID
or context window.
The agent used reasoning, repository tools, shell commands, and test
execution.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either linked public issues or described the issue with the
required labels
- [x] I have not referenced internal Paperclip issues or links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
ticket id
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation
- [x] I have considered and documented the risks
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open comments
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
<!-- Write all pull request text in Simplified Technical English
(ASD-STE100): short sentences, one instruction per sentence, simple
approved vocabulary, and the active voice. -->
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip helps operators supervise agent work through tasks and
task threads.
> - The redesigned task thread shows the current work and its state.
> - A blocked task did not show the dependency that prevented progress.
> - Operators had to leave the thread to find the direct and final
blockers.
> - This pull request adds compact blocker links at the top and bottom
of the task thread.
> - The benefit is that operators can identify and open the relevant
tasks without adding a large notice to the thread.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What existing behavior does this improve?**
The redesigned task thread did not show which task directly blocked the
current task or which task ultimately blocked its dependency chain.
**Subsystem affected**
`server/`, `packages/shared/`, and `ui/` task-blocker presentation.
**Current behavior**
A blocked task can open in the redesigned thread without a visible
dependency link at the top or bottom of the conversation.
**Proposed behavior**
Show one compact amber row for the direct blocker. Show a second row for
the selected final blocker when one exists. Render the rows at both ends
of the thread.
**Reason and benefit**
Operators can see the reason for the blocked state and open the relevant
task from the conversation. The compact rows preserve thread density.
**Breaking changes**
None. The new blocker-attention fields are optional. Existing clients
remain compatible.
## What Changed
- Added a compact task-chat component for direct and selected final
blocker links.
- Added the blocker rows to the top and bottom of populated and empty
task threads.
- Added link-ready blocker-attention details so an intermediate selected
task stays on its correct direct chain.
- Included blocker-link changes in the thread content key so pinned
threads follow a newly added bottom row.
- Added component, scrolling, server contract, and Storybook coverage
for the new states.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/TaskChatThread.test.tsx
server/src/__tests__/issue-blocker-attention.test.ts` (38 tests passed)
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`
- `pnpm check:token-gates`
## Risks
- Low risk. The rows only render while the task status is `blocked` and
an unresolved blocker is available.
- Long titles are truncated to keep each blocker on one line. The full
task label remains available in the link title.
- Older server payloads keep the original leaf-selection behavior
because the new sampled details are optional.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex with GPT-5. The run used tool-enabled reasoning and code
execution. The context-window size was not exposed to the run.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The adapter runtime starts, turns, settles, and composes ACPX runs
> - Recent lifecycle corrections changed several order and cleanup rules
> - Those rules need regression coverage before the planned engine
refactor
> - This pull request adds characterization suites for the corrected
behavior
> - The benefit is a clear test baseline for the next refactor
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What existing behavior does this improve?**
The ACPX adapter runtime and server heartbeat lifecycle need stable
regression coverage for their current corrected behavior.
**Subsystem affected**
Cross-cutting (multiple of the above): `packages/adapter-utils` and
`server` test suites.
**Current behavior**
The runtime has corrected rules for startup, turns, settlement, composed
results, and heartbeat terminalization. The repository lacks a single
characterization baseline for these rules.
**Proposed behavior**
Keep the current lifecycle rules pinned by five test suites. Let the
later engine refactor change behavior only when it updates these tests
with a clear reason.
**Reason and benefit**
The suites expose order, cleanup, transport, timeout, retry, result, and
lease-release changes during the refactor. They also record one known
latent defect as current behavior.
**Breaking changes**
None. This pull request adds tests only.
## What Changed
- Add startup characterization coverage for commands, launch values,
session fingerprints, sync order, bridge overlap, and cleanup paths.
- Add turn characterization coverage for inputs, events, transports,
timeout and cancel behavior, retry rules, errors, and usage.
- Add settlement characterization coverage for teardown, adapter
sync-back, workspace restore order, native sync, and error policy.
- Add composed-run characterization coverage for result forms,
finalization sets, and host-lane warm save and warm hit behavior.
- Add server coverage that checks run terminalization before environment
lease release.
## Verification
- Run `npx vitest run
packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/startup-characterization.test.ts
packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/turn-characterization.test.ts
packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/settlement-characterization.test.ts
packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/composed-run-characterization.test.ts
packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/execute.test.ts`.
- Run `npx vitest run
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-run-terminalize-before-release.test.ts`.
- The adapter-utils run passes 178 tests, and the server run passes 4
tests.
- Check `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck`.
- Check `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`.
## Risks
Low risk. The change adds test files and does not change production
code. One known cold ensure-session cleanup defect remains pinned as
current behavior.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, with tool use and code execution.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Agent adapters run ACP sessions and manage runtime, workspace, and
lease resources.
> - Several failure paths left runtime bridges, staged workspaces, or
environment leases active after an error.
> - These leaks reduce run reliability and can leave later runs without
clean resources.
> - This pull request closes the failure paths, applies one teardown
policy, and adds regression tests.
> - The benefit is consistent failure settlement and safer reuse of
agent workspaces and leases.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
ACP runs could leave runtime bridges, staged workspaces, or environment
leases active after failures. Claude and Gemini ACP runs did not restore
the sandbox workspace on teardown. Lease release stopped when one lease
returned an error.
**Expected behavior**
Each ACP failure must return an error result and settle its resources.
Teardown must run each step, release leases independently, and restore
the host workspace when the sandbox ends. Pending cleanup leases must
receive bounded retry attempts.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Run an ACP session that fails after runtime creation or during turn
preparation.
2. Run an ACP session that fails during a warm hit or staged runtime
handoff.
3. Run lease cleanup with more than one lease when the first release
returns an error.
4. Inspect the result phase, teardown calls, workspace state, and lease
metadata.
5. Run the regression suites listed in the Verification section.
## What Changed
- Settle every ACP failure after runtime creation with an error result
and one sandbox.startup span closure.
- Close the ACP runtime and remove warm entries after every pre-turn
failure.
- Run all teardown steps, record teardown errors, release staging leases
in finally, and prevent duplicate teardown.
- Dispose staged runtimes after seam failures and remove borrowed staged
entries with identity guards.
- Add fail-open workspace sync-back teardown for Claude and Gemini ACP
adapters.
- Isolate lease release errors and add bounded retry sweeps for stranded
pending_cleanup leases.
- Atomically claim pending_cleanup retries and clamp attempt readers to
keep the five-attempt bound.
- Default absent provider reusableLeases values to false and align the
fake provider with its runtime declaration.
- Add regression tests for engine, adapter, server, and shared
environment behavior.
## Verification
- [x] `npx vitest run
packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/execute.test.ts` — 124 tests
passed.
- [x] `npx vitest run
packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/acp.test.ts
packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/acp.test.ts
packages/adapters/gemini-local/src/server/acp.test.ts` — 61 tests
passed.
- [x] `npx vitest run server/src/__tests__/environment-runtime.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-pending-cleanup-sweep.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/reusable-leases-default.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/environment-routes.test.ts
packages/shared/src/environment-support.test.ts` — passed.
- [x] All listed suites ran from the repository root.
- [x] GitHub CI completed successfully for
`cfc349c9f232711433897915112a1c52c0e462ca`.
- [x] Greptile completed with a 5/5 confidence score and no blocking
finding.
## Risks
The engine changes affect failure settlement and teardown order across
ACP runs. The server changes add retry state to existing lease metadata
without a schema migration. The adapter changes restore workspaces after
sandbox execution. Regression tests cover the changed paths. GitHub CI
and Greptile passed for the current head.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. This change fixes runtime
reliability and does not duplicate a roadmap feature.
## Model Used
OpenAI GPT-5 Codex. The model used tool-based repository inspection,
GitHub operations, and code review support. The runtime does not expose
a context-window value.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (for example, `docs/...` or
`fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or
instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Sandbox provider plugins run agent work in remote execution
environments
> - The Daytona sandbox liveness read can stay pending when the
connection stops responding
> - A pending read blocks the plugin until a broad host-to-worker limit
expires
> - This pull request adds bounded deadlines to Daytona liveness calls
and clears stale handles
> - The benefit is a fast and clear error when a Daytona connection
stops responding
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #11341
**What happened?**
The Daytona sandbox liveness read had no per-call timeout. A silent
connection failure left the read pending until the broad host-to-worker
RPC limit expired.
**Expected behavior**
The plugin should stop a liveness call within a defined limit and report
a clear timeout error.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Create a Daytona sandbox handle.
2. Make the cached handle freshness read never resolve.
3. Run the next sandbox operation.
4. Observe that the operation waits for the outer RPC limit without a
liveness timeout.
**Paperclip version or commit**
`master` before this change.
**Deployment mode**
Any deployment mode that uses the Daytona sandbox provider.
## What Changed
- Add `withLivenessTimeout` with timer cleanup and
`SandboxLivenessTimeoutError`.
- Bound `refreshData` with configurable `livenessTimeoutMs`, which
defaults to 30000 milliseconds.
- Bound sandbox start and recovery calls with the SDK timeout plus a
5000 millisecond margin.
- Reject `livenessTimeoutMs` values above 86400000 milliseconds and
document the setting.
- Evict a cached handle after a failed freshness refresh so the next
operation fetches a new handle.
- Add a test for a never-resolving freshness refresh and the
cached-handle eviction.
## Verification
- Run the Daytona plugin test suite with its package Vitest
configuration.
- Confirm that 150 of 150 tests pass.
- Confirm that the new test reports a bounded timeout and a fresh handle
on the next operation.
- Confirm that GitHub Actions reports green status checks after the pull
request starts.
## Risks
This change adds an early timeout only to Daytona liveness calls. A
value of 0 or less disables the extra bound. The default leaves normal
SDK calls within their expected time limit. The main risk is a timeout
value that is too short for a slow but healthy connection.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex, GPT-5. The model used tool calls and code execution. The
model supplied the PR handoff and did not author the code in this pull
request.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Paperclip provides CLI commands and guidance for operators and
agents
> - The `pnpm paperclipai` script can pass argument values through a
shell
> - Shell re-parsing can execute command substitutions inside quoted
values
> - This pull request routes guidance through inert-argv `npx
paperclipai` commands and adds regression coverage
> - The benefit is safer operator guidance across documentation and
runtime hints
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
This pull request fixes a command-injection-class defect in Paperclip
CLI guidance.
**What happened?**
The `pnpm paperclipai <sub> --flag "$VALUE"` form can re-parse argument
values through a shell. A command substitution inside a quoted value can
execute on the host.
**Expected behavior**
Paperclip guidance must pass CLI values as inert argument values.
Host-derived values must not appear in copyable commands.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Run a Paperclip guidance command that uses the `pnpm paperclipai`
script.
2. Provide a quoted value that contains a command substitution.
3. Observe that the shell can evaluate the substitution before the CLI
starts.
4. Compare the result with the `npx paperclipai` form.
**Paperclip version or commit**
`5670984b75d109950c968542a0111ebb6967f4da`
**Deployment mode**
All deployment modes that show or use the affected CLI guidance.
**Installation method**
Built from source and installed CLI guidance.
**Agent adapter(s) involved**
Not adapter-specific (core bug).
**Database mode**
Not database-related.
**Access context**
Both.
**Additional context**
The earlier merged PR
[#11343](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/11343) used the
unsafe `pnpm exec paperclipai` form. This fresh PR replaces that
guidance with the safe `npx paperclipai` form.
## What Changed
- Standardize documentation and runtime hints on `npx paperclipai`.
- Remove the broken `pnpm exec paperclipai` guidance.
- Use a static `<host>` placeholder in private-hostname guidance.
- Add regression tests for unsafe forms, continued lines, static hosts,
and offline guidance.
## Verification
- `git diff --check
origin/master...origin/fix/paperclipai-cli-npx-safe-invocation` passes.
- The branch adds `server/src/__tests__/cli-invocation-safety.test.ts`
and updates private-hostname tests.
- CI must run the new tests, typecheck, lint, and build checks.
- Local Vitest execution was not available because this worktree has no
installed Vitest binary.
## Risks
- The change affects operator and agent documentation text.
- The runtime hints now show `<host>` instead of a request-derived host
value.
- No database schema or migration changes exist.
- CI will detect any missed unsafe invocation or type error.
## Model Used
OpenAI GPT-5, exact model ID `gpt-5`, with tool use and code-review
assistance. The model used repository inspection, Git operations, and PR
preparation.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] CI ran the test suites and they pass; local test execution was
unavailable in this worktree
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I addressed all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting
merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The recovery subsystem repairs issues stranded without a valid
disposition: `decideSuccessfulRunHandoff` queues one corrective wake per
successful-but-dispositionless run, and `source_scoped_recovery_action`
wakes a recovery owner for stranded issues
> - `decideSuccessfulRunHandoff` already refuses to treat corrective
handoff runs, issue-monitor runs, and comment-driven wakes as handoff
*sources* — but not runs woken by `source_scoped_recovery_action`
> - Because the handoff idempotency key includes `sourceRunId`, every
succeeding recovery run is a brand-new source: recovery run → handoff
wake → corrective run → new recovery action → recovery run → … with
`DEFAULT_MAX_SUCCESSFUL_RUN_HANDOFF_ATTEMPTS` never binding (it is
per-source-run) and the source-scoped recovery action created with
`maxAttempts: null`
> - The cycle is unbounded, each leg is a ~15s no-op "succeeded" run,
and the designed handoff-exhausted escalation (blocked + exhausted
notice) never engages
> - This PR adds recovery-action-driven runs to the existing skip list,
so recovery runs own their own follow-up path and the stranded-issue
escalation remains the exit when the disposition is still missing
> - The benefit is that missing-disposition recovery converges (one
handoff, then escalation) instead of ping-ponging wake volume
unboundedly
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #6523 — same wake-loop family (repeated
`source_scoped_recovery_action` wakes); this PR fixes the variant where
the loop partner is the successful-run handoff.
**Observed behavior:** in a 16-agent deployment, one agent produced 223
runs in 2 hours, every run `succeeded` with ~15s duration, with
`contextSnapshot.wakeReason` alternating exactly between
`source_scoped_recovery_action` (109) and
`finish_successful_run_handoff` (108). The source issue never reached
the exhausted escalation.
## What Changed
- `server/src/services/recovery/successful-run-handoff.ts`: new
`isRecoveryActionDrivenRun` predicate (matches
`contextSnapshot.wakeReason === "source_scoped_recovery_action"` or a
present `contextSnapshot.recoveryActionId`), consulted in
`decideSuccessfulRunHandoff` alongside the existing corrective-handoff /
issue-monitor / comment-driven skip guards.
- `server/src/services/recovery/successful-run-handoff.test.ts`: cases
asserting recovery-driven runs are skipped via both markers.
## Verification
- `pnpm -F @paperclipai/server exec vitest run
src/services/recovery/successful-run-handoff.test.ts` → 17 passed (16
existing unchanged + 1 new).
- Production validation (same logic deployed as a dist patch on
2026.626.0): the alternating recovery/handoff wake pattern stopped after
restart; ordinary successful-run handoffs (first corrective wake per
genuine source run) continue to queue.
## Risks
Low-to-moderate, scoped to one decision function. The behavioral shift:
a recovery-action run that succeeds without fixing the disposition no
longer gets a corrective handoff wake — instead the stranded-issue
detector escalates (blocked + recovery owner + exhausted notice), which
per the existing `escalateStrandedAssignedIssue` code is the designed
terminal path. Runs not woken by a recovery action are unaffected
(covered by the existing 16 tests, all green).
## Model Used
Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`), extended thinking, agentic tool use
via Claude Code. Human-reviewed before submission.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Lock the issue before accepting or rejecting review confirmations, reauthorize against the current policy, and cover concurrent policy tightening.
Co-Authored-By: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Recheck terminal verdict and policy mutations under a row lock, and scope interaction verdict enforcement to the review confirmation itself.
Co-Authored-By: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Authorize verdicts and policy changes against the stored restrictive review policy, remove downgrade guidance, and cover both restrictive policies with route regressions.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Agents move their work into review, and a reviewer must then give a
verdict on it
> - By default anyone with write access can give that verdict, including
the agent that did the work
> - The server can constrain that default per issue with a
`reviewPolicy` column, but no screen showed the value
> - A reviewer could therefore press Approve on a review that the server
refuses, and get a 403
> - This pull request shows the policy as a badge on the two surfaces
where a person gives a verdict
> - It also makes an agent verdict read as a verdict in the activity
timeline
> - The benefit is that a reviewer sees who can approve before they try
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public GitHub issue exists for this change. The description below
follows
`.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/enhancement.yml`.
**What existing behavior does this improve?**
The issue review flow. A reviewer cannot see the approval constraint on
an issue
before they give a verdict.
**Subsystem affected**
Web UI (`ui/`), with one supporting change in the server attention
service.
**Current behavior**
The server stores an optional approval constraint for each issue in a
`reviewPolicy` column. The column has three meaningful states: the
default
(`NULL` or `anyone`), `not_creator`, and `human_only`. The server
enforces the
constraint when it receives a verdict.
No screen shows the value. Two problems follow:
1. A reviewer presses Approve on a review that the server refuses. The
server
answers 403, and the reason is not visible on the card.
2. An agent that accepts or rejects a review renders in the activity
timeline as
the raw action id, for example "issue thread interaction accepted". A
person
who reads the timeline cannot tell that a verdict was given.
**Proposed behavior**
Show the constraint as a read-only badge on the two surfaces where a
person
gives a verdict. Show no pixels for the default state, because the
default is
what every issue already does. Make an agent verdict read as a verdict
in the
timeline.
Only agents set the column today, so this change adds no control to set
it.
**Reason and benefit**
A reviewer sees the constraint before they act. This prevents the 403,
and it
removes the need to explain the 403 afterwards. The timeline also
becomes
complete, because it now shows agent verdicts and human verdicts in the
same way.
**Breaking changes**
None. The change adds a badge and changes copy. It adds no column, no
endpoint,
and no request.
**Additional context**
The server-side column and the verdict enforcement landed earlier in
#10931.
This pull request is the user interface for that column. The default
state stays
unchanged on screen, so the badge appears on a small number of issues.
## What Changed
- **A read-only "Approvals" row** in the issue Execution properties. The
row
renders *only* for a constrained policy: "Anyone else" (`not_creator`)
or
"Human only" (`human_only`). A `NULL` or `anyone` column adds no row, so
the
panel is untouched on the overwhelming majority of issues.
- **The same badge on the stalled-review card** in `/decisions`, above
the three
review verbs. A reviewer now sees the constraint before they press
Approve.
The condition is the same, so the default card is unchanged.
- **Agent verdicts read as verdicts in the activity timeline.** An agent
that
accepted or rejected a review request previously rendered the raw action
id
("issue thread interaction accepted"). It now reads "approved the
request". A
stalled-review decision names the verb that the actor chose.
- **A cleared policy reports as "anyone", not "none",** in the
field-change
receipt. The `reviewPolicy` column is nullable by default, so an absent
value
is a real setting rather than a missing one.
- **All copy comes from `ui/src/lib/review-policy.ts`.** Its badge
lookup returns
`null` for the default. This makes "no pixels for the default" one
enforced
decision instead of a condition repeated at each call site. It also
keeps the
badge, the activity line, and the receipt reading alike.
- **The server attention service carries the policy** on the review
attention
subject, so the stalled-review card can read it.
## Verification
Automated tests:
- `ui/src/lib/review-policy.test.ts` — the default returns no badge,
however the
column spells it (`null`, `undefined`, `"anyone"`). An unrecognised
policy from
the wire shows nothing rather than leaking an enum value.
- `ui/src/components/AttentionQueueRow.test.tsx` — no badge on the
default card,
and the verbs still render. Suppression of the badge must not suppress
the card.
- `ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx` — no Approvals row on the
default.
The constrained row contains no `button`, so nothing there can PATCH.
- `server/src/__tests__/attention-service.test.ts` — the review
attention subject
carries the policy, and subjects built from narrower selects do not
claim one.
Run them with:
```sh
pnpm vitest run ui/src/lib/review-policy.test.ts \
ui/src/components/AttentionQueueRow.test.tsx \
ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx \
server/src/__tests__/attention-service.test.ts
```
Manual steps:
1. Open an issue that has no `reviewPolicy`. Confirm that the Execution
properties panel shows no Approvals row.
2. Set the column to `not_creator`. Reload the issue. Confirm that the
Approvals
row reads "Anyone else", and that the row has no control.
3. Move that issue into review. Open `/decisions`. Confirm that the
stalled
review card shows the same badge above the review verbs.
4. Let an agent approve the review. Confirm that the activity timeline
reads
"approved the request" and not "issue thread interaction accepted".
Screenshots were captured at 1440x900 and 390x844, in light mode and
dark mode,
with the three policy states side by side. The leftmost column in each
capture is
the default. It carries no badge and no extra row.
## Risks
Low risk.
- The change is additive on screen. Every new surface is behind a
constrained
policy, so the default path renders exactly as before.
- The badge is read-only. It has no control and sends no request, and a
test
asserts that the row contains no `button`.
- An unknown policy value from the wire renders nothing. It does not
render the
raw enum.
- No migration, no schema change, and no endpoint change.
## Model Used
Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic), model id `claude-opus-5[1m]`, 1M context
window,
with extended thinking and tool use enabled. Used through Claude Code
for the
implementation, the tests, and this description.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Execution workspaces give agent tasks isolated Git worktrees
> - Archived isolated workspaces must reopen against a live project
checkout
> - A managed_checkout project has no project workspace directory in its
row
> - The reopen path used the removed archived worktree as the Git
working directory
> - This pull request resolves the live managed checkout and reports a
clear error when it is unavailable
> - The benefit is reliable workspace reopen behavior after archive
cleanup
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Related public pull request:
[#6164](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/6164) clears
archive state during un-archive. This pull request fixes the separate
reopen failure that occurs after archive cleanup.
**What happened?**
An archived isolated `git_worktree` workspace under a `managed_checkout`
project failed to reopen after cleanup. The route attempted to run Git
in the removed archived worktree and returned a generic service error.
**Expected behavior**
The reopen path should use the live managed checkout as the Git base
directory and should return a clear error when that directory is
unavailable.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Create a project with `managed_checkout` source control.
2. Create and archive an isolated `git_worktree` execution workspace.
3. Let archive cleanup remove the worktree.
4. Reopen the workspace for an issue.
**Paperclip version or commit**
`cab0c31dc61310106caef42ca244e9f7b0f19460`
**Deployment mode**
Local dev with the default embedded database.
**Agent adapter(s) involved**
Not adapter-specific. This issue affects core workspace handling.
## What Changed
- Resolve the live managed checkout when a managed project reopens an
archived Git worktree.
- Keep local-folder projects on their project workspace directory.
- Validate the Git base directory before `git rev-parse` and return a
scrubbed error.
- Add nine regression tests for workspace reopen behavior.
## Verification
- `server` TypeScript check passes with `tsc --noEmit`.
- `server/src/__tests__/execution-workspace-reopen.test.ts` passes with
9 tests.
- GitHub Actions must pass all required PR checks.
## Risks
Low risk. The change affects only archived isolated workspace reopen
behavior. It reuses the existing managed checkout and Git authentication
helpers. It adds no new credential path, endpoint, or telemetry.
## Model Used
OpenAI GPT-5 assisted with review and GitHub operations. The
implementation author supplied the code and test results.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` /
`Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the
relevant issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Fixes#2444.
Refs #4947.
The `claude_local` adapter launched Claude Code as
`claude --print - --output-format stream-json --verbose`. Paperclip writes
the rendered task prompt to Claude's stdin, but current Claude Code releases
can treat the stale `-` positional marker as the prompt itself, so Claude
received the literal string `"-"` instead of the issue body. The customer's
task ran against no content at all.
The fix keeps `--print` mode and stdin delivery, and removes the stale `-`.
Adds regression coverage on both sides of the delivery path: a `claude_local`
assertion that `--print` is present, `"-"` is absent and the prompt still
reaches stdin, and an adapter-utils case proving the sandbox run-log command
wrapper preserves stdin while streaming logs.
Authored by @elJayAdvisor, whose commit is included unchanged with their
authorship. The branch had gone stale and was showing CONFLICTING; the
conflict was in `execution-target-sandbox.test.ts`, where their new test was
added at the same point as master's `creates the process session directories
only in the launch exec` case and git interleaved the two into one hunk.
Resolved by taking master's file and re-inserting their test whole, after
checking every helper it needs still exists there.
Verified: the bug was still live on master at `execute.ts:838`; the
regression test genuinely catches it — restoring the stale `-` fails
`expect(captured.argv).not.toContain("-")`; `@paperclipai/adapter-claude-local`
and `@paperclipai/adapter-utils` typecheck clean; 67 pass across the two test
files. All CI gates green; Greptile 5/5.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Paperclip provides CLI guidance to agents and operators through
documentation and runtime messages.
> - Content-bearing `pnpm paperclipai` examples send arguments through a
shell.
> - Shell evaluation can execute command substitutions in untrusted
argument content.
> - Runtime hostname guidance can also place request-derived content
inside a shell command.
> - This pull request uses `npx paperclipai` for content-bearing
guidance and uses a static hostname placeholder.
> - The benefit is safer copy-paste guidance for agents and operators.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**Issue type**
Incorrect information
**Where is the issue?**
CLI guidance in `doc/CLI.md`, `skills/paperclip/SKILL.md`,
documentation, and runtime-generated hints.
**What's wrong?**
Content-bearing `pnpm paperclipai` commands can pass argument text
through `/bin/sh`. Shell command substitution in an argument can execute
before the CLI receives the value.
**Suggested fix**
Use `npx paperclipai` for content-bearing commands. Use a static
`<host>` placeholder when runtime guidance displays the allowed-hostname
command.
## What Changed
- Replace content-bearing `pnpm paperclipai` examples with `npx
paperclipai` across the documentation and agent-facing guidance.
- Update runtime-generated CLI hints to use a static `<host>`
placeholder.
- Add safety notes to `doc/CLI.md` and `skills/paperclip/SKILL.md`.
- Add scans and regression tests for unsafe invocation and hostile
hostname headers.
- Keep fixed lifecycle commands and `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/*` build
commands unchanged.
## Verification
- Run `tsc --noEmit` for the changed server files.
- Run `cli-invocation-safety.test.ts`.
- Run `private-hostname-guard.test.ts`.
- Confirm that hostile hostname headers do not enter shown shell
commands.
- Confirm that the three commits contain the required Paperclip
co-author trailer.
## Risks
- This change updates documentation and diagnostic text across many
surfaces.
- Fixed lifecycle and setup commands remain unchanged.
- The tests fail if content-bearing `pnpm paperclipai` guidance returns.
- The change does not alter the CLI argument parser.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, tool use, code execution, and repository review
assistance.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The tool gateway creates approval requests and the review queue
reads them
> - The gateway creates a request row before it adds the signature
> - A review-queue read can see the row during that short unsigned state
> - The old read path cancels the unsigned row, so approval returns `409
action_not_pending`
> - This pull request hides unsigned in-flight rows and keeps them
pending until signing finishes
> - The benefit is that approval succeeds while invalid signed requests
remain cancelled
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
A review-queue read cancelled a pending tool action request when the
request had no signature yet. The next approval call returned `409
action_not_pending`.
**Expected behavior**
The review queue must hide an unsigned in-flight request and keep its
state as `pending`. A request with an invalid signature must remain
cancelled.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Create a require-approval tool action request.
2. Read the review queue while the request signature is still null.
3. Approve the request after the creator adds the signature.
4. Observe that the old code cancels the request and the approval call
fails.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Commit `720aa0a494bbaa1711bc7a3d795f810765915bfe`.
**Deployment mode**
Local dev with the embedded PGlite database.
**Installation method**
Built from source with pnpm.
**Agent adapter(s) involved**
Not adapter-specific. This is a core tool access service bug.
**Database mode**
Embedded PGlite.
**Access context**
Board and agent tool approval flow.
## What Changed
- Keep a pending request with a null signature out of
`listActionRequests` results.
- Cancel a request when its non-null signature fails verification.
- Add a permanent regression test for the unsigned request transition.
- Update the contract test for unsigned and invalid-signature requests.
## Verification
- Run the tool access service, tool gateway service, tool gateway, and
tool access policy service tests.
- Confirm 227 tests pass.
- Run the `@mcp-runnable` Playwright end-to-end suite in CI.
- Run the US-9 loop 30 times in CI.
## Risks
The change alters review-queue filtering for unsigned requests. A null
signature now means that signing remains in progress. Invalid signed
requests keep the existing cancellation behavior. The change has no
database migration.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, with tool use and code execution. The model
reviewed the handoff, repository rules, and pull request state. The
implementation author supplied the code and tests.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` /
`Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the
relevant issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Agents can be configured with env bindings that reference company
secrets — they specify which secret by UUID in `adapterConfig.env`
> - But there is no API endpoint agents can call to look up a secret
UUID by name — `GET /companies/:companyId/secrets` is board-only, and
the internal `secrets.resolve` handler only accepts UUIDs
> - So when an agent needs to wire a new secret (e.g. an API key for a
new skill), it has no way to discover the UUID from a known name like
`HOMEBOX_API_KEY` — the user must find it by inspecting browser network
traffic
> - The fix is a read-only catalog endpoint that agents can call to get
the `id`/`name`/`key`/`status` mapping — no values, no provider config —
just enough to resolve a name to a UUID
> - This PR adds `GET /companies/:companyId/secrets/catalog`, guarded by
`assertBoardOrAgent` + `assertCompanyAccess`, so agents can discover the
UUID they need without board-level access and without any secret value
being exposed
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No pre-existing public issue. Describing inline per the feature request
template:
**Subsystem affected:** `server/` — REST API & orchestration services
**Problem or motivation:**
Agents that configure env bindings must reference secrets by UUID
(`secretId`). There is no agent-accessible API to resolve a secret name
to its UUID. `GET /companies/:companyId/secrets` requires board access;
the internal `secrets.resolve` handler rejects anything that is not
already a UUID. Agents and their operators are forced to find UUIDs by
inspecting browser network requests, which is friction that should not
exist.
**Proposed solution:**
Add a read-only catalog endpoint — `GET
/companies/:companyId/secrets/catalog` — that agents can call. It
returns only non-sensitive metadata (`id`, `name`, `key`, `status`) for
each active company secret, stripped of values, provider configuration,
and version history. Board callers get the same response. The existing
full-detail list endpoint (`GET /companies/:companyId/secrets`) remains
board-only and is unchanged.
**Alternatives considered:**
- Allow agents to call the existing `/secrets` list — rejected because
it returns full rows including provider metadata; narrowing the response
is safer.
- Add a name-to-UUID lookup by query param — simpler but less useful; a
full catalog means the agent can do the resolution locally without a
second round-trip.
**Roadmap alignment:** Does not duplicate anything in `ROADMAP.md`.
## What Changed
- `server/src/routes/secrets.ts` — new `GET
/companies/:companyId/secrets/catalog` route registered before the
board-only `GET /companies/:companyId/secrets` route. Uses
`assertBoardOrAgent` + `assertCompanyAccess`. Calls `svc.list()` then
projects each row to `{ id, name, key, status }` before responding.
- `server/src/__tests__/secrets-routes.test.ts` — adds `list` to the
shared mock service object (it was missing); adds a `describe` block
with four test cases: board caller receives stripped metadata, agent
caller in the same company receives stripped metadata, unauthenticated
request gets 401, agent from a different company gets 403.
## Verification
**Automated:**
```bash
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server test --run secrets-routes
```
All four new test cases (board access, agent access, unauthed rejection,
cross-company rejection) should pass.
**Manual:**
1. Start the Paperclip server locally.
2. Create a company and a secret via the UI.
3. Call the endpoint as a board user:
```bash
curl http://localhost:3100/api/companies/<companyId>/secrets/catalog \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <board-session-token>"
```
Expect a JSON array with `id`, `name`, `key`, `status` fields — no
`provider`, no `referenceCount`, no version data.
4. Call the same endpoint with an agent API key:
```bash
curl http://localhost:3100/api/companies/<companyId>/secrets/catalog \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <agent-api-key>"
```
Expect the same response.
5. Call with an agent API key scoped to a *different* company — expect
403.
## Risks
Low risk. This is a purely additive, read-only endpoint. No existing
behavior changes. The only new capability is that agents can discover
the UUIDs of secrets in their own company — metadata they already need
to do their job. Secret values are never returned. Authorization reuses
the existing `assertBoardOrAgent` and `assertCompanyAccess` guards
already used throughout the codebase.
## Model Used
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (`claude-sonnet-4-6`) — Anthropic, extended context,
tool use enabled. The entire change (route, tests, PR description) was
produced by the model operating as a Paperclip CEO agent assigned to the
task.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Austin Pilz <austinpilz@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: root <root@paperclip.pilz.dev>
Co-authored-by: Internet Historian <agent@paperclip.internal>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Aymeloglu <aaymeloglu@gmail.com>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Reviewers annotate plans and issue documents with inline comments,
and assigned agents act on that feedback
> - The server already builds a bounded review context from open plan
annotations and includes it in agent wake payloads
> - Non-plan issue documents did not get the same treatment: their open
annotation threads never reached the agent, and the properties pane did
not surface their annotations
> - This pull request extends the review-context path and the
properties-pane UI to issue documents, at parity with plans
> - The benefit is that agent feedback on any issue document reaches the
assigned agent, not only feedback on the plan
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What existing behavior does this improve?**
The review-context pipeline that delivers inline annotation feedback to
assigned agents, and the properties pane that surfaces those annotations
to reviewers.
**Subsystem affected**
The server review-context path
(`server/src/services/plan-review-context.ts`, wake payload assembly in
`server/src/services/heartbeat.ts`, `server/src/routes/issues.ts`),
shared wake-payload types (`packages/shared`, `packages/adapter-utils`),
and the issue properties pane (`ui/src/components/issue-properties/`).
**Current behavior**
A reviewer can annotate any issue document, not only the plan. The agent
wake payload includes open annotation threads for the plan document
only. Feedback left on other issue documents is invisible to the
assigned agent. In the properties pane, the Artifacts tab also gives no
way to see or open a document's annotations.
**Proposed behavior**
Add `buildDocumentReviewContext` beside the existing plan builder. It
collects open annotation threads for all non-plan issue documents,
applies the same thread, comment, and character budgets across
documents, and reports truncation. Include the result as a new
`documentReviewContext` field in agent wake payloads and in the issue
wake-context route. Keep the plan context on its legacy builder and
field so plan-only wakes stay byte-for-byte compatible. Render the new
context in the adapter wake-payload text, and surface annotation counts
and the annotation panel for documents in the properties pane's Plans
and Artifacts tabs.
**Reason and benefit**
The floating annotation popover and persistent highlight UI landed
earlier; this change completes the loop so agent feedback on any issue
document reaches the assigned agent, not only feedback on the plan.
**Breaking changes**
None. The wake payload gains a new optional `documentReviewContext`
field; the existing plan context field and its legacy builder are
unchanged, so plan-only wakes stay byte-for-byte compatible.
## What Changed
- Add `buildDocumentReviewContext` in
`server/src/services/plan-review-context.ts`: bounded review context
(shared thread/comment/character budgets, per-document legacy limits)
over all non-plan issue documents
- Include `documentReviewContext` in agent wake payloads
(`server/src/services/heartbeat.ts`) and in the issue wake-context
response (`server/src/routes/issues.ts`)
- Add shared `DocumentReviewContext` / `DocumentReviewContextDocument`
types in `packages/shared`
- Normalize and render the new context in adapter wake-payload text
(`packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.ts`), with tests
- Show a `DocumentAnnotationsCountChip` and the annotation panel for
documents in the properties pane Plans and Artifacts tabs, with tests
- Extend server document-annotations service tests to cover the new
context builder
## Verification
- Run `npx vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/document-annotations-service.test.ts` from the repo
root — 104 tests pass
- Run `TZ=UTC npx vitest run
ui/src/components/issue-properties/IssuePropertiesDocumentAnnotations.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueDocumentAnnotations.test.tsx
ui/src/components/DocumentAnnotationPopover.test.tsx` from the repo root
— 75 tests pass (one pre-existing monitor-row case asserts UTC
timestamps, so use `TZ=UTC` locally; CI runs in UTC)
- `pnpm run typecheck` in `server/` passes
- Manual: annotate a non-plan issue document, then wake the assigned
agent with a comment — the wake payload lists the open document
annotation threads; the Artifacts tab shows the annotation count chip
and opens the panel
## Risks
- The wake payload gains a new optional `documentReviewContext` field;
consumers that ignore unknown fields are unaffected, and the plan
context field is unchanged
- The context is new input to agent wakes; shared budgets (same limits
as the plan context) bound token cost across all documents
- Low UI risk: the properties-pane changes reuse the existing annotation
components
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- Claude (Anthropic), model ID `claude-fable-5` (Claude Fable 5), with
extended thinking and agentic tool use (Claude Code harness)
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The server provides issue APIs and the database stores issue child
rows
> - The issue delete endpoint removes the parent issue before dependent
rows
> - Several issue foreign keys had no delete policy, so PostgreSQL
returned a foreign-key error
> - This pull request adds safe cascade and set-null policies and a
clear conflict response
> - The benefit is reliable issue deletion with a useful error when a
restricted audit row still blocks deletion
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Fixes#7728Fixes#4660Fixes#7991Fixes#4627Fixes#5086
**What happened?**
`DELETE /api/issues/:id` returned HTTP 500 when dependent comments,
thread interactions, read states, inbox archives, feedback votes, or
ledger rows referenced the issue. The database raised SQLSTATE 23503
because several foreign keys had no delete policy.
**Expected behavior**
The endpoint must remove dependent rows that have no meaning without the
issue. It must keep ledger rows with a null issue reference. It must
return HTTP 409 when a restricted decision audit row still references
the issue.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Create an issue.
2. Add a comment or thread interaction that references the issue.
3. Send `DELETE /api/issues/:id`.
4. Observe the HTTP 500 response.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Commit `1f8f456f8340823fe2bd891ae8933d942f190b7b`.
**Deployment mode**
Local dev with embedded PGlite or external PostgreSQL.
## What Changed
- Add `CASCADE` to five issue child foreign keys.
- Add `SET NULL` to the finance and cost event issue foreign keys.
- Keep decision audit references restricted.
- Map SQLSTATE 23503 from the issue delete service to HTTP 409.
- Add migration 0217 for the seven changed tables.
- Add regression tests for cascade deletion and restricted decision
references.
## Verification
- Run `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck`.
- Run `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`.
- Run `npx vitest run src/__tests__/issue-remove-cascade.test.ts` from
`server/`.
- The regression test applies migration 0217 to a fresh embedded
PostgreSQL database.
## Risks
- Migration 0217 changes only seven foreign keys that reference
`issues.id`.
- Cascade deletion removes child rows that cannot exist without the
parent issue.
- Set-null preserves finance and cost ledger rows.
- Decision audit rows remain protected, so the endpoint can return HTTP
409.
## Model Used
Codex, based on GPT-5, with tool use and code-review support. The
implementation author used an AI coding agent. This PR handoff uses the
same model family to validate the commit and manage the pull request.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` /
`Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the
relevant issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Board users and board API keys coordinate agents by commenting on
and updating issues.
> - `issue:comment` and `issue:mutate` are intentionally null-mapped
authorization actions, so they need explicit same-company fallback
handling.
> - Same-company board-key writes worked for unassigned or same-actor
issues but failed for issues assigned to another agent.
> - That blocked cross-agent coordination because a board key could not
comment on or patch another agent's issue even inside the same company.
> - This pull request adds the missing board-member issue-write fallback
while keeping viewers denied and sparse service calls fail-closed.
> - The benefit is that non-viewer board members can coordinate agent
work across assignees without restoring broad instance-admin elevation.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public GitHub issue exists. Duplicate search performed:
- `gh search prs --repo paperclipai/paperclip "board key issue mutate"`
returned only this PR.
- `gh search issues --repo paperclipai/paperclip "board key
authorization boundary"` returned no issues.
Bug description:
### What happened
Same-company board-key actors received `403 "Issue is outside this
actor's authorization boundary"` when posting comments or patching
issues assigned to another agent.
### Expected behavior
Active same-company non-viewer board members can comment on and mutate
issues in their company, regardless of agent assignee; viewer members
remain denied.
### Steps to reproduce
Authenticate as a board API key for an active non-viewer company member,
then `POST /api/issues/{id}/comments` or `PATCH /api/issues/{id}`
against an issue assigned to a different agent in the same company.
### Paperclip version or commit
Observed against the current published 2026.626.0 package line and fixed
against current `master`.
### Deployment mode
Authenticated/tailnet board-key access.
## What Changed
- Added a board-actor fallback for `issue:comment` and `issue:mutate` in
`server/src/services/authorization.ts`.
- Restricted that fallback to fully contextualized issue resources with
issue id, status, and explicit assignee fields so sparse service calls
still fail closed.
- Allowed active same-company non-viewer board memberships and denied
viewer memberships for these issue-write actions.
- Added regression coverage for non-viewer board-key comment/mutate on
an issue assigned to another agent.
- Added regression coverage for viewer denial on both `issue:comment`
and `issue:mutate`.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/authorization-service.test.ts` passed: 35/35.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` passed.
- `git diff --check` passed.
## Risks
Low-to-moderate authorization risk because this changes issue-write
access. The scope is constrained to active same-company board
memberships, excludes viewers, and requires route-shaped issue context
before granting access. Cross-company access and sparse/null-mapped
calls continue to fail closed.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex coding agent using GPT-5-class reasoning with local shell,
GitHub CLI, and test execution tools in an OpenClaw/Codex environment.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Co-authored-by: ApolinarioRatio <ApolinarioRatio@users.noreply.github.com>
Bumps
[@aws-sdk/client-s3](https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-js-v3/tree/HEAD/clients/client-s3)
from 3.1075.0 to 3.1106.0.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-js-v3/releases">@aws-sdk/client-s3's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v3.1106.0</h2>
<h4>3.1106.0(2026-08-07)</h4>
<h5>New Features</h5>
<ul>
<li><strong>clients:</strong> update client endpoints as of 2026-08-07
(<a
href="c5d05426d8">c5d05426</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-amplify:</strong> Increased the maximum allowed
length of the oauthToken parameter in the CreateApp and UpdateApp APIs
to support longer OAuth tokens issued by third-party Git providers. (<a
href="b239e29295">b239e292</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-healthlake:</strong> Adds provenanceEnabled to
StartFHIRImportJob (<a
href="18ac6efeb9">18ac6efe</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-securityagent:</strong> Added enableEmailMfa input
field on Actor to enable email-based MFA during penetration tests. When
enabled, a server-generated mfaForwardingAddress is returned. Set up a
forwarding rule in your email provider to forward MFA emails to this
address so the agent can complete email-based MFA login flows (<a
href="e21d39190e">e21d3919</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-mediapackagev2:</strong> StreamNameOutputMode - a new
optional field on MediaPackageV2 OriginEndpoints that lets customers
choose whether egress manifests use numeric stream indices (default) or
encoder-assigned stream names from the input (<a
href="7f49cb0607">7f49cb06</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-sagemaker:</strong> Amazon SageMaker adds maintenance
lifecycle statuses for Notebook Instances (<a
href="6ce0f8843a">6ce0f884</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-ec2:</strong> This release adds support for BGP route
protection in Amazon VPC IP Address Manager (IPAM), including route
discovery, RPKI route protection findings, and delegated RPKI (Internet
Registry Associations, routing policy registrations, and ROA management)
for BYOIP prefixes. (<a
href="62f281df5a">62f281df</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-mediatailor:</strong> Added support for inserting ads
via the VAST Ad Buffet standard. You can now configure MediaTailor to
insert ads in sequence order using the AdSequencingMode setting in your
playback configuration. Standalone ads are used as fallbacks when a
sequenced ad is unavailable. (<a
href="7bebb1e56d">7bebb1e5</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-connect:</strong> Supports updating the task template
associated with in-progress task contacts using the new
UpdateContactTaskTemplate API. This enables supervisors and developers
to dynamically reassign task templates without creating a new task. (<a
href="24f4041681">24f40416</a>)</li>
</ul>
<hr />
<p>For list of updated packages, view
<strong>updated-packages.md</strong> in
<strong>assets-3.1106.0.zip</strong></p>
<h2>v3.1105.0</h2>
<h4>3.1105.0(2026-08-06)</h4>
<h5>Chores</h5>
<ul>
<li><strong>lib-dynamodb:</strong> add error msg and fallback when
incompatible client is supplied (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/aws/aws-sdk-js-v3/pull/8231">#8231</a>)
(<a
href="e663d41f0c">e663d41f</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h5>New Features</h5>
<ul>
<li><strong>clients:</strong> update client endpoints as of 2026-08-06
(<a
href="e4f7b32fca">e4f7b32f</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-cloudwatch-logs:</strong> This release adds index
category support to the CloudWatch Logs DescribeFieldIndexes API.
Customers can filter and identify DEFAULT, CUSTOM, AUTO, and INACTIVE
field indexes. (<a
href="e17fff6fee">e17fff6f</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-socialmessaging:</strong> Add support for WhatsApp
Conversions APIs. (<a
href="5c29a86986">5c29a869</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-gamelift:</strong> Adds support for C8a, C8i, C9g,
M8a, M8i, and M9g EC2 instance type families for managed EC2 and
container fleets. Also adds explicit anchors on most string regexes. (<a
href="30dfd63ab8">30dfd63a</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-securityhub:</strong> Security Hub is adding a new
public API, ListFreeTrialStatusesV2 to describe the free trial statuses
of the Security Hub service and its opt-in features. (<a
href="e44b3582d5">e44b3582</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-bedrock-agentcore-control:</strong> Add support for
Gateway rate limits and Runtime instances in Amazon Bedrock AgentCore.
Customers can now configure rate limits scoped to control request rates,
token consumption rates, and active connection rates. Customers can now
create capacity providers to launch runtimes on their EC2 instances. (<a
href="865d21efa6">865d21ef</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-device-farm:</strong> Adds support for service
generated insights across runs, jobs, and tests. (<a
href="6c601b7101">6c601b71</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-sagemaker:</strong> Releases new Model Customization
SequenceLength parameter for Training and g7 instance types for Training
and Processing. (<a
href="14bd2ac7dc">14bd2ac7</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-agent-registry-control:</strong> Agent Registry's
Public Preview release (<a
href="a137863d85">a137863d</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-backup:</strong> AWS Backup now lets you create
read-only access points for Amazon S3 recovery points, enabling you to
access backup data using S3 APIs without initiating a restore. (<a
href="636228a953">636228a9</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-mediatailor:</strong> AWS Elemental MediaTailor now
supports concurrent function execution. The new Concurrent Executor
function type runs multiple independent child functions in parallel
within a single lifecycle hook, reducing pipeline latency to the
duration of the slowest call instead of the sum of all calls. (<a
href="1cf61475d4">1cf61475</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-marketplace-agreement:</strong> GetAgreementTerms now
returns a new term variant in AcceptedTerm, netPaymentTerm, with a
paymentDuePeriod field (example "P30D"). (<a
href="50b0d6d565">50b0d6d5</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-agent-registry:</strong> Agent Registry's Public
Preview release (<a
href="632ae47917">632ae479</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-kafka:</strong> MSK Clusters can now deliver
authorizer logs alongside broker logs to the destinations defined by you
(<a
href="b7e3193783">b7e31937</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-bedrock-agentcore:</strong> Add support for capacity
provider sessions in Amazon Bedrock AgentCore. Customers can now delete
an active session running on a runtime instance launched through their
capacity provider. (<a
href="bd301533b8">bd301533</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-auto-scaling:</strong> EC2 Auto Scaling now supports
being managed by other AWS services via the operator field. (<a
href="f5d54fce5f">f5d54fce</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-ec2:</strong> Adds a new optional IncludeLocalZones
parameter to the Spot Placement Score API that defaults to false. When
set to true, the Spot Placement Score API will consider the relevant
Local Zones with Spot capacity when computing the Spot Placement Score.
(<a
href="43673842a0">43673842</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-marketplace-discovery:</strong> GetOfferTerms now
returns netPaymentTerm in offerTerms, specifying payment due period
after invoice date. The paymentDuePeriod field uses ISO 8601 duration
format (e.g., "P30D" for net 30 days). This is a
backward-compatible addition. See API documentation for full structure
and examples. (<a
href="f4fd7ae7b8">f4fd7ae7</a>)</li>
<li><strong>client-s3:</strong> AWS Backup now lets you create read-only
access points for Amazon S3 recovery points, enabling you to access
backup data using S3 APIs without initiating a restore. (<a
href="faf6560269">faf65602</a>)</li>
</ul>
<!-- raw HTML omitted -->
</blockquote>
<p>... (truncated)</p>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Changelog</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-js-v3/blob/main/clients/client-s3/CHANGELOG.md">@aws-sdk/client-s3's
changelog</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h1><a
href="https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-js-v3/compare/v3.1105.0...v3.1106.0">3.1106.0</a>
(2026-08-07)</h1>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> Version bump only for package
<code>@aws-sdk/client-s3</code></p>
<h1><a
href="https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-js-v3/compare/v3.1104.0...v3.1105.0">3.1105.0</a>
(2026-08-06)</h1>
<h3>Features</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>client-s3:</strong> AWS Backup now lets you create read-only
access points for Amazon S3 recovery points, enabling you to access
backup data using S3 APIs without initiating a restore. (<a
href="faf6560269">faf6560</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h1><a
href="https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-js-v3/compare/v3.1103.0...v3.1104.0">3.1104.0</a>
(2026-08-05)</h1>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> Version bump only for package
<code>@aws-sdk/client-s3</code></p>
<h1><a
href="https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-js-v3/compare/v3.1102.0...v3.1103.0">3.1103.0</a>
(2026-08-04)</h1>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> Version bump only for package
<code>@aws-sdk/client-s3</code></p>
<h1><a
href="https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-js-v3/compare/v3.1101.0...v3.1102.0">3.1102.0</a>
(2026-08-03)</h1>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> Version bump only for package
<code>@aws-sdk/client-s3</code></p>
<h1><a
href="https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-js-v3/compare/v3.1100.0...v3.1101.0">3.1101.0</a>
(2026-07-31)</h1>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> Version bump only for package
<code>@aws-sdk/client-s3</code></p>
<!-- raw HTML omitted -->
</blockquote>
<p>... (truncated)</p>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="655d311ea0"><code>655d311</code></a>
Publish v3.1106.0</li>
<li><a
href="d6c0ea3622"><code>d6c0ea3</code></a>
Publish v3.1105.0</li>
<li><a
href="faf6560269"><code>faf6560</code></a>
feat(client-s3): AWS Backup now lets you create read-only access points
for A...</li>
<li><a
href="b3929bd0a7"><code>b3929bd</code></a>
Publish v3.1104.0</li>
<li><a
href="672c90ddc7"><code>672c90d</code></a>
Publish v3.1103.0</li>
<li><a
href="c5285315f7"><code>c528531</code></a>
Publish v3.1102.0</li>
<li><a
href="272a6ebbae"><code>272a6eb</code></a>
Publish v3.1101.0</li>
<li><a
href="6969cf9ed5"><code>6969cf9</code></a>
Publish v3.1100.0</li>
<li><a
href="5b15ca73a3"><code>5b15ca7</code></a>
Publish v3.1099.0</li>
<li><a
href="ee76673ea9"><code>ee76673</code></a>
Publish v3.1098.0</li>
<li>Additional commits viewable in <a
href="https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-js-v3/commits/v3.1106.0/clients/client-s3">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Bumps [dompurify](https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify) from 3.4.12 to
3.4.13.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/releases">dompurify's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>DOMPurify 3.4.13</h2>
<ul>
<li>Fixed an issue with hook removal during <code>IN_PLACE</code>
sanitization, thanks <a
href="https://github.com/koyokr"><code>@koyokr</code></a></li>
<li>Fixed an issue with hooks potentially bypassing the clone guard,
thanks <a
href="https://github.com/AkshayjainG"><code>@AkshayjainG</code></a></li>
<li>Fixed an issue with DOM clobbering via <code>ownerDocument</code>
during <code>IN_PLACE</code>, thanks <a
href="https://github.com/AkshayjainG"><code>@AkshayjainG</code></a></li>
<li>Bumped several dependencies where possible</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="3067f77467"><code>3067f77</code></a>
release: 3.4.13 (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/1562">#1562</a>)</li>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/compare/3.4.12...3.4.13">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the
[Security Alerts
page](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/network/alerts).
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Bumps
[@types/express-serve-static-core](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/tree/HEAD/types/express-serve-static-core)
from 5.1.1 to 5.1.3.
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/commits/HEAD/types/express-serve-static-core">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The issue update route is part of the workflow layer that records
board state changes and emits follow-up wakes for agents.
> - A single `PATCH /api/issues/:id` request can both close an issue and
add the closure comment that explains the final disposition.
> - The bug was that the comment-wakeup decision used the issue's
pre-update status, so a request that changed `in_progress` to `done`
could still enqueue an `issue_commented` wake as if the issue remained
open.
> - That stale wake could cause already-completed Sentry-family
follow-up issues to drift back into active work even though the closure
comment was the only new activity.
> - This pull request makes the wake suppression decision use the
post-update issue status and covers the closure-comment path with a
focused regression test.
> - The benefit is that terminal issue updates stay terminal unless a
separate explicit reopen or resume path is used.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public GitHub issue exists for this instance-specific workflow bug,
so the issue is described inline.
Bug report:
- What happened: when an issue was marked `done` with a closure comment
in the same `PATCH /api/issues/:id` request, the route could still
enqueue an `issue_commented` wake because it checked the pre-update
status.
- Expected behavior: a closure comment written as part of the terminal
update should not wake the assignee again or clear the terminal
disposition.
- Steps to reproduce: start with an assigned issue in `in_progress`,
patch it to `done` while including a comment, then inspect whether an
`issue_commented` wake is emitted for the assignee.
- Deployment mode: local Paperclip workflow/API behavior.
- Related public PRs found during duplicate search: #6657 appears to
address a broader stale closeout-comment reopen path; this PR is
narrower and targets the same-request post-update status decision in
`PATCH /api/issues/:id`.
## What Changed
- Use the post-update issue status when deciding whether a PATCH comment
should enqueue an `issue_commented` wake.
- Add a regression test covering `in_progress` to `done` with a closure
comment so the assignee is not woken again after the issue is already
closed.
## Verification
- `bin/ci`: absent in this repo, so I used the repo's targeted
test-equivalent commands for the touched API route.
- `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts`: passed, with
non-fatal warnings about missing `paperclip-plugin-dev-server` bins
because `packages/plugins/sdk/dist/dev-cli.js` is not built under
`--ignore-scripts`.
- `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/issue-update-comment-wakeup-routes.test.ts`: passed
(`Test Files 1 passed`, `Tests 8 passed`).
- GitHub PR workflow checks for build, typecheck, server tests,
workspace tests, serialized suites, e2e, canary dry run, security scans,
and policy are green on commit
`5a8bd799edd606731fd5e215ea97417a655338ea`.
- A normal `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` is blocked on this host
before tests because `sharp` attempts a native build under Node `26.1.0`
/ Python `3.14.5` and fails on missing Python `distutils`; the
route-level verification above used `--ignore-scripts` to avoid that
local toolchain issue.
## Risks
Low risk. The behavior change is limited to comment-wakeup suppression
during issue update handling and only narrows wake emission when the
post-update status is terminal. The main edge case is that a
same-request terminal update with a comment will no longer wake the
assignee; explicit reopen or resume flows should remain the correct way
to restart completed work.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex via the managed local Codex adapter, model `gpt-5.5` with
repository tool use and shell execution. The implementation and PR
update were produced with AI assistance under the TechWright CTO
Architect role.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Checklist notes:
- The branch was already opened as `worker/TEC-1440-reopen-drift`; I am
leaving the box unchecked rather than hiding that the live PR branch
includes an internal coordination id.
- The only non-green automated check before this body update was the
automated review/template gate. Greptile was 4/5 because of this
PR-description issue, with no code change requested.
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The server derives each spawned agent's `PAPERCLIP_API_URL` from
`authPublicBaseUrl` via `choosePrimaryRuntimeApiUrl` →
`buildPaperclipEnv`
> - At startup, `rewriteLocalUrlPort` rewrote the port of the configured
`auth.publicBaseUrl` to the internal listen port
> - The rewrite was applied to *any* explicit-port URL, not just
loopback ones — so an external base URL on a non-default port (e.g. a
Tailscale Serve listener on `:8443`) got clobbered to the internal HTTP
port `:3101`
> - `https://host:3101` (HTTPS scheme against the plaintext HTTP port)
is unreachable, and that dead value propagated to every spawned agent's
`PAPERCLIP_API_URL`
> - This pull request preserves explicit external base URLs at startup
while keeping the worktree path's intended per-worktree port rewrite
> - The benefit is that agents following the documented `curl
"$PAPERCLIP_API_URL/..."` pattern no longer hit a dead endpoint
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public GitHub issue; describing inline (bug report).
**Summary:** at server startup, `rewriteLocalUrlPort` corrupts an
explicit external `auth.publicBaseUrl`, leaking a dead
`PAPERCLIP_API_URL` to spawned agents.
**Steps to reproduce:**
1. Configure `auth.publicBaseUrl = https://<host>:8443` (an external
listener on a non-default port, e.g. Tailscale Serve).
2. Start the server (internal listen port `3101`).
3. Inspect a spawned agent run's env:
`PAPERCLIP_API_URL=https://<host>:3101`.
**Expected:** the agent-facing URL points at a reachable origin.
**Actual:** `curl "$PAPERCLIP_API_URL/..."` → `http_code=000` (HTTPS
against the plaintext HTTP port; TLS handshake fails). The fleet stays
healthy only because the runtime falls through its candidate list, but
any agent following the documented curl pattern silently hits a dead
endpoint first.
Related open PRs in the same area (dedup — none merged; this is a
smaller, targeted fix with regression tests):
- Refs #9916 (PAPERCLIP_RUNTIME_API_URL precedence + authPublicBaseUrl
port preservation)
- Refs #7342 (preserve explicit authPublicBaseUrl during startup,
GH#7341)
- Refs #9228 (prefer reachable runtime API URLs for local adapters)
## What Changed
- New `server/src/url-utils.ts` with two intent-revealing helpers
(single source of truth):
- `rewriteUrlPort` — rewrite any explicit-port URL to a new port.
- `rewriteLoopbackUrlPort` — rewrite **only** loopback hosts; explicit
external URLs survive untouched.
- `isLoopbackHost` — bracket-tolerant so a URL hostname form `[::1]`
matches.
- `server/src/index.ts` (startup, the bug): `authPublicBaseUrl` now uses
`rewriteLoopbackUrlPort`, so an external Serve URL keeps its port.
Nested helper copies removed in favor of the shared module.
- `server/src/worktree-config.ts` (worktree path): uses `rewriteUrlPort`
— **behavior unchanged**; a worktree still advertises its own server
port even on a non-loopback host (this is intended and asserted by the
existing worktree suite).
- `server/src/url-utils.test.ts`: regression coverage for both helpers.
- Updated one stale assertion in
`server-startup-feedback-export.test.ts` that had encoded the old
(buggy) external-host rewrite at startup.
## Verification
- `vitest run src/url-utils.test.ts
src/__tests__/worktree-config.test.ts
src/__tests__/server-startup-feedback-export.test.ts` → **33 passed**;
the only local failure is a pre-existing, environment-coupled test
(`derives trusted origins…`) that leaks the dev machine's real Tailscale
identity into an origins list and passes in CI (it is unrelated to this
change — its `authPublicBaseUrl` is loopback and rewrites identically
before/after).
- `npm run typecheck` (`tsc --noEmit`) → **clean, exit 0**.
- PR CI: Build, Typecheck + Release Registry, serialized server suites,
and `review` gate green.
## Risks
Low risk. The only behavioral change is at startup: an explicit
*external* base URL on a non-default port is no longer rewritten to the
internal listen port (the bug). Loopback/worktree behavior is unchanged.
No schema/migration changes.
## Model Used
Claude Opus 4.8, 1M context (`claude-opus-4-8[1m]`), extended thinking,
with tool use / code execution (Claude Code).
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - One of its pluggability surfaces is external adapter packages,
loaded at startup by `server/src/adapters/plugin-loader.ts` and routed
through the adapter registry so third parties can override built-in
adapters like `claude_local`
> - `loadExternalAdapterPackage` calls `await import(modulePath)` where
`modulePath` is an absolute filesystem path
> - On Windows that path begins with a drive letter (`C:\…`), which
Node's ESM loader parses as a URL scheme and rejects with
`ERR_UNSUPPORTED_ESM_URL_SCHEME`; the defensive `try/catch` around the
call masks the failure and the builtin adapter silently keeps serving
traffic, so the override never activates
> - `reloadExternalAdapter` in the same file already tries to build a
`file://` URL, but does it via template-string concatenation
(`file://${modulePath}`) which produces a malformed URL on Windows
(`file://C:\…` instead of `file:///C:/…`) — so dev hot-reload of
adapters is broken on Windows even after initial load works on POSIX
> - This pull request swaps both paths to `pathToFileURL()` from
`node:url`, the idiomatic cross-platform conversion
> - The benefit is external adapter packages load reliably on Windows
with no changes required to existing adapters, and the two sibling paths
in the same file stop diverging in their URL-handling discipline
Closes#4286.
## What Changed
- `server/src/adapters/plugin-loader.ts`:
- Import `pathToFileURL` from `node:url`.
- `loadExternalAdapterPackage`: wrap `modulePath` in
`pathToFileURL(modulePath).href` before passing to `import()`.
- `reloadExternalAdapter`: replace `` `file://${modulePath}` `` string
concatenation with `pathToFileURL(modulePath).href` so the cache-bust
URL is well-formed on Windows too (drive letter, UNC, percent-encoding).
Three lines changed + one import. No behavior change on POSIX:
`pathToFileURL("/foo/bar.js").href === "file:///foo/bar.js"`, which
Node's ESM loader accepts identically to the bare path.
## Verification
**Runtime, Windows 11, Node v24, `@paperclipai/server@2026.416.0`:**
Before (installed dist, vanilla):
```
INFO: Loading external adapter package {packageName: "@reforged/adapter-claude-local", modulePath: "C:\\Users\\…\\index.js"}
WARN: Failed to dynamically load external adapter; skipping
err: ERR_UNSUPPORTED_ESM_URL_SCHEME … Received protocol 'c:'
```
After (same dist with the equivalent two-line patch applied):
```
INFO: Loading external adapter package {packageName: "@reforged/adapter-claude-local"}
INFO: Loaded external adapters from plugin store {count: 1, adapters: ["claude_local"]}
```
End-to-end: the override actually services execute calls and its
telemetry fields (e.g. `errorCode: "rate_limited"` on 429) surface into
heartbeat-run records — I've been running this heartbeat through the
override on a vendor-patched copy while drafting this PR.
**Static / logic review:**
- `pathToFileURL` is part of Node's stdlib since v10.12.0, no new dep.
- On POSIX, `path.resolve("/a", "b") → "/a/b"` and
`pathToFileURL("/a/b").href → "file:///a/b"`. `await
import("file:///a/b")` and `await import("/a/b")` both resolve to the
same ESM module — no double-load risk.
- Reload path: the existing cache-bust query (`?t=${Date.now()}`) still
appends cleanly because `pathToFileURL(...).href` returns a normalized
`file:///…` URL with no pre-existing query string.
**Local test suite:** I did not run the full `pnpm test` suite in this
fork — the monorepo test infrastructure (embedded Postgres, pnpm
workspace install) is a significant local-setup cost and this change is
surgical enough that CI should be the source of truth. Happy to iterate
based on CI signal. No existing test directly exercises
`plugin-loader.ts`'s initial-load path.
## Risks
**Low.** This aligns the initial-load path with the already-existing
intent of the reload path (which tried, but imperfectly, to use a
`file://` URL). POSIX behavior is unchanged. The only runtime difference
is that Windows stops throwing and starts loading the adapter — which is
exactly the bug being fixed.
Edge cases worth naming:
- **UNC paths** (`\\server\share\…`): previously broken the same way on
the load path, still broken with `file://` string concat on the reload
path. `pathToFileURL` handles UNC correctly (→
`file:////server/share/…`), so this change also quietly fixes UNC-path
adapter installs on Windows.
- **Bun**: the reload path has a Bun cache-eviction block that keys off
`modulePath` and the old `fileUrl`. Bun accepts both `file://` URLs and
bare paths in its module cache keys, so changing the URL form is
consistent with the existing evict-both pattern (we still evict both
`fileUrl` and `modulePath` after the change).
## Model Used
Claude Opus 4.7 (`claude-opus-4-7`, provider: Anthropic) via Claude
Code, running as the CTO agent in a Paperclip-orchestrated company. 200k
context, tool use. No extended thinking mode. Model authored the patch,
the issue body, and this PR description; human review by the company's
principal (fronc) is pending.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass — *deferred to CI, see
Verification note*
- [ ] I have added or updated tests where applicable — *no existing
tests for this file; adding one would require stubbing
`adapter-plugin-store` + filesystem, which seemed out of scope for a
3-line fix. Happy to add one on request.*
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots — *not UI, N/A*
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes — *no
user-facing docs affected; behavior unchanged on POSIX and now-working
on Windows*
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Issue execution uses isolated workspaces that hold the issue
worktree
> - A terminal issue can leave its isolated workspace archived and
unable to resume
> - The existing closed-workspace guards returned a conflict and gave
the user no self-serve recovery
> - This pull request reopens the same isolated workspace row and
rebuilds its worktree
> - The benefit is that resume, checkout, and comment actions can
continue without a new workspace row
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**Problem or motivation**
A terminal issue can point to an archived isolated execution workspace.
Resume, checkout, and comment actions then stop with a conflict.
**What happened?**
A terminal issue kept its issue-to-workspace link after the isolated
workspace reached a closed status. The guarded actions returned HTTP 409
instead of restoring access.
**Expected behavior**
The next authorized resume, checkout, or comment action reopens the same
isolated workspace row. The action rebuilds the worktree and then
continues.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Create an issue that uses an isolated execution workspace.
2. Move the issue to a terminal state and let the workspace archive.
3. Try to resume the issue or add a comment.
4. Observe the closed-workspace conflict.
**Paperclip version or commit**
e6e79f458e
**Deployment mode**
Built from source with pnpm.
**Proposed solution**
Reopen the closed isolated workspace in place. Rebuild the worktree
before the route reports success.
**Alternatives considered**
Create a new workspace row. This would require repointing the issue link
and would not preserve access for issues that share the original row.
**Roadmap alignment**
ROADMAP.md has no matching reopen item.
## What Changed
- Reopen closed isolated workspace rows in place and rebuild their
worktrees.
- Use the reopen path from resume, checkout, and comment guards.
- Return a clear error when the rebuild fails and keep the workspace
closed.
- Fence terminal reaping and archive cleanup while a reopen is in
flight.
- Update the comment composer to allow the next action to reopen the
workspace.
- Add service and route tests for reopen, scope, failure, and lifecycle
races.
## Verification
- Server TypeScript check passes with the tsc --noEmit command.
- UI TypeScript check passes with the tsc --noEmit command.
- Seventy-two server tests pass across the affected test files.
- The isolated worktree UI test suite has a dependency mismatch and
fails before tests run with the error TypeError: act is not a function.
- CI confirms the UI test job after a clean dependency install.
## Risks
The reopen path changes behavior for closed isolated workspaces. A
rebuild failure returns an error and keeps the row closed. Lifecycle
locks and generation checks protect the worktree from stale cleanup. The
UI test mismatch needs CI confirmation.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, with tool use and code review assistance. The
runtime did not provide the context window size.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with Fixes: # / Closes #
/ Refs # OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue
template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub references)
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Paperclip Cloud provisions a dedicated tenant stack for each
customer. During signup it asks for a mission, a name and role for the
first agent, and a first task.
> - Cloud pushes those answers into the new stack at activation, as
`POST /api/companies/:companyId/onboarding-seed`.
> - No route served that path. The tenant answered 404, so Cloud
recorded the push as unacknowledged and retried on every portfolio
fetch.
> - The failure was soft. The answers stayed durable in Cloud and the
stack still activated. But the stack opened on the empty first-run
wizard, and it asked the customer again for what they had already given.
> - This pull request adds the receiving endpoint. It validates the
seed, applies it, and acknowledges it.
> - The benefit is that a seeded stack opens with the mission, the agent
and the first task already in place.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public GitHub issue covers this. The problem is described in-PR,
following the feature template.
**Subsystem affected**
server/ — Express REST API and orchestration services. Also
`packages/db` (one new table) and `packages/shared` (one new validator).
**Problem or motivation**
Paperclip Cloud collects onboarding answers at signup and pushes them to
the tenant stack at activation. The tenant had no route for that
request. It answered 404. Cloud treats a non-2xx as "not yet applied",
so it kept the answers and retried, but the stack itself stayed
unseeded. A customer who had already named their mission, their first
agent and their first task arrived at an empty first-run wizard that
asked for all three again.
**Proposed solution**
Serve `POST /api/companies/:companyId/onboarding-seed`. Validate the
body, apply it to the company, then acknowledge it.
The seed is customer free text, so it is bounded and validated in
`packages/shared` and read from the JSON body only. It is never read
from an `x-paperclip-cloud-*` header. That header set is the trusted
identity envelope: every member is derived server-side from the host
plus verified domain records, and that is exactly what makes it
trustworthy. Mixing user content into it would remove the property. A
test plants a mission on a cloud header and asserts that the body value
wins.
Application reuses the shapes the first-run wizard already produces, so
a seeded stack and a manually onboarded one look the same afterwards:
- The mission becomes the company-level goal. A multi-line mission
splits into a title and a description, as the wizard does.
- The agent becomes the company's first hire. Its free-text role ("Chief
of Staff") lands on `title`. The structural `role` stays `ceo`, which is
what the org chart and the default-instructions lookup read.
- The first task becomes an issue in the Onboarding project, assigned to
that agent.
Cloud retries until it gets a 2xx, and it reads any 2xx as "the tenant
holds this content". So the endpoint is idempotent per `revision`. A new
`company_onboarding_seeds` table records the applied revision together
with the goal, the agent and the issue it produced. A replay of a
revision that already matches is a successful no-op. A later revision —
the customer edited their answers — updates those three rows in place
instead of creating a second agent and a second task. The record is
written last, after every other write has landed, so a partial
application cannot present itself as acknowledged.
Everything is applied before the 200 is sent. This is an ordering
guarantee, not eventual consistency. The tests read the database
immediately after the response, with no waiting and no polling, so a
lazy receiver fails them on a fast machine as well as a slow one. That
matters because the redirect into the tenant dashboard is gated on this
acknowledgement.
**Alternatives considered**
Store the seed and let the tenant UI apply it on first load. Rejected:
the dashboard redirect is gated on the acknowledgement, so a background
apply would let the dashboard open before the agent and the task exist.
The whole point is that it must not.
Reuse `POST /companies/:companyId/agents` and `POST
/companies/:companyId/issues` over HTTP from Cloud. Rejected: it needs
three round trips with no shared idempotency key, and it moves the "did
all of it land?" decision to the caller.
**Roadmap alignment**
This completes an existing Cloud-to-tenant contract. It does not add a
new user-facing surface.
## What Changed
- Add `POST /api/companies/:companyId/onboarding-seed` in
`server/src/routes/onboarding-seed.ts`. It authenticates exactly as
`POST /api/companies/:companyId/logo` does, through
`assertCompanyAccess`.
- Add `server/src/services/onboarding-seed.ts`. It applies the mission,
the agent and the first task, and records the applied revision last.
- Add the `company_onboarding_seeds` table: schema, migration `0216`,
and journal entry. It holds the applied revision and the ids of the
goal, agent and issue the seed produced.
- Add `applyOnboardingSeedSchema` in `packages/shared`. It bounds
mission to 2000, agent name to 80, agent role to 120, task title to 200,
and task details to 2000 — the same limits Cloud enforces before it
sends.
- Mount the router in `server/src/app.ts` and register the path in the
OpenAPI document.
- Add `server/src/__tests__/onboarding-seed-route.test.ts` with 13
tests.
- The seeded agent is created on `claude_local`. This mirrors the
teams-catalog default for agents created server-side, where no human
runs an environment test first. `PAPERCLIP_ONBOARDING_SEED_ADAPTER_TYPE`
overrides it.
## Verification
```sh
pnpm typecheck # whole workspace, passes
npx vitest run \
server/src/__tests__/onboarding-seed-route.test.ts \
server/src/__tests__/openapi-routes.test.ts # 15 passed
```
The suite runs against embedded Postgres with migrations applied, so
migration `0216` is exercised by every test.
The route tests cover:
- the happy path — mission, agent and task all applied, read immediately
after the 200
- replay of the same revision — no second agent, no second task, no
second goal, no second project
- a later revision — the goal, agent and task are updated in place
- a multi-line mission splitting into a goal title and description
- a revision-only seed
- the activity log entry written once, and not again on a replay
- a caller without access to the company — 403, and nothing written
- a body with no revision — 400
- each field bound past its limit — 400
- a mission planted on an `x-paperclip-cloud-*` header — ignored, body
wins
- an existing Onboarding project — reused, not duplicated
Not verified here: the full Cloud-to-tenant walk against a live stack.
That needs a deployed Cloud and a provisioned tenant together, which is
separate staging work.
## Risks
Migration `0216` creates one new table. It adds no column to an existing
table, rewrites nothing, and backfills nothing, so it is safe to apply
online. The migration safety check passes.
The endpoint writes to a company. Access is enforced by
`assertCompanyAccess`, the same gate the company logo write uses, and a
test covers the denial.
Behavioral note for stacks that already hold data. If a company already
has a non-built-in `ceo` agent, a first seed updates that agent's name
and title rather than creating a second lead. Likewise a seed adopts an
existing company-level goal rather than adding a parallel one. This is
deliberate: the seed is the customer's own stated answer from signup,
and two competing missions or two leads would be worse than one updated
in place. In the intended case — a stack that Cloud has just activated —
none of these exist yet.
The seeded agent is created on `claude_local` with an empty adapter
config. It is idle and needs the usual credential setup before it runs.
Seeding it does not start it.
## Update — rebased onto master + review hardening
Master moved on after this PR was cut, so it was **rebased onto
`master`** and
the seed migration was **renumbered from `0212` to `0216`** (the merged
#11101
took `0212_onboarding_first_task_unique`); the drizzle journal was
re-stitched
and `check:migrations` passes.
Two things landed on top of the original receiver:
- **Mission-only walk contract (PAP-67 r17.4).** The tenant now owns the
first
agent and the first task via #11101's server-owned onboarding path,
which
stamps `ONBOARDING_FIRST_TASK_ORIGIN_KIND` and races safely on the
partial
unique index `issues_onboarding_first_task_uq`. A comment in the apply
path
documents why this receiver leaves the first task to that path on the
cloud
walk, and a paperclip-cloud `node:test`
(`src/onboarding/walk-seed.test.ts`)
asserts the walk's seed carries no `agent`/`firstTask`. The receiver
retains
the agent/first-task code for its documented body contract, kept inert
on the
cloud path by the mission-only seed.
- **Three Greptile P1 fixes** (`95622fa37`): concurrent application is
now
serialized under a per-company `pg_advisory_xact_lock` (no duplicate
goal/agent/project/task on overlapping pushes); a revised first task
carries
its resolved `assigneeAgentId`/`goalId`; and the
`company.onboarding_seed_applied`
audit write is best-effort so a logging failure can't leave the entry
permanently absent. Two new regression tests cover the first two.
## Model Used
Claude Opus 5 (`claude-opus-5`), 1M context window, extended thinking,
with tool use and code execution. Used for the original codebase
investigation, the implementation, and the tests. The rebase, migration
renumber, mission-only contract, and the three P1 fixes were done with
Claude Opus 4.8 (`claude-opus-4-8`), extended thinking, with tool use
and code execution.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Fixes#7623
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Company invites are part of the access subsystem and must produce
URLs that recipients can open from outside the host machine.
> - Paperclip already has public/auth base URL configuration for
deployments behind a public hostname, Tailscale, or a reverse proxy.
> - Invite URL composition was still deriving its origin from the
incoming request host, so loopback-bound servers emitted
`http://127.0.0.1:3100/invite/...`.
> - A loopback invite URL is not shareable with a remote human or agent,
even when the token itself is valid.
> - This pull request makes invite URL builders prefer the configured
public base URL and keep the existing request-host fallback when it is
unset.
> - The benefit is that copied invite links use the reachable deployment
origin without changing local-only behavior.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Fixes#7623
No duplicate or related PRs/issues were found in a GitHub search for
invite URL, loopback, public base URL, and `authPublicBaseUrl` terms.
## What Changed
- Added base URL resolution in `server/src/routes/access.ts` that strips
trailing slashes and prefers configured `authPublicBaseUrl` over the
request-derived host.
- Threaded `authPublicBaseUrl` through invite summary, invite onboarding
manifest, onboarding text, access routes, `createApp`, and server
startup wiring.
- Added `server/src/__tests__/invite-url-public-base-url.test.ts`
covering configured public-base precedence, unset fallback behavior, and
trailing-slash normalization.
- Registered the invite public-base URL test in the serialized Vitest
server runner.
## Verification
```bash
pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/invite-url-public-base-url.test.ts
pnpm run test:run:serialized
```
Local results from the rebased PR branch:
- `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` exited 0.
- Targeted invite URL test exited 0: 1 file, 3 tests passed.
- Serialized server suite exited 0: 106 serialized suites completed; the
new invite URL test passed inside that runner.
Manual check after deployment: set `PAPERCLIP_AUTH_PUBLIC_BASE_URL` or
equivalent public base URL config, create a company invite, and confirm
the returned/copied invite URL uses that public origin instead of
`127.0.0.1`.
## Risks
Low risk. The new public base URL parameter is optional and falls back
to existing request-derived behavior when unset. The main operational
risk is misconfigured public base URL input; the implementation only
trims trailing slashes and otherwise trusts the configured origin.
## Model Used
- Original implementation: Anthropic `claude-sonnet-4-6`, 200k context,
tool use and test execution.
- Conflict repair and verification: OpenAI Codex GPT-5.5, coding agent
with shell, git, GitHub CLI, and local test execution.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Coder (Claude) <coder-claude@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip Coder (Claude) <lad-agent@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Local adapters (claude_local, codex_local) run agent heartbeats as
child processes, with a short-lived run JWT injected as
`PAPERCLIP_API_KEY` at spawn time
> - That JWT is minted exactly once, when the adapter spawns the process
— its TTL must therefore cover the entire wall-clock life of the run,
not just a prompt startup
> - On laptops the gap between spawn and first real execution can be
huge: a timer heartbeat scheduled while the lid is closed fires during a
~2s macOS dark wake, the machine re-sleeps immediately, and the frozen
child only executes during a later, longer wake — over an hour of
wall-clock delay in observed runs
> - The server's default TTL was 1h, so those sessions started with an
already-expired `PAPERCLIP_API_KEY` and every control-plane call 401'd;
the agent had to recover by manually minting a fresh key
> - The 1h default was also a spec drift: the CLI `env` command
(`DEFAULT_AGENT_JWT_TTL_SECONDS`) and the agent-authentication design
doc both document 172800s (48h)
> - This pull request realigns the server default to 48h and documents
the host-suspension constraint at the mint site and in the regression
test
> - The benefit is that lid-closed/suspended-host heartbeat runs come up
with a valid credential, and the three places that state the default now
agree
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public GitHub issue exists for this; per the bug-report template:
- **What happened:** A timer-driven heartbeat run on a MacBook (lid
closed, on battery) was invoked during a ~2s dark wake. The adapter
spawned the CLI and logged init within 2s, then the host re-slept and
the session sat frozen for ~64 minutes until a longer dark wake let it
execute. By then the injected run JWT (1h TTL, minted at spawn) had
expired, so every API call from the agent returned 401 and the run could
only recover via a manually minted key. A second agent's run the same
night showed the identical signature (output timestamps exactly matching
`pmset -g log` dark-wake windows).
- **Expected behavior:** A run that starts late because the host was
suspended should still have a valid `PAPERCLIP_API_KEY` when it finally
executes.
- **Steps to reproduce:** Run Paperclip on a laptop with a
`claude_local` agent on a timer heartbeat; close the lid on battery
overnight; observe a run invoked during a dark wake whose session
executes >1h later with an expired token (compare run-log timestamps to
`pmset -g log` sleep/wake entries).
- **Version/commit:** current `master` (14f20be9); local trusted
deployment mode.
Related context: #5864 introduced per-company signing keys in this same
module (no TTL changes).
## What Changed
- `server/src/agent-auth-jwt.ts`: default `ttlSeconds` for local agent
run JWTs raised from `60 * 60` (1h) to `60 * 60 * 48` (48h), matching
`DEFAULT_AGENT_JWT_TTL_SECONDS` in `cli/src/commands/env.ts` and
`doc/plans/2026-02-18-agent-authentication-implementation.md`; comment
documents why the TTL must cover host-suspension gaps
- `server/src/agent-auth-jwt.ts`: stale "~1h by default" reference in
the legacy-fallback guidance updated to 48h
- `server/src/__tests__/agent-auth-jwt.test.ts`: default-TTL regression
test updated to assert 48h and explain the constraint
- `PAPERCLIP_AGENT_JWT_TTL_SECONDS` remains the explicit override knob;
operators who set it see no behavior change
## Verification
- `cd server && pnpm vitest run src/__tests__/agent-auth-jwt.test.ts
src/__tests__/agent-auth-middleware.test.ts` — 24/24 pass locally
- Review that the three default sources now agree:
`server/src/agent-auth-jwt.ts` (`60 * 60 * 48`),
`cli/src/commands/env.ts` (`DEFAULT_AGENT_JWT_TTL_SECONDS = "172800"`),
design doc (`default: 172800`)
- Manual: on a laptop, set no TTL env, trigger a heartbeat, `echo
$PAPERCLIP_API_KEY` inside the run and decode the JWT — `exp - iat` is
172800
## Risks
- Longer-lived bearer tokens widen the leak window if a run token is
exfiltrated. Mitigations already in place: tokens are
per-company/per-instance signed (#5864), bound to a `run_id`, and never
persisted server-side. Operators wanting shorter tokens keep the
`PAPERCLIP_AGENT_JWT_TTL_SECONDS` override.
- The legacy master-secret fallback window guidance ("disable ~one TTL
after deploy") lengthens accordingly; the comment now states 48h
explicitly.
- Follow-up ideas intentionally out of scope: rejecting run JWTs whose
run has terminated (server-side revocation check), and holding a power
assertion (`caffeinate`-style) for the duration of local adapter runs so
dark-wake-spawned runs keep the host awake.
## Model Used
- Claude (Anthropic) — Fable 5, model ID `claude-fable-5`, via Claude
Code 2.1.x under Paperclip's `claude_local` adapter; extended thinking
and full tool use (shell, file edits, test execution) enabled
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - Every agent run gets a run-scoped bridge into the Paperclip API
through the injected `PAPERCLIP_API_URL` / `PAPERCLIP_API_KEY` env vars,
built by `buildPaperclipEnv` in
`packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.ts`
> - `buildPaperclipEnv` resolves that URL as `PAPERCLIP_RUNTIME_API_URL
?? PAPERCLIP_API_URL ?? http://<listen-host>:<port>`, and the server
always exports `PAPERCLIP_RUNTIME_API_URL` derived from
`authPublicBaseUrl` at boot
> - When `authPublicBaseUrl` points at an address that is not reachable
from inside the runtime container (e.g. a VPN/tailnet-only address used
to keep the web UI off the public internet), every local run receives a
dead API URL (`curl` exit 7) and agents only survive by hand-rolling a
localhost fallback
> - An operator-set `PAPERCLIP_API_URL` is the documented escape hatch —
`docs/deploy/environment-variables.md` states the server "preserves the
value" when set externally and that the run-level var "inherits the
server-level value" — but the run env builder inverts the precedence, so
the override never actually reaches runs
> - This pull request swaps the precedence in `buildPaperclipEnv` so an
explicit `PAPERCLIP_API_URL` wins over the derived runtime URL, aligning
the behavior with the documented contract
> - The benefit is that operators with split-horizon topologies (public
auth URL != container-reachable URL) can point agent runs at a reachable
endpoint with one env var, with zero behavior change for deployments
that do not set it
## Underlying Issue
No pre-existing public issue covers this, so per CONTRIBUTING ("Link
Issues or Describe Them In-PR") here are the `bug_report.yml` fields
inline:
- **What happened:** with `PAPERCLIP_AUTH_PUBLIC_BASE_URL` on a
tailnet-only address and `PAPERCLIP_API_URL=http://localhost:3100`
explicitly set in the server environment, every agent run still received
`PAPERCLIP_API_URL=http://100.x.y.z:3100` (the derived,
container-unreachable URL); `curl` from inside the run exits 7 and
agents can only reach the API by hand-rolling a localhost fallback
- **Expected behavior:** the run env inherits the operator-configured
`PAPERCLIP_API_URL`, as documented in
`docs/deploy/environment-variables.md` ("preserves the value", run-level
var "inherits the server-level value")
- **Steps to reproduce:** (1) set `PAPERCLIP_AUTH_PUBLIC_BASE_URL` to an
address not reachable from inside the server container, (2) set
`PAPERCLIP_API_URL=http://localhost:3100` in the server env, (3) trigger
any agent run and inspect the spawned process env: it carries the
derived URL, not the override
- **Version/commit:** reproduced on the `91e58acb` image (2026-07-19);
the precedence is unchanged on current `master` (`a3b293e`)
- **Deployment mode:** single-host Docker Compose, local adapters
(`claude_local`/`codex_local`), web UI exposed via VPN/tailnet only
## Related PRs (dedup search)
Several in-flight PRs touch the same pain point (runs receiving an
unreachable injected API URL) — linked for reviewer context; none of
them honors the documented explicit override, and the older ones appear
stale:
- #9916 — reworks `PAPERCLIP_RUNTIME_API_URL` derivation and port
preservation (server side); complementary, does not change run-env
precedence
- #8130 — honors a pre-set `PAPERCLIP_RUNTIME_API_URL` (server side); a
complementary escape hatch via the runtime var instead of the documented
`PAPERCLIP_API_URL` override
- #8025 — heuristic: prefer loopback when the runtime bind is loopback
(no activity since Jun 12)
- #5692 — heuristic loopback-safe URL inside `buildPaperclipEnv` (no
activity since May 14)
- #4877 — broader same-host injection rework across 10 files (no
activity since May 2)
- #4794 — always forces loopback for spawned agents (no activity since
Apr 30; would break split-horizon setups where a reachable non-loopback
URL is intended)
This PR intentionally takes the Path-1 route from CONTRIBUTING: the
smallest possible change (swap two lines so the documented operator
override wins) plus regression tests, rather than a new heuristic.
## What Changed
- `packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.ts`: `buildPaperclipEnv` now
resolves the injected URL as `PAPERCLIP_API_URL ??
PAPERCLIP_RUNTIME_API_URL ?? http://<listen-host>:<port>` (explicit
override first), with a short comment explaining why
- `packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts`: three new tests
covering the override precedence, the derived-URL fallback, and the
listen-host default (including the `0.0.0.0` to `localhost` mapping)
- `server/src/__tests__/paperclip-env.test.ts`: updated the expectation
that encoded the old runtime-URL-first precedence and added the
symmetric fallback case (runtime URL used when no explicit override is
set)
- No docs changes needed: `docs/deploy/environment-variables.md` already
describes the fixed behavior
## Verification
- `vitest run` on the new `buildPaperclipEnv` tests in
`packages/adapter-utils`: 3/3 pass
- `vitest run` on `server/src/__tests__/paperclip-env.test.ts` after the
expectation update: 5/5 pass (the first CI run correctly flagged the one
test that encoded the old precedence)
- Reproduced and verified on a production deployment (single-host
Docker, `PAPERCLIP_AUTH_PUBLIC_BASE_URL` on a tailnet-only address):
- Before: freshly spawned runs received
`PAPERCLIP_API_URL=http://100.x.y.z:3100` (verified in the spawned
process `/proc/<pid>/environ`); `curl` to it from inside the container
exits 7
- After (with `PAPERCLIP_API_URL=http://localhost:3100` in the compose
environment): a fresh run received `http://localhost:3100`, and `curl
$PAPERCLIP_API_URL/api/agents/me` with the run-scoped key returned HTTP
200; the run finished `succeeded` with usage telemetry recorded
## Risks
- Low. Behavior changes only for deployments that explicitly set
`PAPERCLIP_API_URL`; when unset (the default),
`PAPERCLIP_RUNTIME_API_URL` is used exactly as before
- The sandbox callback bridge (`execution-target.ts`) is intentionally
untouched: remote sandboxes genuinely need the publicly reachable URL,
and its `input.hostApiUrl || PAPERCLIP_RUNTIME_API_URL || ...` chain
still provides it
## Model Used
- Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic, model ID `claude-fable-5`), extended
thinking + agentic tool use via Claude Code, operating over SSH against
the affected deployment
## Checklist
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Sergio-LPA <204395363+Sergio-LPA@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Issues coordinate that work, and first-class blockers
(`blockedByIssueIds`) are how dependent work auto-resumes when its
prerequisites finish
> - A human commenting on a blocked issue implicitly reopens it to
`todo` — a deliberate heuristic so "please continue" comments revive
parked work
> - But that heuristic evaluates the issue's *pre-update* blocker set,
ignoring blockers being wired in by the very same PATCH
> - So the natural repair action for a bare-blocked issue — one PATCH
adding `blockedByIssueIds` plus an explanatory comment — silently flips
the issue to `todo`, contradicting the dependency edit it just made
> - This pull request suppresses the implicit reopen when the request
itself declares a non-empty blocker list
> - The benefit is that structured dependency edits always win over the
conversational-comment heuristic, so blocked issues keep their intended
waiting posture and auto-resume via `issue_blockers_resolved` as
designed
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No existing issue describes this exact behavior; per the bug-report
template:
- **What happened:** On a `blocked` issue with an empty blocker set, a
board user sent one `PATCH /api/issues/:id` containing
`blockedByIssueIds: ["<unresolved-issue-id>"]` and a `comment`. The
response showed `status: "todo"` — the implicit comment-reopen fired
even though the same request wired an unresolved blocker. A follow-up
`PATCH { status: "blocked" }` was then needed to restore the waiting
posture (and because the blocker array replaces on every update, the two
fields had to be re-sent together).
- **Expected behavior:** A request that explicitly declares dependencies
is stating that the issue is waiting on other work. The implicit reopen
exists for plain conversational comments; it should not override a
structured dependency edit made in the same request.
- **Steps to reproduce:** (1) Create issue A with `status: "blocked"`
and no blockers; (2) as a board user, `PATCH /api/issues/A` with `{
"blockedByIssueIds": ["<id of an open issue>"], "comment": "wiring the
dependency" }`; (3) observe the response/issue status is `todo` instead
of remaining `blocked`.
- **Version/commit:** reproduced on `master` @ `d1b9448b5`.
- **Deployment mode:** `authenticated`, single-host (macOS launchd),
embedded Postgres.
Related (not fixed here): the family of "blocked with empty
`blockedByIssueIds` zombie" reports — Refs #9201, Refs #6523 — this bug
is one way an issue's status and blocker list end up contradicting each
other; and Refs #8062, which proposes a different auto-transition at the
status/blocker boundary.
## What Changed
- `shouldImplicitlyMoveCommentedIssueToTodo`
(server/src/routes/issues.ts) accepts an optional
`requestAddsExplicitBlockers` input and returns `false` when set,
alongside the existing suppression guards, with a comment documenting
the rationale.
- The `PATCH /api/issues/:id` call site passes
`requestAddsExplicitBlockers: Array.isArray(req.body.blockedByIssueIds)
&& req.body.blockedByIssueIds.length > 0`.
- Two route tests in `issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts`: a regression
test (comment + non-empty blocker list on a blocked issue must not flip
status) and a boundary test (comment + `blockedByIssueIds: []` still
implicitly reopens, preserving the existing clear-blockers behavior).
Deliberately unchanged: explicit `reopen`/`resume` flags still behave as
before, and the `POST /comments` route is untouched (its body cannot
carry `blockedByIssueIds`).
## Verification
- `cd server && pnpm vitest run
src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts` → 74/74 pass.
- Reverting the `issues.ts` change makes the new regression test fail
with `expected 'todo' to be undefined` — it bites.
- `cd server && pnpm tsc --noEmit` → clean.
## Risks
- Low. The change is a single additional suppression guard on the
*implicit* reopen path, scoped to requests that carry a non-empty
`blockedByIssueIds` array; all other reopen behavior is untouched.
- Edge case considered: a request wiring only already-resolved blockers
plus a comment now stays `blocked` instead of implicitly reopening. This
is the conservative reading of caller intent (an explicit dependency
edit), and an explicit `status`/`reopen` in the same request still wins.
## Model Used
- Anthropic Claude — Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`), extended thinking
enabled, agentic tool use via Claude Code (CLI). Production repro,
diagnosis, fix, and tests all model-authored under human direction.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (none
applicable — behavior comment added inline)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (pending first CI run on this PR)
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
(pending first review pass)
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Agent runs execute in sandbox environments acquired through provider
plugins (e.g. the Kubernetes sandbox provider)
> - Lease acquisition happens during run setup, before the adapter
executes
> - When a provider plugin's worker is momentarily unavailable (a server
or plugin restart window), lease acquisition throws "Sandbox provider
... is installed via plugin ..., but its worker is not running."
> - The heartbeat setup path records that as a terminal `setup_failed`:
no retry classifier matches the message, so the run dies instantly even
though the worker returns seconds later
> - This PR classifies that transient condition as retryable
infrastructure so the run is retried instead of being lost to a restart
blip
> - The benefit is that routine restarts no longer produce spurious
instant run failures
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public GitHub issue exists; describing inline following the bug
report template.
**What happened**
During a brief sandbox-provider-worker restart window, several runs
failed instantly with `setup_failed` ("... but its worker is not
running."), while runs on the same agent moments earlier and later
succeeded.
**Expected behavior**
A transient, self-healing worker-unavailable condition should schedule a
bounded retry, not terminally fail the run.
**Steps to reproduce**
Trigger a run while the sandbox provider plugin worker is momentarily
unavailable (a server or plugin restart). Lease acquisition throws the
worker-not-running error and the run is finalized as `setup_failed` with
no retry. The recovery test added here reproduces the classification
path.
**Deployment mode**
Cloud multi-tenant execution (Kubernetes sandbox provider plugin).
## What Changed
- Added a dedicated, readable predicate that recognizes the transient
sandbox-provider-worker-unavailable lease failure and treats it as
retryable infrastructure, so the heartbeat schedules a bounded
continuation retry instead of finalizing terminally
- The predicate is anchored to the full lease-failure phrasing (`is
installed via plugin ... but its worker is not running`) so it cannot
match the permanent "provider not installed" message emitted by config
validation
- Added tests proving the readiness poll already waits the full deadline
while the worker handle is absent or `starting` (registered-late
coverage); no poll behavior change was needed
## Verification
- `cd server && npx vitest run
src/__tests__/environment-runtime.test.ts` — poll exhaustion +
registered-late cases
- `npx vitest run src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts` —
worker-unavailable message schedules a retry; a non-matching permanent
provider failure still escalates terminally (negative case)
## Risks
Low risk. The retry is bounded by the existing
infrastructure-continuation attempt cap (max 3), the message match is
narrow enough to exclude the permanent provider-not-installed failure
(covered by a negative test), and no readiness-poll or lease-acquisition
behavior changed.
## Model Used
Claude (Anthropic) via Claude Code. Implementation and tests authored by
a Claude Sonnet-class model (`claude-sonnet-5`) dispatched as isolated
per-task implementer agents under a multi-agent orchestration workflow;
root-cause investigation, planning, and two-stage adversarial code
review performed by additional Claude agents. Extended thinking and tool
use enabled throughout.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Hiring an agent means choosing a harness (adapter) for it, and an
instance can declare which harnesses it actually runs through
`PAPERCLIP_ADAPTERS`, which `reconcileAdapterAvailability` turns into a
disabled set at boot
> - The hire and create routes validate the adapter type with
`assertKnownAdapterType`, which only asks whether the adapter is
REGISTERED — a disabled adapter passes
> - So an agent can be created on a harness the instance cannot run, and
the failure only appears later, per run, at lease time: `Adapter "..."
is not in the configured adapter registry`
> - By then the error is in a run log, minutes after the choice, with
nothing tying it back to the harness the user picked; the agent also
keeps accepting work it can never do
> - This pull request validates the hire and create paths against the
ENABLED set and refuses with a message that names the adapters that are
available
> - The benefit is that an impossible choice fails at the moment it is
made, in the words of the choice itself, instead of as a run failure the
user cannot act on
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No existing issue; describing it here per the bug report template.
**What happened**
On an instance with a curated registry, a company's Chief of Staff was
hired on `cursor_cloud`, which that instance had disabled. The API
accepted the hire. Its first assignment run then failed:
```
Failed to acquire lease for environment "Kubernetes Sandbox" (sandbox): Adapter "cursor_cloud" is not in the configured adapter registry
```
and its automation run sat in `queued` for hours afterwards. Nothing in
the hire response, the agent detail view, or the agent's status
explained that this harness could never run.
**Expected behavior**
hiring on an adapter the instance has disabled is refused at hire time,
with a message naming the adapters that can be chosen.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Start the server with a registry that omits an otherwise-registered
adapter, e.g. `PAPERCLIP_ADAPTERS` listing `claude_local` but not
`cursor_cloud`.
2. `POST /api/companies/:companyId/agents` with
`{"name":"CoS","adapterType":"cursor_cloud"}`.
3. The agent is created (201). Every run it attempts fails at lease time
with the message above.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master (`4c55f0d8d`).
## What Changed
- `server/src/routes/agents.ts`: adds `assertSelectableAdapterType`,
which extends `assertKnownAdapterType` with an enabled-set check and
throws `422 Adapter "<type>" is not available on this instance.
Available adapters: <list>`. The hire (`POST .../agent-hires`) and
create (`POST .../agents`) paths now use it.
- Routes that operate on an EXISTING agent keep
`assertKnownAdapterType`, so an agent already running on a
since-disabled adapter is unaffected — the same rule
`listEnabledServerAdapters` already documents ("hidden from selection,
still functional for agents that already use them").
- `server/src/__tests__/agent-adapter-validation-routes.test.ts`: mocks
the adapter-plugin store's disabled set (so the test never writes to a
real `~/.paperclip/adapter-settings.json`), and covers
refuse-when-disabled (including that the message names the alternatives
and that no agent is created) plus create-still-works-when-enabled.
## Verification
```
pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/agent-adapter-validation-routes.test.ts
```
13 tests pass, including the two new cases and the existing
unknown-adapter-type test.
Manual: disable an adapter (`PATCH /api/adapters/:type {"disabled":
true}` as an instance admin, or omit it from `PAPERCLIP_ADAPTERS` and
restart), then POST an agent with that `adapterType` — 422 naming the
available adapters, and no agent row is created.
## Risks
Low, and scoped to new selections:
- Automation that creates agents on a disabled adapter now gets a 422
where it previously got a 201 followed by runs that always failed. That
is the intended behavior change, and the message names the valid
choices.
- Existing agents, and every route that acts on an existing agent, are
untouched.
- The enabled set comes from the same store `GET /api/adapters` already
reports, so the API and the picker cannot disagree.
## Model Used
Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic), model id `claude-opus-5`, 1M context window,
extended thinking, with tool use and code execution via Claude Code.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change
(`upstream/adapter-selection-guard`) and contains no internal ticket id
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (the
new helper documents the selection-vs-existing-agent rule)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Related: #10254 makes the adapter inventory readable during onboarding,
which is what lets the picker hide these adapters in the first place.
This PR is the server-side backstop for the same failure.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Agents run on a heartbeat; when an issue-scoped run ends, the server
records the outcome on the issue's board thread.
> - Normally the agent posts its own summary comment via `POST
/comments`. When it doesn't, the server has a fallback that
auto-publishes a run summary so the board isn't left silent.
> - That fallback (`buildHeartbeatRunIssueComment` in
`server/src/services/heartbeat-run-summary.ts`) returns
`resultJson.summary` **verbatim**, with no length cap or shape check.
> - For runs that never produce a final `result`, `summary` is
concatenated **inter-tool narration** ("Let me check…", "I'll fetch…",
joined by the claude-local adapter's parser). The fallback then dumps
that raw transcript onto the public board thread.
> - In practice this produces long, confusing transcript comments that
mislead reviewers and other agents about what actually happened.
> - This PR gates the fallback so it publishes a clean summary or a
short stub, never raw transcript.
> - The benefit is that the board thread stays trustworthy: a missing
agent summary degrades to a one-line "no summary this run" note instead
of leaking internal narration.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public GitHub issue exists for this; describing it here as a bug
report.
**What happened:** When an issue-scoped heartbeat run finishes without
the agent posting its own comment, the server's fallback publishes
`resultJson.summary` verbatim as the board comment. When the run
produced no final result, that value is concatenated inter-tool
narration, so raw transcript is posted to the issue thread.
**Expected behavior:** The fallback should post a concise summary when
one is available, and otherwise a short stub — never multi-hundred-line
raw narration.
**Steps to reproduce:**
1. Run an issue-scoped agent turn that ends without calling `POST
/comments` and without emitting a final `result` (only inter-tool
narration).
2. Observe the auto-published board comment: it is the full narration
transcript.
**Deployment mode:** self-hosted server
(`server/src/services/heartbeat.ts` fallback path).
**Prior attempt:** an earlier PR for this change was auto-closed when
its head branch was renamed to strip an internal ticket id from the
branch name; this PR supersedes it.
**Related PR:** #7505 (`fix(heartbeat): skip auto-mirror run-summary
comment on cross-owner wakes`) touches the same fallback area but
addresses a different case (cross-owner wakes); this PR is
complementary, gating the *content* of the fallback rather than *when*
it fires.
## What Changed
- `server/src/services/heartbeat-run-summary.ts`:
`buildHeartbeatRunIssueComment` now gates the fallback text. After
resolving `summary` → `result` → `message`, if the text opens with a
narration phrase (`let me`, `i'll`, `i need to`, `i can see`, `looking
at`, `fetching`, `checking`, `first,`) **or** exceeds
`MAX_FALLBACK_COMMENT_CHARS` (1200), it returns a fixed stub: *"Run
completed. Agent did not post a summary comment this run (transcript
withheld — see run log)."* Otherwise it returns the text unchanged.
- `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-run-summary.test.ts`: added cases for
each narration opener, the length cap, the exact 1200-char boundary
(posts), and clean-summary passthrough.
Runs where the agent posts via the API are unaffected — the fallback
only fires when no agent comment is found for the run, and that call
site is unchanged.
## Verification
- `pnpm --filter @paperclip/server test heartbeat-run-summary` — 13/13
pass (new + existing cases).
- Manual reasoning: the gate is a pure function of the resolved text;
API-posted runs never reach it.
- **CI note:** at the time of opening, `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile`
fails on this branch's base commit with
`ERR_PNPM_LOCKFILE_CONFIG_MISMATCH` (patchedDependencies drift). This
reproduces on every PR based on the current `master` tip (e.g. #10137)
and is unrelated to this two-file change; PRs cut from the prior master
(e.g. #10135) install cleanly. This should clear once the `Refresh
Lockfile` job lands a corrected lockfile on `master` and this branch is
rebased. Happy to rebase or fold in the lockfile fix if a maintainer
prefers.
## Risks
Low risk. The change is confined to one pure function and its tests,
touches no schema or migration, and only alters the *fallback* comment
path (never the normal API-posted path). Worst case is a legitimate
clean summary that happens to open with a gated phrase gets replaced by
the stub — the run log still holds the full detail.
## Model Used
Claude Opus 4.8 (`claude-opus-4-8`), 1M-token context window, extended
thinking, with tool use.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change
(`fix/gate-heartbeat-fallback-comment`) and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (no
user-facing docs affected)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (blocked on a master-side
lockfile drift, see CI note)
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
(pending re-review on this PR)
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Thinking Path
- Followed a silent nonzero Hermes exit from child-process result
parsing through heartbeat run, runtime, task-session, and agent
finalization.
- Found two gaps: the adapter could return `errorMessage: null` for a
numeric nonzero exit, and heartbeat later reused the nullable adapter
field instead of its normalized fallback.
- Kept timeout, signal-cancellation, and specific parsed diagnostics
authoritative.
## Linked Issue(s) / Bug Report
Related to #9751 (stderr classification) and #9519 (exit-zero
finalization), but this is a separate failure mode.
Reproduction: run Hermes with a child result equivalent to `exitCode:
1`, `timedOut: false`, and no parsed diagnostic. The heartbeat row
derives `Adapter failed`, while runtime/task-session/agent finalization
can persist null diagnostics.
## What Changed
- Give silent numeric nonzero Hermes exits a stable fallback such as
`Hermes exited with code 1`.
- Preserve specific parsed errors and timeout/signal semantics.
- Reuse the normalized persisted run error for recovered runtime state,
task-session `lastError`, and agent `errorReason`.
- Add adapter-level and embedded-Postgres regressions.
## Verification
- Hermes adapter `execute.onspawn.test.ts` — 7 passed.
- Focused heartbeat normalized-error regression — 1 passed (91 skipped).
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/hermes-paperclip-adapter typecheck` —
passed.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed.
- `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` — passed.
Independent review also ran the full recovery file: the changed
regression passed; one unrelated pre-existing timing-sensitive test
timed out.
## Risks / Rollout Notes
Low risk. Fallback text is used only when a numeric nonzero exit has no
better diagnostic. Existing timeout, signal, and parsed-error precedence
remains unchanged.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex `gpt-5.6-sol` with repository inspection, test execution,
and independent read-only review.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (not
applicable: internal diagnostics only)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Co-authored-by: cucurigoo <cucurigoo@users.noreply.github.com>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip's company-scoped HTTP routes must reject inaccessible
resources before returning resource-specific authorization results.
> - The shared `getAccessibleResource` helper established that
invariant, but direct tool-access routes still fetched globally unique
IDs first and then returned 403 from later authorization checks.
> - A signed-in user could therefore distinguish a valid foreign-company
resource ID from an unknown ID.
> - This change applies the existing tenant-aware lookup gate
consistently across direct tool-resource routes and rejects inaccessible
OAuth state before callback-specific authorization.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
- No standalone issue exists. This is a security-hardening follow-up to
#3967.
- **Observed:** a member of company A can submit a known application,
connection, profile, profile-entry, or OAuth-state ID belonging to
company B and receive a different response than for a random missing ID.
- **Expected:** missing and inaccessible foreign resources are
indistinguishable at the HTTP boundary. Signed-in instance
administrators still require company membership for company-scoped
access.
- **Reproduction:** create resources in company B, authenticate as an
owner of company A without B membership, and call the direct
`/api/tool-*` routes using B's IDs. Before this change, affected calls
returned 403 while unknown IDs returned 404.
## What Changed
- Wrapped direct application, connection, profile, and profile-entry
lookups in `server/src/routes/tool-access.ts` with the shared
`getAccessibleResource` 404 gate.
- Added tenant membership validation to OAuth callback-state lookup
before session/role checks, returning the same invalid-state response as
an unknown state.
- Expanded route regressions across connection/profile endpoint
families, including grants, usage, installs, gateway-backed test calls,
OAuth, mutations, catalog/activity reads, profile entries, and
instance-admin-without-membership access.
- Updated application update/delete expectations from cross-tenant 403
to non-enumerating 404 responses.
## Verification
After rebasing onto current `master`:
- `pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts` from
`server/` — 113 passed.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — previously passed on
the same implementation; affected upstream paths were unchanged before
this mechanical rebase.
## Risks
- Low implementation risk: no schema, migration, or successful
same-company response changes.
- Intentional behavior change: inaccessible foreign tool-resource IDs
now return 404 instead of 403; inaccessible OAuth states return the same
400 body as missing/expired states.
- The gate reuses `getAccessibleResource` / `hasCompanyAccess` semantics
established by #3967.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol`; repository,
shell, test, TypeScript language-server, and GitHub CLI tool access
enabled.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either linked an existing issue or described the issue
in-PR
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket ID
- [x] I have run focused tests locally on the final rebased head and
they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] Documentation update — N/A: internal authorization correction only
- [x] I have considered and documented risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green on the new rebased head
- [x] Greptile's prior review was 5/5 with no open findings
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Co-authored-by: Daniel Sauer <sauerdaniel@users.noreply.github.com>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Routines allow external systems to start recurring work through
authenticated public webhooks
> - Timestamped HMAC authentication currently verifies authenticity and
age but does not remember an accepted delivery
> - An exact signed request can therefore be reused within its replay
window, including through simultaneous duplicate delivery
> - Replay rejection must be atomic with run creation so concurrent
copies cannot both succeed
> - This pull request derives a non-secret replay identity from each
valid timestamped HMAC delivery and claims it under the existing routine
transaction lock
> - The benefit is at-most-once acceptance of an exact HMAC delivery
without changing ordinary caller-supplied idempotency semantics
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Fixes: #9993
## What Changed
- Derive a stable, non-secret idempotency key after a timestamped HMAC
signature has been validated.
- Reject a previously claimed HMAC delivery with a conflict while
preserving coalescing for existing non-HMAC idempotency keys.
- Apply the same atomic replay claim when automatic worktree execution
is suppressed.
- Add regression coverage for sequential, concurrent, and suppressed-run
replays.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts` —
59 tests passed.
- `pnpm typecheck` — all workspace packages passed.
- The sequential test was observed failing on unmodified `master`: the
second identical request resolved and a second run was created.
- The concurrent regression test verifies exactly one request succeeds
and only one routine run exists.
## Risks
- Low migration risk: no schema change is required; the existing
nullable routine-run idempotency field is reused.
- The routine row lock serializes replay claims, adding a small amount
of contention only while a routine run is being created.
- Replay rejection applies only to `hmac_sha256`, which carries the
timestamp needed for a bounded replay policy. Existing `github_hmac`,
bearer, and unauthenticated trigger semantics are unchanged.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex (GPT-5 family) with reasoning, repository inspection, shell
execution, and test tooling.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] Documentation does not require an update because this restores the
documented replay-window security behavior without changing
configuration or APIs
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The board REST API is how operators and integrations read company
state; `GET /api/companies/:companyId` is one of its most basic reads
> - The route passes the raw path param into `companyService.getById`,
which queries the uuid-typed `companies.id` column directly
> - Any non-UUID ref — a slug, a typo, a stale bookmark — makes Postgres
throw `invalid input syntax for type uuid`, which surfaces as an HTTP
500 with a stack trace in the server log instead of a clean client error
> - A 500 for malformed client input is miscategorized: it pages
operators, pollutes error budgets, and hides the actual problem ("that
ref doesn't exist") from the caller
> - This pull request guards `getById` with a UUID check so non-UUID
refs resolve to `null` and the route returns its existing 404 path
> - The benefit is correct HTTP semantics for bad input, quieter logs,
and one less misleading 500 for self-hosters to chase
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Fixes#9962 — `GET /api/companies/:companyId` returns 500 (`invalid
input syntax for type uuid`) for non-UUID refs instead of 404. Full
repro and log excerpt in the issue.
## What Changed
- `server/src/services/companies.ts`: `getById` returns `null` early for
non-UUID refs instead of passing them to the uuid-typed query.
- `server/src/__tests__/companies-service.test.ts`: regression test —
non-UUID refs (`"tumbly-haus-creative"`, `"not-a-uuid"`, `""`) resolve
to `null` without a query error.
## Verification
- `npx vitest run src/__tests__/companies-service.test.ts` — 12/12 pass
(new test included, embedded-postgres suite).
- Manual: `curl -i /api/companies/not-a-uuid` → 404 (was 500); `curl -i
/api/companies/<real-uuid>` → 200 unchanged.
## Risks
- Low. Pure input-validation guard on one read path; UUID lookups are
byte-for-byte unchanged. Only behavioral shift is 500→404 for refs that
could never have matched a row.
## Model Used
Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`, Anthropic) via Claude Code — diagnosis
from server logs, patch, and test authored with extended thinking and
tool use; human-reviewed and submitted by @christianlappin.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
ticket id
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (n/a —
no doc references this error path)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (pending first CI run)
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
(pending)
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The issues-list REST endpoint (`GET
/api/companies/:companyId/issues`) backs the digester and other pollers
that ask "what changed since last time".
> - The service layer supports rich filters, but there was no
`updatedSince` filter — so every routine fire re-read the full backlog
instead of just the delta.
> - A prior commit added this filter, but it was never merged to
`master`; it only ran in production because a feature branch happened to
be the live checkout, and the behavior vanished when that directory was
repurposed.
> - This pull request re-lands just the `updatedSince` filter (route
param parse + validation, service `IssueFilters` field, and the
`updatedAt` predicate) as a single-purpose change.
> - The benefit is that pollers can request only issues updated after a
timestamp, and the fix now lives durably on `master` instead of a
transient checkout.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public GitHub issue exists; describing inline per the bug report
template.
**What happened**
`GET /api/companies/:companyId/issues` ignores an `updatedSince` query
parameter, so consumers (e.g. the digester and other pollers) cannot
request only the delta since a prior poll and must re-read the whole
backlog on every fire.
**Expected behavior**
Passing `updatedSince=<ISO 8601 timestamp>` returns only issues whose
`updatedAt` is strictly after that timestamp; a malformed value returns
`400`.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Call `GET /api/companies/:companyId/issues?updatedSince=<a future ISO
8601 timestamp>`.
2. Observe the endpoint returns the full backlog instead of an empty
list (the parameter is silently ignored).
## What Changed
- `server/src/routes/issues.ts`: parse the `updatedSince` query param,
return `400` for a non-parseable timestamp, and pass it into
`svc.list()`.
- `server/src/services/issues.ts`: add `updatedSince?: string` to
`IssueFilters` and, when present and valid, add a `gt(issues.updatedAt,
since)` condition to the list query.
- `server/src/__tests__/issue-list-updatedsince-filter-routes.test.ts`:
new route+service coverage — future timestamp returns 0 issues, a past
timestamp returns only the delta, and a malformed timestamp returns 400.
## Verification
- `pnpm vitest run
src/__tests__/issue-list-updatedsince-filter-routes.test.ts` — 3/3 pass.
- `pnpm vitest run
src/__tests__/issue-list-assignee-filter-routes.test.ts` — 5/5 pass
(regression check on the sibling filter path).
- `tsc --noEmit` on `server/` — no new errors introduced (pre-existing
unrelated `plugin-sdk` build errors on `master` are untouched).
## Risks
Low risk. Purely additive: the new filter only takes effect when
`updatedSince` is supplied, so existing callers that omit it are
unaffected. Invalid timestamps fail fast with `400` rather than silently
returning all rows.
## Model Used
Claude — `claude-sonnet-4-6` (implementation) with `claude-opus-4-8`
review/merge-gate; tool use + code execution enabled.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots (N/A — no UI change)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (in progress)
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
(in progress)
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Coder (Claude) <coder-claude@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open-source control plane people use to manage AI
agents for work.
> - Routines are the subsystem that schedules recurring work and returns
routine detail to authorized company actors.
> - Routine detail embedded the complete assignee database row even
though its shared contract requires only assignee identity.
> - That full row can contain protected adapter and runtime
configuration, including environment bindings.
> - The service boundary should project only the fields the routine
contract actually needs.
> - This pull request replaces the full-row query with a company-scoped
identity projection and adds sentinel-based regression coverage.
> - The benefit is useful routine detail without exposing protected
assignee configuration.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public issue exactly tracks this service-level exposure.
- Related prior PR: Refs #4967, an older route-level redaction approach
with broader changes and no focused routine serialization test.
- Related closed PR: Refs #5144, an unmerged prior implementation of the
same identity-projection approach.
- Related agent-route hardening: Refs #8779; that work covers direct
agent responses, while this PR removes protected fields from the routine
embed itself.
Bug details:
- Actual behavior: `GET /api/routines/{routineId}` could serialize the
complete assignee row, including protected adapter/runtime
configuration.
- Expected behavior: routine detail exposes only the assignee identity
required by `RoutineDetail`, including its derived `urlKey`.
- Reproduction: assign an agent with sentinel-only protected
configuration to a routine, retrieve routine detail, and inspect key
presence or serialize the response; no production value is needed or
recorded.
- Version/commit reproduced: upstream `master` immediately before this
PR.
- Deployment mode: service-level embedded Postgres test; the vulnerable
serializer is shared by supported deployments.
## What Changed
- Added a company-scoped assignee summary query in
`server/src/services/routines.ts` that selects only `id`, `name`,
`role`, and `title`, then derives the non-sensitive `urlKey` from the
name.
- Updated `getDetail()` to use that projection instead of selecting the
complete agent row.
- Added focused negative and positive identity assertions, including the
derived `urlKey`, in `server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts`.
- Audited routine list/detail serialization and broader embedded-agent
query sites; routine list exposes only `assigneeAgentId`, while other
agent embeds use explicit projections or authorized agent endpoints.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts` —
57/57 passed.
- Focused sentinel regression test — passed.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` — passed.
- Server, UI, and CLI builds — passed; UI gzip-size completion used a
4096 MB Node heap.
- `git diff --check` — passed.
- Full `pnpm test:run` — 2,699 passed, 1 skipped, 9 failed in untouched
tests. The failures reproduce outside this change and are limited to
local-adapter `nohup`/PTY behavior, macOS `/tmp` versus `/private/tmp`
normalization, and one workspace-runtime auto-port fixture.
## Risks
- Low compatibility risk: the returned shape now matches the existing
shared `RoutineDetail` contract.
- A consumer relying on undocumented protected agent fields inside
routine detail will stop receiving them.
- No schema, migration, deployment, credential, or production-secret
changes are included.
- Rollback is a single commit revert, but reverting would restore the
exposure.
> This is security hardening for the already-shipped routines subsystem;
`ROADMAP.md` marks Scheduled Routines complete, and this PR does not add
or duplicate roadmap feature work.
## Model Used
- OpenAI GPT-5 via Codex, with repository search, local code execution,
tests, TypeScript typechecking, builds, Git, and GitHub API use. The
runtime does not expose a more granular snapshot ID or context-window
size.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and relevant tests pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (no
documentation change is required for this contract-preserving security
fix)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups/- [x] Greptile is 5/5
with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups/5 with no open P2s,
recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: ClawdeBot <clawdebot@Mac-mini-de-ClawdeBot.local>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip validates API request bodies with Zod and converts
validation failures into client errors.
> - The global error handler recognized Zod failures with `instanceof
ZodError`.
> - Monorepo dependency layouts can provide more than one installed Zod
module instance.
> - A valid Zod error from another instance fails that identity check
and falls through as HTTP 500.
> - This pull request keeps the native path and adds a narrow structural
fallback for named Zod errors with an issues array.
> - The benefit is stable HTTP 400 validation semantics regardless of
package-instance identity.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Related but not duplicate: Refs #6908. That PR catches `instanceof
ZodError` inside validation middleware and returns 422; it does not
cover errors created by a second Zod module instance, which is the
reproduced failure here.
**What happened?**
An invalid `POST /api/issues/:id/work-products` payload raised a real
Zod validation error but returned HTTP 500 because the error came from a
different Zod package instance.
**Expected behavior**
All genuine Zod validation failures return HTTP 400 with validation
details, independent of module identity.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Submit a work-product body missing the required `provider`,
`externalId`, and `url` fields.
2. Ensure the route schema is resolved from a different installed Zod
instance than the server error handler.
3. Observe HTTP 500 before this fix.
4. Observe HTTP 400 after this fix.
**Environment**
- Paperclip base: `14f20be92b86a49ff2c35495e5b0fa4d719998ef`
- Deployment: self-hosted, built from source
- Access context: board API
- Adapter scope: not adapter-specific
- [x] I searched open PRs for `ZodError`, validation errors, and
work-product validation and linked related work above.
## What Changed
- Add a narrow `readZodIssues` helper that accepts native Zod errors or
structurally valid cross-package Zod errors.
- Preserve existing HTTP 400 response shape and structured error
context.
- Add a regression for a Zod error object from another module instance.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/error-handler.test.ts`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`
- Full upstream CI test/build/e2e matrix passed.
- Local post-deploy smoke returned HTTP 400 for the previously failing
invalid work-product payload.
## Risks
- A deliberately thrown object named `ZodError` with an `issues` array
will be treated as a client validation failure. The effect is limited to
returning HTTP 400 instead of 500; no authorization or persistence
behavior changes.
- No schema or migration changes.
> This is a bug fix, not roadmap feature work.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex `gpt-5.6-sol`, with tool use, code execution, repository
inspection, and independent read-only review agents.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either linked related public work and described the bug
in-PR following the bug template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
ticket id
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have considered documentation; no user-facing documentation
change is required
- [x] I have considered and documented risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: cucurigoo <cucurigoo@users.noreply.github.com>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Claude agents that run in a remote sandbox need a safe in-product
login path
> - The existing host login route cannot open a pseudo-terminal inside
that sandbox
> - The login flow must protect the browser code, the login URL, and the
OAuth token at every step
> - This pull request adds the parser, the runner, a Daytona
pseudo-terminal transport, and a guarded, owner-bound session route
behind an injectable transport
> - The route stays inert in the default build and fails closed until a
sandbox provider binds the live transport
> - The benefit is a company-scoped setup-token flow with one-time
secret delivery, redaction, and fail-closed transport checks, ready for
a later staged production rollout
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**Agent or provider**
Claude Code setup-token login for sandbox agents.
**Why this adapter is useful**
Sandbox agents need a supported way to sign in without host credentials.
An authorized owner completes the browser step and receives the token
one time.
**How the agent is invoked**
When a sandbox provider binds the injectable transport, the server
starts `claude setup-token` through a sandbox pseudo-terminal, sends the
browser code to the matched prompt, and returns the token through the
guarded session route. The default build does not bind the transport. In
that state the start route fails closed with a fixed no-secret `503`. It
does not start a process and it does not hold a sandbox lease.
**Additional context**
The transport is injectable, so each sandbox provider binds its own
pseudo-terminal. This pull request adds the Daytona transport but does
not bind it in the production server. A production wiring needs a lease
manager, a live pseudo-terminal factory, a durable token store, and its
own security review. The route keeps secrets out of logs, activity
details, errors, telemetry, and non-owner responses.
## What Changed
- Add strict parsers for the setup-token URL, the prompt, and the
success token.
- Add a login runner that drives the `claude setup-token` command
through a pseudo-terminal.
- Add the Daytona pseudo-terminal transport and the sandbox plugin
wiring.
- Add a company-scoped, owner-bound login session service with rate
limits, a reaper, cleanup, and one-time token delivery.
- Add the guarded session routes at
`/agents/:id/setup-token-login-sessions/*` behind an injectable
transport. The routes become the live login path only when a provider
binds the transport.
- Keep the start route fail-closed in the default build. It returns a
fixed no-secret `503` and it does not bind `setupTokenLogin`.
- Keep the existing host route `POST /agents/:id/claude-login` in place.
This pull request does not replace it.
- Keep confidential responses behind a fail-closed TLS transport guard
with `Cache-Control: no-store`, and extend redaction for the new fields.
- Export the parser and the runner from the Claude local server entry,
and document the new session routes in the OpenAPI spec.
## Verification
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run setup-token-route
setup-token-session`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-claude-local exec vitest run`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server run typecheck`
- Confirm that the pull request checks pass on GitHub.
## Risks
- Low user-facing risk on merge. The default build does not bind the
transport, so the production start route stays fail-closed with a `503`.
The merge does not change the production login behavior.
- When a provider later binds the transport, the flow starts a live
sandbox process and holds a short-lived in-memory secret. Cleanup must
stop the child before it releases the sandbox lease.
- The transport guard fails closed when the deployment does not provide
a trusted TLS path. A wrong proxy allowlist can block a valid request.
- The production wiring is out of scope. It needs a lease manager, a
live pseudo-terminal factory, a durable token store, and its own
security review before the server binds `setupTokenLogin`.
## Model Used
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 assisted the implementation. It used extended
reasoning, code execution, repository tool use, and a 200,000-token
context window.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` /
`Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the
relevant issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (the
OpenAPI spec covers the new session routes; no user-facing documentation
needs changes)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Environments give agent runs an execution target, and their env vars
can carry secrets, so writes need a company scope for secret bindings
> - `PATCH /environments/:id` resolves that scope from a query param,
existing bindings, or a single-membership actor — and fails closed
otherwise
> - A fresh environment has no bindings yet, so an admin whose
memberships cannot pin one company gets a 422 on the very first env var
save and can never create the first binding
> - #11200 made this reachable from the UI: it opened the envVars-only
edit on the managed sandbox row, but the UI never sends the company it
already knows
> - This pull request sends the page's selected company on environment
updates and adds a server fallback to the instance's only company
> - The benefit is that the first env var save works on fresh
environments, while multi-company ambiguity still fails closed
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #11200
**What happened?**
On a fresh platform-managed sandbox environment, the first "Save
environment variables" in the UI fails with HTTP 422: "Environment
secret management requires a companyId context during the
instance-scoped transition." The same failure hits any environment
update that touches `envVars` or `config` when the environment has no
secret bindings yet and the actor's memberships do not name exactly one
company (for example an instance admin provisioned without a membership
row, or a user in two companies).
**Expected behavior**
The save succeeds. The client tells the server which company scopes the
secret bindings, and on a single-company instance the server can resolve
the only possible scope by itself.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Provision a platform-managed sandbox environment (managed-config
`environments` entry) so the row exists with no secret bindings.
2. Sign in as an instance admin whose memberships do not resolve to
exactly one company.
3. Open Environments, edit the managed row, add an env var, and save.
4. The PATCH returns 422 with the companyId-context error.
## What Changed
- `ui/src/api/environments.ts`: `environmentsApi.update` accepts an
optional `companyId` and sends it as the `companyId` query param the
server already reads. Renamed the `customImageCompanyQuery` helper to
`companyIdQuery` since it now serves plain updates and probes too.
- `ui/src/pages/CompanyEnvironments.tsx`: both the managed envVars-only
save and the general environment save pass `selectedCompanyId`.
- `server/src/routes/environments.ts`:
`resolveEnvironmentSecretContextCompanyId` falls back to the instance's
only company when exactly one exists, mirroring the existing fallback in
`resolveCustomImageCompanyId`. Multi-company instances still fail
closed.
- Tests: three new route tests (explicit query context for a
multi-company actor, single-company-instance fallback for a
membership-less admin, fail-closed regression on a multi-company
instance), and updated the SSH-probe and probe-ambiguity tests for the
new fallback.
## Verification
- `cd server && pnpm vitest run
src/__tests__/environment-routes.test.ts` — 78 pass.
- `cd ui && pnpm vitest run src/pages/CompanyEnvironments.test.tsx` — 22
pass.
- Full `server` and `ui` vitest suites and `tsc --noEmit` on both
packages pass locally.
- Manual: on a managed instance, edit the managed sandbox environment,
add an env var, save. Before: 422. After: the save persists and the
PATCH carries `?companyId=`.
## Risks
- Low risk. The explicit query param path already existed on the server;
the UI now uses it.
- Behavioral shift: on single-company instances, environment
secret-context resolution (including `POST /environments/:id/probe`) now
resolves the only company instead of returning no context. That lets
probes resolve secret-backed config where they previously returned a 422
asking for an explicit companyId. Multi-company instances keep the
fail-closed behavior, covered by a regression test.
- Self-hosted single-company instances gain the same first-save fix; no
schema or config changes.
## Model Used
Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`, Anthropic) via Claude Code — extended
thinking, agentic tool use.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The server heartbeat system records each agent run and its retry
state
> - A workspace-busy deferral cancels one run before it inserts the
scheduled retry row
> - The test helper can return after the cancel write and before the
retry-row insert
> - A direct read can then return no row and fail a valid retry
assertion
> - This pull request makes presence reads wait for the retry row
> - The benefit is stable test coverage without a production behavior
change
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs: #10806
**What happened?**
The workspace-busy test read the retry row after the first deferral
write. The helper returned before the scheduled-retry insert completed.
The read then returned no row and failed the retry assertions.
**Expected behavior**
The test must wait until the scheduled-retry row exists before it checks
retry-row fields. The production write order must stay unchanged.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Add a 300 ms delay between the deferral writes.
2. Run `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-busy.test.ts`.
3. Observe failures at retry-row presence checks.
4. Add the bounded polling helper.
5. Run the test file again and observe that all presence checks pass.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Commit `d9b6e8a6e62b9b56919fc9c52d294e8ac569f70f`.
**Deployment mode**
Local test run from source.
## What Changed
- Add `waitForRetryRun`, which polls for the retry row with a 10 second
timeout and a 50 millisecond interval.
- Use the helper at every test site that reads a retry row after
deferral.
- Keep direct reads at absence assertions.
- Keep production code unchanged.
## Verification
- Injected a temporary 300 millisecond delay between the two production
writes and reproduced the five presence-site failures.
- Applied the helper with the delay and passed the test file 15 out of
15 times.
- Removed the temporary production delay.
- Ran the changed test file 25 consecutive times with 0 failures.
- Ran TypeScript checks for the changed test file with no errors.
## Risks
Low risk. This pull request changes test code only. The helper has a
bounded timeout. Production behavior and retry-row assertions remain
unchanged.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, reasoning mode, tool use, and code execution. The
runtime does not expose the context window size.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` /
`Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the
relevant issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The UI receives live run/issue events over a websocket at
`/api/companies/:id/events/ws`; the server authorizes upgrades with a
bearer token or a Better Auth session
> - On a cloud-managed deployment, browsers authenticate through trusted
`x-paperclip-cloud-*` headers injected by the managing front door — they
never hold a local Better Auth session, and the Express middleware lane
that understands those headers is not consulted for websocket upgrades
> - Every browser websocket upgrade behind the front door therefore
resolves no identity and is rejected 403: the live-events socket has
never connected on a managed instance, leaving permanent reconnect churn
and console failure noise while the UI silently degrades to polling
> - This pull request adds a cloud-actor lane to the upgrade
authorization, reusing the same trusted-header resolver the HTTP
middleware uses
> - The benefit is working realtime updates on managed instances, an end
to the reconnect churn, and unchanged self-hosted behavior
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No existing issue. Description follows the bug template:
**What happened?**
On a cloud-managed instance, the browser console shows `WebSocket
connection to 'wss://…/api/companies/<id>/events/ws' failed:` repeating
indefinitely for every company, on a healthy instance. The server
rejects each upgrade with 403 because `authorizeUpgrade` in
`server/src/realtime/live-events-ws.ts` only knows bearer tokens and
Better Auth sessions, while cloud-proxied browsers authenticate via
`x-paperclip-cloud-*` trusted headers (handled only by the Express
`actorMiddleware` lane in `server/src/middleware/auth.ts`).
**Expected behavior**
A browser that authenticates through the trusted cloud headers can open
the live-events websocket for any company in its membership scope,
exactly as it can call the HTTP API for those companies.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Run Paperclip in `authenticated` mode behind a proxy that injects the
`x-paperclip-cloud-*` headers with a valid
`PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_TENANT_SERVER_TOKEN`.
2. Load any company page in a browser (no local Better Auth session).
3. HTTP API calls succeed; every `/events/ws` upgrade is rejected 403
and the UI retries forever.
## What Changed
- `server/src/middleware/auth.ts`: `resolveCloudTenantActor` now accepts
a minimal `CloudActorHeaderSource` (`header(name)`) instead of an
Express `Request` — `Request` satisfies it unchanged — plus
`cloudActorHeaderSourceFromHeaders` to adapt raw
`IncomingMessage.headers`.
- `server/src/realtime/live-events-ws.ts`: `authorizeUpgrade` gains an
injected `resolveCloudActor` lane, tried before the Better Auth session
fallback in `authenticated` mode. A resolved cloud actor is
authoritative: the upgrade is authorized only for a company in the
actor's membership scope (`companyIds`, the same scope the HTTP lane
grants). Absent/unresolvable cloud headers fall through to the session
path.
- `server/src/index.ts`: wires `resolveCloudActor` through
`resolveCloudTenantActor` + the header shim. The resolver self-gates:
without `PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_TENANT_SERVER_TOKEN` and a matching trust token
it returns null, so self-hosted deployments never take this path.
- Tests: upgrade authorized for an in-scope company (session resolver
not consulted), rejected for an out-of-scope company, fall-through to
session auth when no cloud actor resolves; header-shim resolution from a
raw lowercased header map including `string[]` values.
## Verification
- `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/live-events-ws.test.ts
server/src/middleware/cloud-tenant-actor.test.ts` — 25 tests pass.
- `pnpm typecheck` in `server/` — clean.
- Not verified live end-to-end: that requires a managed instance running
this build; the direct probe evidence (HTTP authenticated fine, every WS
upgrade 403) matches the code path exactly.
## Risks
Low risk. The new lane only activates when the deployment configures the
cloud trust token and the request presents it; both checks already
protect the HTTP lane. Authorization scope is the same `companyIds` set
the HTTP middleware computes (primary stack company plus the user's real
membership rows). The cloud resolver's user/company materialization
writes are debounced (existing behavior shared with the HTTP lane), so
websocket reconnect storms do not amplify database writes. Self-hosted
instances see no behavioral change, covered by the fall-through test.
## Model Used
- Claude (Anthropic), Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`), via Claude Code
CLI with extended thinking and tool use (code search, edit, test
execution; diagnosis included live websocket handshake probes against a
managed instance).
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Dotta
Nicky Leach
Opaque
Dotta
LeeJ
Austin
scotttong
dependabot[bot]
Apolinario Ratio
Ravi
Eric Brookfield
Frank Gonnello
Tonio
dmndbrp-oss
Dylan Roy
Sergio-LPA
Jannes Stubbemann
Constantine
Daniel Sauer
Jonathan Reyes
Christian Lappin
edgardfrz
Devin Foley