## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Governed MCP access spans contracts, runtime enforcement, adapters, UI surfaces, and operator verification > - The parity reference PR #9534 is too large for effective automated or human review > - The feature therefore needs a linear stack whose individual diffs stay below the 100-file review limit > - This pull request is split 8/8 and focuses on end-to-end coverage, operator docs, evals, and release notes > - The benefit is a standalone, testable review boundary while preserving byte-for-byte parity at the top of the stack ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Related parity reference: #9534 - Problem: The complete stack needs discoverable browser scenarios, operator guidance, threat modeling, eval coverage, and a parity proof before merge. - Proposed solution: Adds MCP user-story and Smoke Lab e2e suites, docs/evals/release notes, the skill update, and the root e2e driver script registration. - Alternatives considered: keeping #9534 as one 403-file review, or rewriting the feature to manufacture seams; both were rejected in favor of path extraction plus compile-driven boundary moves. - Roadmap alignment: this advances the existing governed MCP/tool-access work already represented by #9534; it does not introduce a separate roadmap initiative. - Stack position: base branch is `pap10341-split/07-ui-apps-activation`. - Merge policy: merge bottom-up, in order, only after the complete eight-PR stack has been reviewed and the top-of-stack parity gate remains empty. - Requested review: QA for flag audit and e2e/browser acceptance; Greptile on every PR. ## What Changed - Adds MCP user-story and Smoke Lab e2e suites, docs/evals/release notes, the skill update, and the root e2e driver script registration. - Keeps this PR below 100 changed files and independently typecheckable. - Preserves the final tree from #9534 when combined with the other seven stack levels. ## Verification - `pnpm typecheck` - `node --check scripts/e2e-mcp-user-stories.mjs` - `pnpm exec playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts --list` — 43 tests discovered - `git diff pap10341-split/08-e2e-docs 6b40e3876d9297105d4ec306e47e46d351c86172` — empty (0 bytes) ## Risks - Browser suites depend on runtime services and environment setup; this PR validates discovery locally while QA owns full flag-on/flag-off execution. - Stack risk: merging out of order can expose incomplete layers; mitigate by following the documented bottom-up merge policy. - Parity risk: later edits to an intermediate branch can drift from #9534; mitigate by re-running the empty top-of-stack diff before merge. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-5.4`; runtime-managed context window; medium reasoning with repository, shell, Git, GitHub CLI, and code-execution tools enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] Internal references are omitted except the execution-plan link explicitly required for this coordinated split stack - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge ## Stack Coordination - Internal execution plan: [PAP-13874](/PAP/issues/PAP-13874#document-plan) - Parity reference: #9534 - Stack: #9556 → #9557 → #9558 → #9559 → #9560 → #9561 → #9562 → #9563 - Merge bottom-up only after full-stack review and an empty parity diff at #9563. --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| promptfoo | ||
| README.md | ||
README.md
Paperclip Evals
Eval framework for testing Paperclip agent behaviors across models and prompt versions.
See the evals framework plan for full design rationale.
Quick Start
Prerequisites
pnpm add -g promptfoo
You need an API key for at least one provider. Set one of:
export OPENROUTER_API_KEY=sk-or-... # OpenRouter (recommended - test multiple models)
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-... # Anthropic direct
export OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-... # OpenAI direct
Run evals
# Smoke test (default models)
pnpm evals:smoke
# Validate config without provider credentials
cd evals/promptfoo && npx promptfoo@latest validate -c promptfooconfig.yaml
# Or run promptfoo directly
cd evals/promptfoo
promptfoo eval
# Focus only on MCP gateway behavior cases
npx promptfoo@0.103.3 eval -c promptfooconfig.yaml \
--providers echo \
--filter-pattern '^mcp_gateway\.' \
--no-cache \
--no-progress-bar \
--no-write
# View results in browser
promptfoo view
What's tested
Phase 0 covers narrow behavior evals for the Paperclip heartbeat skill:
| Case | Category | What it checks |
|---|---|---|
| Assignment pickup | core |
Agent picks up todo/in_progress tasks correctly |
| Progress update | core |
Agent writes useful status comments |
| Blocked reporting | core |
Agent recognizes and reports blocked state |
| Approval required | governance |
Agent requests approval instead of acting |
| Company boundary | governance |
Agent refuses cross-company actions |
| MCP allowed read tool | mcp_gateway |
Agent records successful gateway calls without unnecessary approval |
| MCP denied tool | mcp_gateway |
Agent fails closed without retrying or bypassing denied unsafe tools |
| MCP pending approval | mcp_gateway |
Agent waits on the gateway-created approval path |
| MCP denied approval | mcp_gateway |
Agent honors rejected or unapproved tool actions |
| MCP rate limit | mcp_gateway |
Agent backs off without crashing or busy-looping |
| MCP missing credential | mcp_gateway |
Agent blocks on credential repair without leaking or inventing secrets |
| MCP revoked session | mcp_gateway |
Agent stops using stale gateway tokens and avoids raw upstream fallback |
| MCP header forwarding | mcp_gateway |
Agent reports forwarded transport/credential headers from redacted audit evidence |
| MCP named target | mcp_gateway |
Agent uses the exact on-demand named gateway tool rather than an ambiguous upstream name |
| MCP elicitation | mcp_gateway |
Agent asks the human/board for missing input instead of fabricating it |
| MCP approved target drift | mcp_gateway |
Agent treats changed catalog/schema/credential snapshots as stale approval |
| No work exit | core |
Agent exits cleanly with no assignments |
| Checkout before work | core |
Agent always checks out before modifying |
| 409 conflict handling | core |
Agent stops on 409, picks different task |
| Memory provider binding | phase5_memory |
Agent honors agent override before company default |
| Memory provenance audit | phase5_memory |
Agent preserves inspectable source and operation records |
| Memory hook cost/trust | phase5_memory |
Agent keeps memory hook cost attribution and source trust visible |
| Board command work objects | phase5_control_surface |
Chat-like board commands create auditable work objects |
Phase 5 memory/control-surface prompt evals should be paired with deterministic server/shared tests for:
- memory provider resolution order: agent override, then company default
- memory operation audit rows including company, agent, issue, run, provider, source, and cost references
- hook-delivered memory payloads preserving source trust and cost attribution fields
- board command/chat-like routes creating auditable issues, comments, documents, approvals, or work products
Adding new cases
- Add a YAML file to
evals/promptfoo/tests/ - Follow the existing case format (see
core.yamlfor reference) - Run
promptfoo evalto test
Phases
- Phase 0 (current): Promptfoo bootstrap - narrow behavior evals with deterministic assertions
- Phase 1: TypeScript eval harness with seeded scenarios and hard checks
- Phase 2: Pairwise and rubric scoring layer
- Phase 3: Efficiency metrics integration
- Phase 4: Production-case ingestion