## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Local adapters can confine agent processes with filesystem and
network sandbox policies
> - Allowlist confinement must still let an agent reach Paperclip's own
control plane and managed MCP servers
> - The Codex local adapter already marks those runtime-owned endpoints
as trusted, but the Claude local adapter did not
> - As a result, allowlisted Claude runs could not call their own
Paperclip API unless operators duplicated runtime URLs manually
> - This pull request mirrors the trusted-URL wiring in the Claude local
adapter and adds a regression test at the process-execution boundary
> - The benefit is that confined Claude agents retain their required
control-plane access without broadening the operator-managed network
allowlist
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #447
No exact public issue was found. The underlying bug is:
- **Observed:** with `claude_local` configured for local-process
`networkScope: "allowlist"`, the sandbox options omitted the
runtime-owned Paperclip API and MCP server URLs. Requests to those
endpoints could therefore be denied by confinement.
- **Expected:** Paperclip's own API URL and managed MCP server URLs are
passed as trusted sandbox targets, matching `codex_local` behavior.
- **Steps to reproduce:** configure a local Claude agent with allowlist
network confinement, omit the runtime Paperclip API URL from the
operator allowlist, and have the agent call its injected
`PAPERCLIP_API_URL`.
- **Version:** `ca92f727c5` (`origin/master` at branch creation).
- **Deployment mode:** local-process sandbox confinement in a local
deployment.
## What Changed
- Added the injected Paperclip API URL and runtime MCP server URLs to
`claude_local` sandbox `networkTrustedUrls`, filtering empty values.
- Added a unit test proving allowlist sandbox construction trusts
`PAPERCLIP_API_URL`.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run
packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/execute.acp-fallback.test.ts`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-claude-local typecheck`
## Risks
- Low risk. The change only affects confined local Claude processes and
trusts runtime-owned endpoints already injected by Paperclip.
- Operator-configured `networkAllowlist` behavior is unchanged; the
added URLs use the sandbox's separate trusted-target path.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex based on GPT-5 (exact serving snapshot and context-window
size are not exposed), with reasoning, repository inspection, shell tool
use, code editing, and test execution.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (not
applicable: behavior parity fix with no user-facing configuration
change)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
170c1e5adb