paperclip/server
nickyleach 4f443f293d docs(server): fix lifecycle and deferral claims in the recovery comment
The review-participant recovery comment said the row holds a null
responsible user only while queued. It does not say claimQueuedRun
can cancel a queued row before it resolves that value, so a
cancelled row keeps a null value for good. It also said resolving
the value at this insert would add a throw inside the release
transaction. The immediate-recovery writer resolves its value the
same way, in the same transaction, so that was not the actual
reason. State the real one: claimQueuedRun already resolves and
writes a responsible user for every queued run when it claims one,
so this writer leaves that work to it.

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-10 15:49:39 +00:00
..
scripts fix(server): bundle the vendored paperclip-runner instead of hand-mirroring its deps (#13121) 2026-09-09 16:38:17 -07:00
src docs(server): fix lifecycle and deferral claims in the recovery comment 2026-09-10 15:49:39 +00:00
CHANGELOG.md fix: bound workspace Git scans (#11572) 2026-08-17 22:11:30 -05:00
package.json fix(server): bundle the vendored paperclip-runner instead of hand-mirroring its deps (#13121) 2026-09-09 16:38:17 -07:00
tsconfig.json Fix root TypeScript solution config 2026-03-09 14:09:30 -05:00
vitest.config.ts fix(server): bundle the vendored paperclip-runner instead of hand-mirroring its deps (#13121) 2026-09-09 16:38:17 -07:00