paperclip/tests
Dotta 05735b3d87
fix(ui): show continuation actions in confirmation receipts (#12939)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Task interactions let an operator approve completion or ask an agent
to continue.
> - The server stores the continue choice as a rejected completion
request so it can resume the same task.
> - The task feed ignored the configured action label and showed the
generic text `Declined request`.
> - The generic text made a successful three-turn continuation look like
a failed request.
> - This pull request keeps the server state and shows the action that
the operator selected.
> - The benefit is an accurate task feed for legacy Codex and Runner
Codex.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A rejected confirmation always appeared as `Declined request`. The feed
did not use a custom rejection action such as `Continue work`.

**Expected behavior**

The resolved receipt and success toast must show the selected custom
action. Confirmations without a custom action must keep the current
fallback text.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Create a completion confirmation with `rejectLabel` set to `Continue
work`.
2. Select `Continue work` and enter a continuation note.
3. Open the completed task feed.
4. Observe that the old UI says `Declined request` instead of the
selected action.

**Paperclip version or commit**

`539c9212f4b98e37643f5a8e3b603f1b5845b5d7`

**Deployment mode**

GitHub Actions Runner E2E with warm Daytona sandboxes.

## What Changed

- Show `Selected “Continue work”` when a rejected confirmation has that
custom action label.
- Use the same action-aware text in the success toast.
- Keep `Declined request` as the fallback for confirmations without a
custom rejection label.
- Make the legacy warm-turn prompt ask if the task is ready to complete.
- Require both warm Daytona matrix cells to show two continuation
receipts and no generic decline receipt.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/pages/IssueDetail.test.tsx
ui/src/lib/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts
ui/src/components/task-chat/TaskChatInteractionCard.test.tsx`
- `pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit`
- `pnpm test:e2e:runner:typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build`
- `pnpm check:token-gates`
- Paid `daytona-warm-continuity` campaign: both three-turn cells passed
on attempt 1 ([workflow
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34052047946));
the downloaded evidence aggregates locally as 2/2. The trusted report
job did not publish because default branch `pnpm-lock.yaml` was
transiently behind its manifest.
- `pnpm typecheck` reached an unrelated `plugin-workspace-diff`
dependency type error after the current master manifest and lockfile
resolved different versions. The focused UI and runner checks pass.

## Risks

- Low risk. The database state and continuation behavior do not change.
- A custom rejection label now appears in resolved receipts and success
toasts.
- The paid warm Daytona suite has a stricter browser assertion.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used with version and capability
details
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either linked existing issues or described the issue in
this PR with the bug template fields
- [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues
or links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal task
identifier
- [x] I have run focused tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated the relevant E2E fixture and assertions
- [x] I have considered and documented the risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-09-06 13:56:18 -05:00
..
canary-onboarding fix(onboarding): preserve draft through company refetch (#12735) 2026-09-02 16:50:15 -05:00
e2e feat(agent-login): resume an active login session and permit concurrent login terminals (#12861) 2026-09-05 10:03:13 -07:00
perf/issue-detail Keep browser startup explicitly opt-in (#12435) 2026-08-29 12:08:35 -05:00
release-smoke Follow the current onboarding arc in the release smoke (#12423) 2026-08-28 07:21:08 -07:00
runner-acceptance test(runner): add credential-free acceptance foundation (#12652) 2026-09-01 04:46:04 -05:00
runner-e2e fix(ui): show continuation actions in confirmation receipts (#12939) 2026-09-06 13:56:18 -05:00
storybook-visual fix(ui): keep new task dialog visible above mobile keyboard (#11281) 2026-08-12 11:49:05 -04:00