## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Remote environments realize the workspace at a provider-owned path.
> - Run startup probes Git and network context before it starts the
agent.
> - The probe used the controller path inside the remote environment.
> - A missing directory stopped the run before any provider work began.
> - This pull request uses the remote execution target's working
directory.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #13094, which introduced this probe. Related: #8997 and #10419
address other workspace-directory handoffs; this patch fixes the newer
Git-context probe.
**What happened?**
Remote runs failed with `setup_failed: Could not read execution-target
Git context`, including tasks that did not use Git. The provider shell
could not enter the controller's workspace directory.
**Expected behavior**
Startup must inspect Git and network context in the realized remote
workspace.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Select a remote sandbox whose workspace is
`/home/daytona/paperclip-workspace`.
2. Start a task whose controller workspace is under
`/paperclip/instances/default/workspaces/`.
3. The startup probe exits when the controller directory does not exist
in the sandbox.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Reproduced on `622376e99` and in the regression test before this patch.
**Deployment mode**
Docker controller with a remote Daytona sandbox. The same helper also
serves SSH targets.
## What Changed
- Use `remote.remoteCwd` for the remote Git-context probe.
- Cover a missing controller directory in both credential modes.
- Verify that SSH reads Git metadata from the remote workspace even when
the caller directory exists.
## Verification
- Before the fix, both new missing-directory tests failed with the
reported error.
- The launcher environment suite passes: 18 tests.
- The adapter-utils suite passes: 1,085 passed, 11 skipped.
- Adapter-utils typecheck passes.
- A disposable sandbox with the affected deployment's image reproduced
the old `cd` failure and passed with the corrected helper. The sandbox
was deleted afterward.
- Full repository typecheck and build pass locally. All CI gates pass at
`61b522c`: regular test shards, serialized server suites, browser
shards, Runner verification, build, policy, and security checks.
- The first CI Build attempt hit a Runner suspension-acknowledgment
timeout outside the changed code. The affected 13-case recovery group
passes locally with its Rust fixtures built, and the unchanged CI job
passed on its single retry.
- The full serial local test run was stopped in favor of the complete CI
matrix; it is not claimed as a local pass.
## Risks
The probe now uses the provider-resolved target directory for sandbox
and SSH execution. Local execution keeps its existing directory. There
are no schema or API changes. Existing local credential and Git metadata
tests pass.
## Model Used
OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex, with tool-assisted code analysis, implementation,
and live and automated testing. The exact model identifier and
context-window size are not exposed by this session.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
3bc60dd8bf