## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Governed MCP access spans contracts, runtime enforcement, adapters, UI surfaces, and operator verification > - The parity reference PR #9534 is too large for effective automated or human review > - The feature therefore needs a linear stack whose individual diffs stay below the 100-file review limit > - This pull request is split 2/8 and focuses on database schema and shared governance contracts > - The benefit is a standalone, testable review boundary while preserving byte-for-byte parity at the top of the stack ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Related parity reference: #9534 - Problem: The governed access model needs additive persistence and synchronized shared types before server enforcement can compile. - Proposed solution: Adds migrations 0148–0169, tool-access and Smoke Lab schema, shared types/validators/gallery helpers, and the minimal compile-required contract consumers identified by boundary testing. - Alternatives considered: keeping #9534 as one 403-file review, or rewriting the feature to manufacture seams; both were rejected in favor of path extraction plus compile-driven boundary moves. - Roadmap alignment: this advances the existing governed MCP/tool-access work already represented by #9534; it does not introduce a separate roadmap initiative. - Stack position: base branch is `pap10341-split/01-demo-servers`. - Merge policy: merge bottom-up, in order, only after the complete eight-PR stack has been reviewed and the top-of-stack parity gate remains empty. - Requested review: QA for migrations/validators; Greptile on every PR. ## What Changed - Adds migrations 0148–0169, tool-access and Smoke Lab schema, shared types/validators/gallery helpers, and the minimal compile-required contract consumers identified by boundary testing. - Keeps this PR below 100 changed files and independently typecheckable. - Preserves the final tree from #9534 when combined with the other seven stack levels. ## Verification - `pnpm typecheck` — passed, including migration numbering and safety checks - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db test` — passed - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared test` — passed ## Risks - Migration or contract mistakes could affect every upper layer; all migrations are additive/idempotent and compile consumers are included in this boundary. - Stack risk: merging out of order can expose incomplete layers; mitigate by following the documented bottom-up merge policy. - Parity risk: later edits to an intermediate branch can drift from #9534; mitigate by re-running the empty top-of-stack diff before merge. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-5.4`; runtime-managed context window; medium reasoning with repository, shell, Git, GitHub CLI, and code-execution tools enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] Internal references are omitted except the execution-plan link explicitly required for this coordinated split stack - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge ## Stack Coordination - Internal execution plan: [PAP-13874](/PAP/issues/PAP-13874#document-plan) - Parity reference: #9534 - Stack: #9556 → #9557 → #9558 → #9559 → #9560 → #9561 → #9562 → #9563 - Merge bottom-up only after full-stack review and an empty parity diff at #9563. --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| agents/wiki-maintainer | ||
| fixtures/basic-root | ||
| migrations | ||
| skills | ||
| src | ||
| templates | ||
| tests | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| README.md | ||
| esbuild.config.mjs | ||
| package.json | ||
| rollup.config.mjs | ||
| tsconfig.json | ||
| vitest.config.ts | ||
README.md
LLM Wiki
Local-file LLM Wiki plugin for source ingestion, wiki browsing, query, lint, and maintenance workflows.
Scope
This package is the standalone home for LLM Wiki behavior. Wiki-specific routes, UI, prompts, tools, local-folder templates, migrations, fixtures, and tests live here rather than in Paperclip core.
The alpha surface includes:
- manifest-declared Wiki page, sidebar entry, and settings page
- trusted local folder declaration for
raw/,wiki/,AGENTS.md,IDEA.md,wiki/index.md, andwiki/log.md - plugin database namespace migration for wiki instances, sources, pages, operations, query sessions, and resource bindings
- managed
Wiki Maintaineragent, managedLLM Wikiproject, and paused managed routines for wiki update processing, lint, and index refresh - plugin-operation issue creation using
surfaceVisibility: "plugin_operation" - local source capture into
raw/with metadata rows in the plugin DB namespace - opt-in company-scoped Paperclip event ingestion controls for issues, comments, and documents; event ingestion is disabled by default and routes captured raw provenance into the default space only
- manual Paperclip project/root issue distillation and bounded backfill actions with explicit work items, operation issues, source caps, and estimated cost recording
- Paperclip-derived distillation (cursor windows, manual
distill-now, backfill) always writes into the default wiki space in Phase 1; non-default spaces remain on manual / raw-file ingest until per-space Paperclip ingestion profiles ship - Paperclip-derived distillation maintains
wiki/projects/<slug>/standup.mdas the executive current-state view for each represented project, alongside durablewiki/projects/<slug>/index.mdknowledge pages - wiki page writes with plugin path validation, atomic local-folder writes, metadata/revision rows, backlink extraction, and optional stale-hash protection
- wiki tools for search/read/write/propose patch/source/log/index/backlinks workflows
Phase 5 Security Gate
Paperclip-derived text ingestion stays limited to issue titles/descriptions, issue comments, and issue documents.
- Issue attachments/assets are metadata-only in Phase 5.
- Issue work products are metadata-only in Phase 5.
- The wiki must not fetch
/api/assets/:id/content, dereference work-producturlfields, or store those capability-bearing links in source bundles/snapshots.
The accepted policy lives in doc/plans/2026-05-06-llm-wiki-paperclip-asset-security-gate.md.
Development
pnpm install
pnpm dev # watch builds
pnpm dev:ui # local dev server with hot-reload events
pnpm test
From the Paperclip repo root:
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-llm-wiki typecheck
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-llm-wiki test
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-llm-wiki build
Alpha Verification
Run these commands from the Paperclip repo root before handing off alpha plugin changes:
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-llm-wiki typecheck
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-llm-wiki test
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-llm-wiki build
The focused Vitest suite covers:
- standalone package boundaries and package-local harness dependencies
- required local folder bootstrap writes
- raw source capture plus ingest metadata persistence
- hidden plugin-operation issue creation for ingest/query/file-as-page workflows
- disabled and enabled Paperclip event ingestion paths
- managed routine declarations, manual distill/backfill work items, source cap handling, and backfill project/date scoping
- atomic page writes, metadata/revision rows, backlinks, and stale-hash refusal
- query session creation, run-id recording, stream event forwarding, and completion updates
- filing a streamed query answer back into the wiki through a hidden operation
Remaining alpha gaps:
- Browser screenshot capture is maintained separately under
tests/screenshots; generatedscreenshots/outputs are local artifacts and are ignored by git. - Host-level plugin install and live agent invocation still need Paperclip server/runtime smoke coverage when preparing a release candidate.
Install Into Paperclip
curl -X POST http://127.0.0.1:3100/api/plugins/install \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"packageName":"/Users/dotta/paperclip/.paperclip/worktrees/PAP-3179-design-a-llm-wiki-plugin/packages/plugins/plugin-llm-wiki","isLocalPath":true}'
Build Options
pnpm builduses esbuild presets from@paperclipai/plugin-sdk/bundlers.pnpm build:rollupuses rollup presets from the same SDK.
After changing manifest-loaded assets such as skills, agent instructions, or templates, recompile the local plugin before re-enabling it:
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-llm-wiki build
The package-local dist/ directory is ignored by git, but local Paperclip
installs load the compiled dist/manifest.js and dist/worker.js files at
runtime. If activation failed before the rebuild, re-enable the plugin or
restart the Paperclip dev server so the host imports the fresh bundle.
Local File Layout
<configured-wiki-root>/
AGENTS.md
IDEA.md
.gitignore
raw/
.gitkeep
wiki/
index.md
log.md
sources/
.gitkeep
projects/
.gitkeep
<project-slug>/
index.md
standup.md
decisions.md
history.md
entities/
.gitkeep
concepts/
.gitkeep
synthesis/
.gitkeep
Use the settings page or bootstrap-root action to configure the folder and
write the starter files. The plugin uses Paperclip's local folder API for path
containment, symlink checks, read/write validation, and atomic writes.
Bootstrap preserves existing files rather than overwriting operator edits. The
default first-install skeleton is copied from the vanilla LLM Wiki layout, with
CLAUDE.md renamed to AGENTS.md and Paperclip project overviews, standups,
decisions, and history kept together under wiki/projects/<slug>/.
Managed Agent Instructions
Plugin-managed agent instruction bundles live under:
agents/<agent-key>/AGENTS.md
For this plugin the Wiki Maintainer source bundle is agents/wiki-maintainer/AGENTS.md.
Any additional files in that folder are installed as sibling instruction files
for the managed agent. The settings health check reports drift from these
defaults, and resetting the managed agent asks for confirmation before replacing
customized instructions.