9064cfd09e
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for companies that use AI agents for work > - Local adapters connect Paperclip agents to provider command line tools > - The Codex adapter stores login data in a shared company home > - A shared home cannot keep credentials for more than one Codex account > - This pull request gives each account a safe home and a matching company secret > - The benefit is that one company can use multiple Codex accounts at the same time ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem or motivation** A company can hold only one Codex subscription credential because device login uses one shared home. A second account cannot log in without replacing or conflicting with the first credential. **Proposed solution** This change validates the vendor account identifier, stores each credential in its own home, and creates a company secret that points to that home. Repeat login calls return success when the matching secret already exists. **Roadmap alignment** The change supports the roadmap goal for centrally managed secrets with scoped access and audited resolution. **Additional context** The security review returned approve with no blocking finding. The branch adds shared account-handle validation and tests for device login and the Codex local adapter. ## What Changed - Add strict allowlist validation for Codex account handles. - Store each Codex account credential in a separate home under the Codex cache root. - Verify that the resolved account home stays inside the cache root. - Create the `CODEX_HOME_<handle>` company secret for each account. - Keep repeat and concurrent login calls safe and idempotent. - Add shared helper and route, adapter, and validation tests. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local test` passes with 343 tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server test src/__tests__/agent-device-login-routes.test.ts` passes with 25 tests. - The adapter suite passes with 23 tests. - The shared package and Codex adapter typechecks pass. - Continuous integration must pass on every check before merge. ## Risks The account handle becomes part of a directory path and secret name. The strict allowlist and root containment check reduce path traversal risk. Existing single-account homes remain unchanged unless a new device login creates an account-specific home. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 (exact runtime model ID: gpt-5), with tool use and code execution. The runtime context window is not exposed in this run. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| src | ||
| DIRECTORY-CONSTRAINT-FINDINGS.md | ||
| README.md | ||
| package.json | ||
| tsconfig.json | ||
| vitest.config.ts | ||
README.md
@paperclipai/plugin-daytona
Published Daytona sandbox provider plugin for Paperclip.
This package lives in the Paperclip monorepo, but it is intentionally excluded from the root pnpm workspace and shaped to publish and install like a standalone npm package. That lets operators install it from the Plugins page by package name without introducing root lockfile churn for Daytona's SDK dependencies.
Install
From a Paperclip instance, install:
@paperclipai/plugin-daytona
The host plugin installer runs npm install into the managed plugin directory, so transitive dependencies such as @daytonaio/sdk are pulled in during installation.
Configuration
Configure Daytona from Instance Settings -> Environments, not from the plugin's plugin page.
- Put the Daytona API key on the sandbox environment itself.
- When you save an environment, Paperclip stores pasted API keys as company secrets.
DAYTONA_API_KEYremains an optional host-level fallback when an environment omits the key.- Optional
apiUrlandtargetsettings map directly to the Daytona SDK/client configuration. IfapiUrlis omitted, the Daytona SDK uses its default endpoint.
Notes:
- The current published Daytona SDK package is
@daytonaio/sdk. - The driver supports both
snapshot-based andimage-based sandbox creation. If both are set, validation rejects the config as ambiguous. - Reusable leases map to Daytona stop/start semantics. Non-reusable leases are deleted on release.
Local development
cd packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona
pnpm install --ignore-workspace --no-lockfile
pnpm build
pnpm test
pnpm typecheck
These commands assume the repo root has already been installed once so the local @paperclipai/plugin-sdk workspace package is available to the compiler during development.
Package layout
src/manifest.tsdeclares the sandbox-provider driver metadatasrc/plugin.tsimplements the environment lifecycle hookspaperclipPlugin.manifestandpaperclipPlugin.workerpoint the host at the built plugin entrypoints indist/