## Summary
- **Fix:** `integration-requests:review` crashed with `Attempt to read
property "email" on null` when a request's author no longer exists. The
command now renders a dash instead of assuming the `user` relation is
present.
- **Feature:** new terminal `done` status that marks an integration
request as shipped.
## The `done` status
Modeled after `not_doable` (a frozen, terminal state):
- Shown on the board, sinking to the bottom regardless of votes.
- Can no longer be voted on or unvoted (`removeVote` returns 404).
- Drops its public comment when set, so the board shows no stale note.
- Available in both `integration-requests:review` flows (pending review
and `--all`).
Frontend gets a `Done` badge and an `isFrozen()` helper that replaces
the scattered `=== 'not_doable'` checks gating the vote/unvote buttons.
## Tests
- 6 new feature tests: visibility without comment, bottom ordering,
vote/unvote blocked, command sets `done` and clears the comment, and the
command tolerating an orphaned author.
- `php artisan test tests/Feature/IntegrationRequestTest.php` → 34
passed.
- Board vitest suite, Pint, ESLint and Prettier all green.
## What
Prevent adding or modifying votes on requests marked as **not-doable**.
- **Backend** (`removeVote`): a vote cast before a request was marked
not-doable could still be removed, mutating a frozen tally. It now
returns `404`, mirroring `vote()` which already rejected not-doable
requests.
- **Frontend**: hide the unvote (chevron-down) button for not-doable
requests; the vote button was already disabled for them.
## Test
Added a feature test: vote → request becomes not-doable → `DELETE` vote
returns `404` and the tally is unchanged.
## Summary
- Raise the monthly integration-action quota for paying users: free plan
keeps **3** actions, pro plan gets **9** (resolved via
`User::hasProPlan()`, so self-hosted instances with subscriptions
disabled get the full quota).
- Votes are no longer toggles. Each vote spends one action and pushes
the request up the board, so a user can back the same integration
multiple times. The `(integration_request_id, user_id)` unique index is
dropped (with a standalone FK index added first, since MySQL relied on
the unique one).
- Let users undo a vote, **but only one cast in the current month**. The
refund maps back to the current quota and previous months' tallies stay
locked. The board exposes `can_unvote` and shows a `ChevronDown` control
next to the upvote button, backed by a new `DELETE
/integration-requests/{id}/vote` route.
## Tests
- Feature tests for the free (3) and pro (9) quotas, repeated voting up
to the limit, undoing a current-month vote (and recovering the action),
and the previous-month vote being non-removable.
- Updated the board fixture and added the `Remove one vote` Spanish
translation.
## What
- **Markdown comments**: admin comments on the integration board now
render as markdown (`react-markdown` + `remark-gfm`) instead of plain
text. Links open in a new tab; blockquotes, lists and bold are styled.
Comments are admin-only (set via CLI), so the content is trusted.
- **`in_progress` status**: new status, visible to everyone and votable
like `approved`, with an optional public comment. Lets the admin signal
an integration is actively being built.
- **`integration-requests:review` rework**:
- Any decision can now move a request to any status (approve / in
progress / reject / not doable), not just the pending ones.
- New `--all` flag prints the full list with a `#` column so the admin
can pick a request by number and change its status.
- `not doable` requires a comment; `in progress` allows an optional one;
approve/reject clears any stale public comment.
## New dependencies
- `react-markdown`, `remark-gfm` (approved with the author).
## Tests
- 24 feature tests passing, incl. `--all` status change, `in_progress`
visibility + voting, and updated review-command option sets.
- Frontend vitest covering markdown rendering (link + blockquote).
## Summary
Adds a `not_doable` status to integration requests for cases we've
reviewed but can't implement (e.g. no public API).
- **Applied with a comment** — the `integration-requests:review` command
now offers a `not doable` choice that requires a comment explaining why.
The comment is stored on the request and shown to users.
- **Shown at the end** — not-doable requests stay visible to everyone
but sink to the bottom of the board regardless of their votes, with the
comment rendered below the name.
- **Not votable** — voting is blocked both in the UI (disabled button)
and the backend (404), even for the author.
- **Rejected stays hidden** — rejected requests never appear in the list
(unchanged behaviour, now covered by a test).
## Changes
- `IntegrationRequestStatus` enum: new `NotDoable` case + label.
- Migration: nullable `comment` text column on `integration_requests`.
- `IntegrationRequestController`: list includes not-doable for everyone,
ordered last; vote guard rejects not-doable.
- `ReviewIntegrationRequestsCommand`: `not doable` option with a
required comment prompt.
- Board component: not-doable badge, comment, disabled voting.
- Factory `notDoable()` state, `es.json` translation, feature tests.
## Testing
- `php artisan test tests/Feature/IntegrationRequestTest.php` — 21
passed
- `vendor/bin/pint --dirty`, `bun run format`, `bun run lint` — clean
## What
The user matching \`ADMIN_EMAIL\` curates the integration-requests
board, so they get special treatment:
- **No monthly cap** — \`actionsRemaining()\` reports a full quota for
the admin, so neither the backend checks nor the frontend buttons ever
gate them.
- **Auto-approved proposals** — requests created by the admin are stored
as \`approved\` instead of \`pending\`, skipping moderation.
## How
- New \`User::isAdmin()\` helper, mirroring \`isDemoAccount()\`,
comparing against \`config('mail.admin_email')\` (already wired to
\`ADMIN_EMAIL\`).
- \`IntegrationRequestController::actionsRemaining()\` early-returns the
limit for the admin.
- \`IntegrationRequestController::store()\` sets \`status\` to
\`Approved\` for the admin.
## Tests
- Added a feature test covering the admin bypassing the monthly limit
and auto-approval. All 16 \`IntegrationRequestTest\` tests pass.
## What
A community board where users **propose** a bank/service (name + link)
and **vote** on the integrations they want most, so we can prioritise by
real demand.
## How it works
- **Global board**: a shared list sorted by votes desc. `has_voted` and
the monthly quota are per user.
- **Limit**: 3 combined actions (proposal + vote) per user per calendar
month. Creating a proposal **auto-votes** it → costs 2 actions.
- **Moderation**: proposals start as `pending` (visible only to their
author, with a "Pending review" badge); `approved` ones are visible to
everyone. You can't vote on what you can't see (404). The `php artisan
integration-requests:review` command approves/rejects pending ones.
- **Access**:
- Bottom drawer (Vaul, ~95vh) that opens the same board.
- Entry points: the **connect-bank** dialog (bank-selector step), the
**create-account** dialog, and a global **"Request integration"** item
in the user menu (above Support) → available on any screen.
- The `/integration-requests` URL renders the **dashboard** with the
drawer opened on top (behind auth + verified + onboarded + subscribed).
- **Seed**: a migration that inserts Bitunix, XTB, Kraken, Degiro and
Interactive Brokers as `approved` and self-voted by the earliest-created
user (idempotent, no-op when no users exist).
## Endpoints
- `GET /integration-requests` → dashboard + drawer.
- `GET /integration-requests/data` → board state as JSON (feeds the
drawer).
- `POST /integration-requests` → create a proposal (+ auto-vote).
- `POST /integration-requests/{id}/vote` → toggle vote.
## Tests
- 15 Feature tests (access, status visibility, monthly limit, auto-vote,
vote toggle, review command) plus the user-menu tests. All green;
`pint`/`eslint`/`prettier`/`tsc`/PHPStan clean.
## Notes / follow-ups
- No Pennant flag (ships to everyone). No dedup of duplicate proposals
(moderation covers it).
- Seeding 5 integrations to one user uses up that user's monthly quota
(only affects that account via the UI).
Víctor Falcón