Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Víctor Falcón d55c3f41df
fix(security): scope job-status endpoints to owner + feature-area fixes (#627)
## Summary

Starts from a security finding on the background-job status endpoints
and folds in the most important issues surfaced by a follow-up review of
the same feature area (categorization backfill, bulk rule re-evaluation,
automation-rule apply).

Each change is its own commit.

## Changes

### 1. `fix(security)` — scope job-status cache keys to the owning user
The categorization, bulk re-evaluation, and apply status endpoints
looked jobs up by a bare job UUID with no user scoping. Any
authenticated user who obtained another user's job id could poll its
progress payload. Cache keys now include the owning user's id, so a
status request keyed by the polling user's id resolves only that user's
own jobs — a mismatched owner falls through to the existing 404. No
ownership store or extra lookup. Cross-user isolation tests added for
all three endpoints.

### 2. `fix(automation-rules)` — re-check `only_uncategorized` at apply
time
The apply flow cached a match snapshot for up to 15 min (keyed only by
`rule.updated_at`) and applied the rule's category to every id in it
without re-checking eligibility. A transaction categorized *after* the
snapshot (by the user, a sibling rule, or a concurrent AI backfill) was
silently re-categorized and stamped `category_source=Rule`. Now
re-filtered through `shouldSkipForOnlyUncategorized()` at apply time;
skipped rows are no longer counted as changed.

### 3. `perf(automation-rules)` — memoize rule set per user in
`applyRules()`
Bulk re-evaluation calls `applyRules()` once per transaction, and each
call re-queried the user's whole rule set + labels — an N+1 scaling with
transaction count (the sibling apply job already loaded rules once).
Memoized per user for the service instance's lifetime (resolved fresh
per job, so rules created mid-run are intentionally not seen).
Query-count test asserts one `automation_rules` query regardless of
transaction count.

### 4. `fix(transactions)` — stop polling when the job never starts
The re-evaluate and apply pollers rescheduled on any non-terminal
status, including `pending`. If the queue worker is down the job never
runs, `failed()` never fires, and the client polled for the full
hour-long TTL with a stuck spinner. Now gives up after 30 consecutive
`pending` ticks (~30s), mirroring the guard the AI-categorization poller
already has. Long `processing` runs are unaffected.

### 5. `test(automation-rules)` — cover apply job execution and failure
branches
`ApplySingleAutomationRuleJob` was only asserted to be *pushed*; its
`handle()` body and `failed()` branch had no coverage, and
`ReEvaluateTransactionRulesJob::failed()` was untested too. Added direct
`handle()`/`failed()` tests pinning the progress-cache payloads.

## Deferred follow-ups (surfaced by review, not in this PR)

- **Consolidate the three frontend pollers onto `usePollJobStatus`** —
they hand-roll `setTimeout` loops and don't tear down on unmount (can
`setState`/`onClose` after the dialog closes). The hook already exists
and is unmount-safe; routing all three through it would also make the
`pending` cap unit-testable. The cap in change #4 currently mirrors the
already-shipped AI poller and is not separately unit-tested.
- **`noteAlreadyPresent()` uses a substring match**
(`AutomationRuleService`) — a rule note that is a substring of an
existing note is silently not appended. Should compare note lines
exactly.
- **No dedup/lock on concurrent apply/re-evaluate jobs** — note appends
are a non-atomic read-then-write, so two concurrent jobs can duplicate a
note. Category/label writes are already idempotent.
- **Transient 404 → false "failed"** — a mid-run cache
eviction/TTL-expiry (or the deploy window of change #1, where an
in-flight job's pre-deploy key is orphaned) makes the poller surface a
false failure. Retry a few times on transient errors before giving up.
- **`matches()` pagination** advances `next_offset` by fetched rows, not
page-window size — deleted ids can stall infinite scroll before reaching
`total`.
- **"Apply to N" count / encrypted-skip counts** can be stale or
under-report vs what's actually processed.
- **Job-trait convention drift** between the three jobs (modern
`Queueable` vs legacy trait stack).

## Testing
- `vendor/bin/pint --test` — pass
- `bun run format` / `bun run lint` — pass (one pre-existing unrelated
warning in `chart.tsx`)
- Affected Pest suites (apply, re-evaluate, evaluation, rule,
categorization, apply-rule-suggestions) — 94 tests pass
2026-07-03 14:49:32 +02:00
Víctor Falcón 7e36bbafef
feat(ai): dismissable AI consent banner that stops after the first decision (#617)
## What

The transactions AI consent banner now lets users decline, tells them
the outcome, and stops appearing once they've decided.

- **Dismiss option**: an X button before "Enable AI" permanently hides
the banner without granting consent.
- **Show only until the first decision**: the choice is persisted on
`users.ai_consent_prompt_dismissed_at` (set on both accept and dismiss).
The banner shows only while the user hasn't responded and never
reappears afterwards — even if they later revoke consent from settings.
- **Clear feedback**: accepting or dismissing shows a toast stating
whether AI was enabled and that the choice can be changed anytime in
**Settings > Manage Plan**.
- **Full-width layout on desktop**: the banner content spans the full
available width (button pushed to the right, text on a single line). The
narrow stacked layout is kept for mobile only.

## How

- New `POST ai/consent/dismiss` endpoint
(`AiConsentController::dismiss`).
- `User::dismissAiConsentPrompt()` (idempotent) +
`hasDismissedAiConsentPrompt()`; `store` now also marks the prompt
dismissed on accept.
- Migration adds the nullable `ai_consent_prompt_dismissed_at`
timestamp.
- `TransactionController` passes `aiConsentPromptDismissed` to the page.

## Tests

- `AiConsentTest`: idempotent dismissal, dismissal without consent, and
accept marking the prompt dismissed.
- Full consent + backfill suite and the `create a transaction` browser
test pass; pint / lint / format clean.
2026-07-01 07:26:36 +00:00
Víctor Falcón 9a458b1031
feat(ai): manage AI consent outside onboarding with live backfill (#591)
## Summary

Lets existing (non-onboarding) users discover and manage AI
categorization, gated behind a new Pennant feature flag. When a flagged
paid user grants consent, every uncategorized transaction is categorized
in the background with live, on-screen feedback.

Enable per user: `php artisan feature:enable AiConsentSettings
user@example.com`

## What's included

**Feature flag**
- New `AiConsentSettings` Pennant flag (off by default), exposed to the
frontend via the shared `features` prop.

**Billing settings (`/settings/billing`)**
- When the flag is active, a section to grant or revoke AI consent
(checkbox → `POST`/`DELETE /ai/consent`).

**Transactions page**
- A consent prompt rendered as the first row of the transactions table
(new `DataTable` `topRow` slot), styled with the shared gradient
`AiSparkleIcon`. Only shown to paid users with the flag who haven't
consented yet.
- An inline "Enable AI" button records consent without leaving the page.

**Backfill on consent**
- Granting consent dispatches a queued
`CategorizeUncategorizedTransactionsJob` that categorizes all of the
user's uncategorized transactions, **most recent first**, recording
progress in the cache.
- The transactions page polls a new status endpoint (`GET
/ai/categorization/{jobId}/status`): visible uncategorized rows show a
spinner + pulse while the backfill runs, categories stream in via
partial reloads, and a toast tracks `processed / total` until
completion.

## Notes / decisions

- **Polling, not websockets** — the project has no broadcasting
configured; this mirrors the existing `ReEvaluateTransactionRules` job +
status-endpoint pattern.
- The backfill job is kept separate from
`CategorizeOnboardingTransactionsJob` so the onboarding pass stays
progress-free (small, commented duplication).
- Reuses the existing `AiCategorizationGate` (config kill-switch + pro
plan + active consent) — free users and disabled-AI never dispatch the
job.
- Not included (YAGNI): cancelling an in-flight backfill on revoke;
persisting the spinner across full page reloads.

## Testing

- New Pest coverage: feature-flag exposure, billing/transactions consent
props, consent-triggered dispatch + gating, the status endpoint
(200/404), job progress recording, and recent-first ordering.
- `php artisan test --exclude-testsuite=Browser` passes (one unrelated,
pre-existing `DashboardTest` failure on `main`).
- Pint, Prettier and ESLint clean.
2026-06-25 10:50:35 +02:00
Víctor Falcón 8056ede636
feat(ai): suggest automation rules during onboarding (#523)
Suggests transaction categorization rules during onboarding.

After a sync or import, it groups the uncategorized transactions, asks
Gemini (via laravel/ai) to map the common merchants to categories, and
shows the results for review. The user edits or drops any and creates
the ones they want. During onboarding the accepted rules also categorize
existing transactions right away.

Off by default: it needs the `AiRuleSuggestions` Pennant flag and a
per-user AI consent. The model and thresholds are config-driven.
`ai:suggest-rules {user}` prints what a user would get.

The settings-page surface and monthly regeneration are a follow-up.
2026-06-13 22:51:15 +02:00