## Summary
A credit card is a spending account, not wealth. This change:
- **Excludes credit cards from net worth entirely** — they no longer add
to *or* subtract from the net worth total, the evolution chart, or its
trends. They are filtered out at the source, so every net-worth
aggregation (backend summary + frontend chart/trend/MoM) is consistent.
- **Shows the credit card balance as a positive figure** on the
per-account cards, on both the dashboard and the Accounts page (like any
other account).
- **Fixes a loan sign inconsistency**: a loan used to show *positive* on
the Accounts page but *negative* on the dashboard. The Accounts list now
applies the liability sign too, so loans render negative in both places.
### Why
A user reported that a credit card showed as a positive balance on the
Accounts screen but dragged their net worth down on the dashboard — the
same account rendered with opposite signs on the two screens. The root
cause was that credit cards were modelled as liabilities (like loans)
and each screen computed the balance through a different path. Product
decision: a credit card is spendable credit, so its balance is shown
as-is and simply doesn't participate in net worth.
## Behavior
| Account (e.g. 90k / 50k) | Per-account cards (dashboard + Accounts) |
Net worth chart & total |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Credit card** | `+90,000` | **excluded** (not counted) |
| **Loan** | `−50,000` (was `+50,000` on Accounts) | subtracts
(unchanged) |
| Checking / savings / … | unchanged | unchanged (asset) |
## ⚠️ Existing-data impact
Previously credit cards were forced to **reduce** net worth
(`-abs(balance)`). With this change they are excluded, so **users with
existing credit-card accounts will see their net worth rise** by
whatever their cards used to subtract. This is a deliberate semantic
change, not a migration — no stored balances are altered.
## Implementation
- `AccountType::countsInNetWorth()` — new predicate, `false` only for
credit cards; `calculateNetWorthAt()` skips excluded types.
- `AccountType::reducesNetWorth()` / `LIABILITY_TYPES` — now only
`loan`, so `netWorthContribution()` renders credit cards positive on the
per-account cards.
- `net-worth-chart.tsx` — credit cards filtered out of
`includedAccounts` (one point that cascades to segments, totals, trends
and `useChartViews`).
- `Accounts/Index.tsx` — applies `netWorthContribution()` so loans
render negative, matching the dashboard.
## Testing
- Backend: `AccountTypeTest` (32) and `DashboardAnalyticsTest` (credit
card excluded, loan still subtracts) — green.
- Frontend: `chart-calculations.test.ts` (37) — green.
- `pint`, `prettier`, `eslint` — clean.
Browser QA skipped per request (the logged-in flow is also currently
blocked locally by pending Spaces migrations). Logic is fully covered by
the tests above.
## What
Makes **Wise** connections support credential updates, like every other
API-key provider.
Wise was the only API-key provider not wired into the credential-update
path:
`ConnectionController::validateProviderCredentials()` had no Wise arm,
so it
fell to the `Unsupported provider` default, and the update dialog
(driven by the
provider registry's `updatable` flag) rendered nothing. A Wise
connection in an
auth-error state therefore showed an **Update Credentials** button that
opened
an empty, unusable dialog.
## Fix
- Add the Wise validation arm in `validateProviderCredentials`
(`WiseClient::getProfiles()`). The validation rules and the
`api_token` → column mapping already come from `BankingProvider`'s
credential
registry, so nothing else on the backend changes.
- Drop the now-unused `updatable` flag from the connect-providers
registry —
every connect provider is updatable — and simplify
`update-credentials-dialog`
to render fields for any registry provider.
## Tests
- Updating Wise credentials with a valid token succeeds (status back to
active,
token stored, sync dispatched).
- `BankingProviderTest`: every API-key provider declares credential
fields,
guarding against adding a provider without an update path again.
Follow-up to #581 (this branch is off the updated `main`).
## What
Adds **Interactive Brokers** as a banking sync provider (investment
account, balances only), mirroring the Indexa Capital integration.
It uses the **Flex Web Service** rather than IBKR's Web API: the Web API
requires registering as an IBKR third party (business entity, Compliance
approval, RSA-signed OAuth, ~3-5 weeks), which is overkill for read-only
balance sync. Flex is a read-only token + Query ID model that fits our
existing API-key provider shape.
### How the sync works
- The user creates an Activity Flex Query (NAV + Open Positions) and a
Flex Web Service token in their IBKR Client Portal, then pastes both.
- Client flow: `SendRequest` → reference code → poll `GetStatement` →
parse the XML statement.
- Mapping: `EquitySummaryByReportDateInBase@total` → `balance` (daily
rows give historical backfill on first sync); `Σ(OpenPosition
costBasisMoney × fxRateToBase) + cash` → `invested_amount`, so **profit
derives as `balance − invested_amount`** (unrealized P&L), like Indexa
Capital. Everything is already in base currency, so no FX conversion is
needed.
- One statement covers every account, so the syncer fetches once per
connection to respect IB's per-query rate limit.
- IB returns HTTP 200 with an error XML, so the client translates Flex
error codes into the exceptions the sync job already understands:
`RequestException(401)` for token problems, `RequestException(429)` for
throttling, `TransientBankingProviderException` otherwise.
### Connect flow
- New connect/update-credentials endpoints validate the credentials by
pulling a statement, then build pending accounts from it.
- Credentials reuse the encrypted `api_token` (Flex token) and
`api_secret` (Flex Query ID) columns — **no migration**.
- The IB option (two fields) is added to the connect dialog, inline
connect flow, and update-credentials dialog, with Spanish translations.
## Feature flag (why this is a draft)
Gated behind a Pennant feature `App\Features\InteractiveBrokers` (off by
default). It was built against documented/open-source Flex XML fixtures,
**not a live IBKR account** (we don't have one). Before enabling,
validate against a real account (beta tester or a free IBKR account):
```
php artisan feature:enable InteractiveBrokers user@example.com
```
If the parser needs tweaks against real XML, they should be minor
(field-name level).
## Tests
- Client + balance sync: NAV → balance, invested/profit, daily backfill,
since-date incremental, multi-account, GetStatement polling, token-401 /
rate-limit-429 mapping.
- Controller: feature-flag gate (403), valid/invalid credentials,
subscription gate, onboarding auto-create, validation.
- Factory wiring, enum cases, job-level sync, feature-flag visibility
(vitest).
- Spanish translations added (enforced by `LocalizationTest`).
All green: `pint --test`, `phpstan`, OpenBanking + localization suite,
vitest.
## What
Unifies keys that were repeated across the codebase into two PHP enums
as the single source of truth. Two independent commits:
### `refactor(banking)` — `BankingProvider` enum
- New `App\Enums\BankingProvider` (`indexacapital`, `binance`,
`bitpanda`, `coinbase`, `wise`, `enablebanking`).
- `BankingConnection`'s `provider` column is cast to the enum → magic
strings gone from the model, controllers (`match`), requests, jobs,
commands, factory and `where('provider', ...)`.
- Logic that was duplicated, now on the enum:
- `usesApiKey()` — API-key auth (everything except EnableBanking).
- `defaultAccountType()` — provider → account type (removes the
duplicated ternary in `CreatesAccountsFromPending` and
`AccountMappingController`).
### `refactor(i18n)` — `Locale` enum
- New `App\Enums\Locale` (`en`/`es`/`fr`).
- Unifies the `['en','es','fr']` list (validation in `SetLocale` and
`ProfileUpdateRequest` via `Rule::enum`) and the `Accept-Language`
detection (`Locale::detectFromHeader`), previously duplicated in
`SetLocale` and `CreateNewUser`.
## Interaction with Wise (PR #525)
Rebasing onto Wise surfaced two issues this PR fixes:
1. **`isWise()` was broken** once `provider` is cast (it compared `===
'wise'` against an enum → always `false`).
2. **Account type**: Wise uses an API key (✓ it gets the auth-failed
email) but is a **checking** account, not an investment one. Account
type now flows through `defaultAccountType()` (Wise/EnableBanking →
Checking; indexa/binance/bitpanda/coinbase → Investment).
## Behavior change (minor)
`CreateNewUser` now detects `fr` at registration (previously only
`es`/`en`), consistent with the existing French support.
## Out of scope
- Frontend (`['indexacapital','binance',...]`, `provider: string`):
syncing TS with the PHP enums would need typegen. It still receives the
string via `->value`.
- `TransactionSource::Wise/EnableBanking`: a separate enum (transaction
origin), not a duplicated check.
## Tests
- New: `tests/Unit/Enums/BankingProviderTest.php`,
`tests/Unit/Enums/LocaleTest.php`.
- `vendor/bin/pint --test` ✓ · Larastan ✓ · full suite (excluding
Browser) **1615/1616** ✓.
## Summary
- Adds **real estate** as a new account type (`real_estate`) for
tracking property assets within the existing Accounts page
- Properties store metadata (type, address, purchase price/date, area,
notes) in a dedicated `real_estate_details` table with a one-to-one
relationship to accounts
- Properties can be **linked to a loan account** (mortgage) to
implicitly calculate equity — property value counts as asset (+), linked
loan counts as liability (-)
- Market value is tracked as the account balance and uses "market value"
terminology throughout the UI
## What's included
### Backend
- `PropertyType` enum (Residential, Commercial, Land, Vacation, Other)
- `RealEstateDetail` model, factory, migration, policy
- `StoreRealEstateDetailRequest` and `UpdateRealEstateDetailRequest`
form requests
- `RealEstateDetailController` with `update()` for editing property
details
- Extended `Settings\AccountController@store` to create
`RealEstateDetail` when type is `real_estate`
- Extended `AccountController@show` to load real estate detail, linked
loan with bank info, and available loan accounts
- Extended `AccountController@index` SQL ordering to include
`real_estate`
- Conditional validation rules in `StoreAccountRequest` for real estate
fields
### Frontend
- New `real_estate` type in `account.ts` with `PropertyType`,
`AreaUnit`, `RealEstateDetail` interface, and helper functions
- Conditional real estate fields in `account-form.tsx` (property type,
address, purchase price, purchase date, area, linked loan, notes)
- `PropertyDetailsCard` component in `Accounts/Show.tsx` with view and
inline edit modes
- "Update market value" terminology in balance update buttons for real
estate accounts
- `real_estate` added to account type ordering and groups on the Index
page
- Wayfinder routes regenerated
### Tests
- 22 feature tests covering creation, validation, show page, index
ordering, updating details, IDOR protection, model relationships, and
soft delete behavior
- Unit test updates for `AccountType` enum (`reducesNetWorth`,
`isNonTransactional`)
### Translations
- 32 new Spanish translation strings for all real estate UI
## Design decisions
- Real estate accounts are **non-transactional** (like
investment/retirement) — balance-only tracking for now. Future iteration
will link transactions directly for rental income/expense tracking
- **Single loan per property** via direct FK from
`real_estate_details.linked_loan_account_id`
- No encryption on address/notes fields (opted out per discussion)
- No separate sidebar page — real estate is a grouped section within the
existing Accounts page
## Summary
- Adds `Savings` to the list of account types that support invested
amount tracking, alongside `Investment` and `Retirement`
- Decouples `supportsInvestedAmount()` from
`NON_TRANSACTIONAL_ACCOUNT_TYPES` in TypeScript, since savings accounts
are transactional but now also support invested amount tracking
- Updates unit tests to reflect savings accounts supporting invested
amounts
This enables remunerated savings accounts to track invested money vs.
current balance to visualize gains/losses — the same way investment and
pension accounts already do.
## Why
Investment and retirement accounts show balance over time, but there's
no way to see how much money was actually put in versus how much is
current value. Users can't tell at a glance whether their investments
are up or down.
## What
Adds an "invested amount" tracking system across the full stack:
**Backend**
- New `invested_amount` column on `account_balances` (nullable
bigInteger, cents, per-date)
- Auto-sync from providers: Indexa Capital (instruments_cost +
cash_amount), Bitpanda (fiat deposit/withdrawal history), Binance
(90-day windowed deposit/withdrawal with crypto→fiat conversion)
- Manual input support via Update Balance dialog
- Historical invested amount data in all balance evolution APIs (net
worth, account detail)
**Frontend**
- Dashed line on sparkline charts (dashboard + accounts page) showing
per-point historical invested amount alongside balance
- Dashed line on account detail charts (daily AreaChart + monthly
ComposedChart)
- Tooltips with labeled rows: Balance, Invested, Gain/loss (color-coded)
- Invested amount column in balances history modal
- Invested amount field in balance import wizard (CSV mapping)
- Demo account seeder updated with invested amount data
## Screenshots
<img width="1301" height="750" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0f05ecd0-8b98-47b4-9fa4-027f0311e3bb"
/>
<img width="744" height="374" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c4daa816-dee0-4f94-957f-317a13bc80d5"
/>
<img width="1267" height="738" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/21df350c-6954-4ff5-8b3c-b858df3a8b3a"
/>
<img width="1301" height="828" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/16f5f021-a926-4e8e-a999-c4ca32d1ea3d"
/>
<img width="1274" height="845" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/62f2dfc0-04f0-4bdb-b072-cf7cd1be77d3"
/>
Víctor Falcón