honcho/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/2-quality-report.yml

88 lines
2.8 KiB
YAML

name: Memory / recall quality
description: Conclusions, representations, or dialectic answers are wrong, noisy, missing, or low-quality — not a hard crash.
title: "[Quality] "
labels: ["quality"]
body:
- type: markdown
attributes:
value: |
Use this when Honcho runs without erroring, but **memory formation or recall quality** is off (bad conclusions, missed facts, weak chat answers, polluted representations, etc.).
For crashes, 5xxs, auth failures, or incorrect API mechanics, use the **Bug report** template instead.
**Do not paste production user content, full peer representations, or secrets.** Redact or invent a minimal synthetic example.
- type: dropdown
id: deploy_mode
attributes:
label: Deploy mode
options:
- Managed (api.honcho.dev / app.honcho.dev)
- Self-hosted
- Unsure
validations:
required: true
- type: input
id: version
attributes:
label: Honcho version
description: Server image tag or release, and SDK version if you use one. Write "managed" if you are not self-hosting.
placeholder: e.g. server v2.4.1, honcho-ai 2.1.0
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
id: description
attributes:
label: What is wrong with the quality?
description: Describe the failure mode (noise, omission, contradiction, staleness, over/under-generalization, etc.).
placeholder: After ingesting messages about X, Honcho concludes Y / chat answers Z…
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
id: repro
attributes:
label: Minimal scenario
description: >
Smallest synthetic message sequence or setup that triggers the issue.
Prefer invented names/facts over real user data. Include observer/observed
peer setup if relevant (self vs cross-peer).
placeholder: |
1. Peers: alice (user), bot (agent); session S
2. Messages ingested: …
3. Query / conclusion listing shows: …
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
id: config
attributes:
label: Relevant config
description: >
Custom instructions, provider/model, deriver/dream settings, or workspace/peer
config that affects reasoning. Redact secrets.
placeholder: |
Provider/model: …
Custom instructions: (summary or redacted)
Other: …
validations:
required: false
- type: textarea
id: evidence
attributes:
label: Evidence
description: Redacted conclusion text, chat excerpts, or counts that show the failure. No production PII.
validations:
required: false
- type: textarea
id: context
attributes:
label: Additional context
description: Frequency, scale (message/conclusion counts), related issues, workarounds.
validations:
required: false