## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip uses a frozen pnpm lockfile to create the same dependency
graph for each build.
> - The Claude local adapter now uses
`@agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp` version 0.73.0.
> - The root patch configuration contains a patch for version 0.73.0.
> - The committed lockfile did not contain the matching patch record.
> - A frozen install rejected this mismatch and stopped the master
deployment.
> - This pull request regenerates only `pnpm-lock.yaml` from the current
master manifests.
> - The change makes the frozen install valid again.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #12730
**What happened?**
The master lockfile did not match the current patched dependency
configuration.
**Expected behavior**
The frozen install must accept the lockfile on master.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Extract a clean archive of master.
2. Run `NODE_ENV=development CI=true pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
--force`.
3. Observe that pnpm rejects the stale lockfile.
**Paperclip version or commit**
`b1f4910ee57789c7045705a38c31ca34704f3575`
**Deployment mode**
Self-hosted server.
**Installation method**
Built from source with pnpm.
## What Changed
- Added the patch record for
`@agentclientprotocol/claude-agent-acp@0.73.0`.
- Updated the Claude local adapter lock entry to version 0.73.0.
- Added the matching transitive Claude agent SDK lock entries.
## Verification
- `git diff --check` passes.
- A clean archive of commit `236767cdd1832575fe93ea50f50df2890fb2bf1f`
accepts the frozen lockfile.
- `NODE_ENV=development CI=true pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --force`
completes with exit code 0 in that archive.
- Latest-head GitHub checks are green (32/32 success, neutral, or
skipped).
- Greptile passed the same head at 5/5 with zero unresolved threads.
## Risks
- Risk is low because pnpm generated the only changed file.
- The lockfile now records the dependency version that the manifests
already require.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex with a GPT-5 family model produced this change. The runtime
does not expose the exact deployment ID or context size. The model used
high reasoning and shell execution.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used with the available version and
capability details
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have linked the related public pull request with `Refs #`
- [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues
or links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id
- [x] I have run the required local verification and it passes
- [x] Tests do not need source changes for this generated lockfile
correction
- [x] Documentation does not need changes because behavior and commands
are unchanged
- [x] I have considered and documented the risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile has no open P2 findings, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before merge
Co-authored-by: lockfile-bot <lockfile-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Dotta
github-actions[bot]