paperclip/packages/paperclip-runner/docs/capability-authorization-an...

4.6 KiB

Capability Authorization and Exposure

Two decisions gate every capability: exposure (is the tool even offered to this actor?) and invocation (may this specific call proceed?). The authorization engine answers both, produces typed denials that carry no protected state, and redacts secrets before any observable boundary.

Sources: src/tools/capability-tool-authorization.ts, src/tools/capability-semantic-tool-runtime.ts, src/tools/capability-tool-bindings.ts.

Three-way classification

  • Control-plane-owned — a frozen operation list (checkout_task, release_task, select_work, route_wake, enforce_budget, append_audit_record, persist_run, replay_run, schedule_blocker_wake, reconcile_run). authorizeInvocation short-circuits these to outcome absent with reason control_plane_owned_operation. No agent tool exists for them and none can be invoked.
  • Always-agent tool — exposed to any actor whose task is active.
  • Optional-agent tool — exposed only when a grant unlocks it.

Exposure vs. invocation

  • computeVisibleTools() walks the whole catalog and records, per tool, an exposure of exposed or absent, returning only the allowed tools.
  • authorizeInvocation() re-evaluates at call time, producing allowed or denied.

Invocation is evaluated in order and fails at the first rule that rejects: policy-denied operation IDs; task-mode membership (operation_not_available_in_task_mode); role check (actor_role_not_authorized); policy-denied claims (required_claim_denied_by_policy); missing grants (required_claim_missing); read_secret_value requires policy.allowSecretValueAccess (secret_value_access_disabled); generic_api_request requires the escape hatch to be enabled and the target to be allowlisted (generic_escape_hatch_disabled / ..._target_denied); and the interaction-kind policy for request_human_input. Allowed calls carry the reason task_scoped_always_tool or required_claims_granted.

Self-approval is prohibited even with the role and an explicit decision claim.

How grants unlock optional tools

The actor's grants are the union of capabilityGrants (the actor's own) and scenarioGrants (seeded per scenario). An optional tool unlocks only when every entry in its requiredClaims is present in that union. Each authorization record stores the consideredClaims, grantedClaims, and missingClaims, so a denial explains exactly which claim was absent.

Typed denials carry no protected state

A denial is a CapabilityPolicyDenial: ok: false with an error.code of policy_denied, operation_absent, input_invalid, or operation_unsupported, the operationId, a generic reason, and the authorization record. It carries no fixture state and no protected payload. If the underlying mock operation throws, the runtime emits operation_unsupported with reason mock_operation_rejected and swallows the underlying error, so protected state cannot leak through an exception.

Secret redaction (the TASK-16909 rule)

Redaction is two layers:

  1. Model-only delivery is separated from every observable boundary. invoke() returns a redacted observableResult. The only path to an unredacted secret is invokeForModel(), which returns a frozen capsule whose toJSON() and default serialization always yield the redacted form; only an explicit readModelResult() opens the raw value. The capsule uses a distinct schema (paperclip.capability.model-tool-result.v1) so it cannot be assigned to an observable sink by mistake.
  2. Path redaction rules. read_secret_value redacts $.value to [SECRET_VALUE] across output, error, and authorization-record channels; generic_api_request redacts $.headers.authorization and $.headers.cookie to [REDACTED] across all channels. The scenario runner applies the same redaction again defensively at the explorer artifact boundary and injects only a placeholder secret value.

This is the security-gate outcome (TASK-16902) and its remediation (TASK-16909): a real secret value reaches the model surface only, never a trace, artifact, or browser view.

Running the tests

pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run \
  src/tools/capability-semantic-tools.test.ts

The "exposure and authorization" and "security policy" describes cover typed denials without protected state, model-only secret delivery, the self-approval prohibition, and the test-only, explicitly granted, allowlisted escape hatch.