scrapy/docs/topics/leaks.rst

284 lines
11 KiB
ReStructuredText

.. _topics-leaks:
======================
Debugging memory leaks
======================
In Scrapy, objects such as requests, responses and items have a finite
lifetime: they are created, used for a while and finally destroyed.
Of all those objects, the Request usually has the longest lifetime because it
waits in the Scheduler queue until it's time to process it. For more
information, see :ref:`topics-architecture`.
Because these Scrapy objects have a comparatively long lifetime, there is
always the risk of accumulating them in memory without releasing them properly
and thus causing what is known as a "memory leak".
To help debug memory leaks, Scrapy provides a built-in mechanism for tracking
object references called :ref:`trackref <topics-leaks-trackrefs>`, and you can
also use a third-party library called :ref:`muppy <topics-leaks-muppy>` for
more advanced memory debugging (see below for more information). Both
mechanisms must be used from the :ref:`Telnet Console <topics-telnetconsole>`.
Common causes of memory leaks
=============================
It happens quite often (sometimes by accident, sometimes on purpose) that the
Scrapy developer passes objects referenced in requests—for example, through the
:attr:`~scrapy.Request.cb_kwargs` or :attr:`~scrapy.Request.meta` attributes or
the request callback function—and that effectively ties the lifetime of those
referenced objects to the lifetime of the request. This is, by far, the most
common cause of memory leaks in Scrapy projects, and it can be quite difficult
for newcomers to debug.
In big projects, spiders are typically written by different people, and some of
those spiders could be "leaking" and thus affecting the rest of the
(well-written) spiders when they run concurrently, which, in turn, affects the
whole crawling process.
The leak could also come from a custom middleware, pipeline, or extension that
you wrote if you are not releasing the previously allocated resources properly.
For example, allocating resources on :signal:`spider_opened` but not releasing
them on :signal:`spider_closed` may cause problems if you're running
:ref:`multiple spiders per process <run-multiple-spiders>`.
Too Many Requests?
------------------
By default Scrapy keeps the request queue in memory; it includes
:class:`~scrapy.Request` objects and all objects referenced in request
attributes (for example, :attr:`~scrapy.Request.cb_kwargs` and
:attr:`~scrapy.Request.meta`). While this is not necessarily a leak, it can
consume a lot of memory. Enabling the :ref:`persistent job queue <topics-jobs>`
can help keep memory usage under control.
.. _topics-leaks-trackrefs:
Debugging memory leaks with ``trackref``
========================================
.. skip: start
:mod:`scrapy.utils.trackref` is a module provided by Scrapy to debug the most
common cases of memory leaks. It tracks the references to all live Request,
Response, Item, Spider and Selector objects.
You can enter the telnet console and inspect how many objects (of the classes
mentioned above) are currently alive using the ``prefs()`` function which is an
alias to the :func:`~scrapy.utils.trackref.print_live_refs` function:
.. code-block:: bash
telnet localhost 6023
.. code-block:: pycon
>>> prefs()
Live References
ExampleSpider 1 oldest: 15s ago
HtmlResponse 10 oldest: 1s ago
Selector 2 oldest: 0s ago
Request 878 oldest: 7s ago
As you can see, that report also shows the "age" of the oldest object in each
class. If you're running multiple spiders per process, chances are you can
figure out which spider is leaking by looking at the oldest request or
response. You can get the oldest object of each class using the
:func:`~scrapy.utils.trackref.get_oldest` function (from the telnet console).
Which objects are tracked?
--------------------------
``trackref`` tracks objects from these classes (and all their subclasses):
* :class:`scrapy.Request`
* :class:`scrapy.http.Response`
* :class:`scrapy.Item`
* :class:`scrapy.Selector`
* :class:`scrapy.Spider`
A real example
--------------
Let's see a concrete example of a hypothetical case of memory leaks.
Suppose we have some spider with a line similar to this one:
.. code-block:: python
return Request(
f"http://www.somenastyspider.com/product.php?pid={product_id}",
callback=self.parse,
cb_kwargs={"referer": response},
)
That line passes a response reference inside a request, which effectively ties
the response lifetime to the request's lifetime, and that will definitely cause
memory leaks.
Let's see how we can discover the cause (without knowing it
a priori, of course) by using the ``trackref`` tool.
After the crawler is running for a few minutes and we notice its memory usage
has grown a lot, we can enter its telnet console and check the live
references:
.. code-block:: pycon
>>> prefs()
Live References
SomenastySpider 1 oldest: 15s ago
HtmlResponse 3890 oldest: 265s ago
Selector 2 oldest: 0s ago
Request 3878 oldest: 250s ago
The fact that there are so many live responses (and that they're so old) is
definitely suspicious, as responses should have a relatively short lifetime
compared to requests. The number of responses is similar to the number of
requests, so it looks like they are tied in some way. We can now check the code
of the spider to discover the line that is generating the leaks (passing
response references inside requests).
Sometimes extra information about live objects can be helpful.
Let's check the oldest response:
.. code-block:: pycon
>>> from scrapy.utils.trackref import get_oldest
>>> r = get_oldest("HtmlResponse")
>>> r.url
'http://www.somenastyspider.com/product.php?pid=123'
If you want to iterate over all objects instead of getting only the oldest one,
you can use the :func:`scrapy.utils.trackref.iter_all` function:
.. code-block:: pycon
>>> from scrapy.utils.trackref import iter_all
>>> [r.url for r in iter_all("HtmlResponse")]
['http://www.somenastyspider.com/product.php?pid=123',
'http://www.somenastyspider.com/product.php?pid=584',
...]
Too many spiders?
-----------------
If your project has too many spiders executed in parallel, the output of
``prefs()`` can be difficult to read. For this reason, that function has an
``ignore`` argument that you can use to omit a particular class (and all its
subclasses). For example, this won't show any live references to spiders:
.. code-block:: pycon
>>> from scrapy.spiders import Spider
>>> prefs(ignore=Spider)
.. module:: scrapy.utils.trackref
:synopsis: Track references of live objects
scrapy.utils.trackref module
----------------------------
Here are the functions available in the :mod:`~scrapy.utils.trackref` module.
.. autoclass:: object_ref
.. autofunction:: print_live_refs(ignore=NoneType)
.. autofunction:: get_oldest
.. autofunction:: iter_all
.. skip: end
.. _topics-leaks-muppy:
Debugging memory leaks with muppy
=================================
``trackref`` provides a convenient mechanism for tracking down memory leaks,
but it only keeps track of the objects that are more likely to cause them.
However, sometimes leaks come from other (more or less obscure) objects. If
that happens and you can't find your leaks using ``trackref``, you still have
another resource: the muppy library.
muppy is available as part of `Pympler`_.
.. _Pympler: https://pypi.org/project/Pympler/
If you use ``pip``, you can install muppy with the following command::
pip install Pympler
Here's an example that shows all Python objects available in the heap using
muppy:
.. skip: start
.. code-block:: pycon
>>> from pympler import muppy
>>> all_objects = muppy.get_objects()
>>> len(all_objects)
28667
>>> from pympler import summary
>>> suml = summary.summarize(all_objects)
>>> summary.print_(suml)
types | # objects | total size
==================================== | =========== | ============
<class 'str | 9822 | 1.10 MB
<class 'dict | 1658 | 856.62 KB
<class 'type | 436 | 443.60 KB
<class 'code | 2974 | 419.56 KB
<class '_io.BufferedWriter | 2 | 256.34 KB
<class 'set | 420 | 159.88 KB
<class '_io.BufferedReader | 1 | 128.17 KB
<class 'wrapper_descriptor | 1130 | 88.28 KB
<class 'tuple | 1304 | 86.57 KB
<class 'weakref | 1013 | 79.14 KB
<class 'builtin_function_or_method | 958 | 67.36 KB
<class 'method_descriptor | 865 | 60.82 KB
<class 'abc.ABCMeta | 62 | 59.96 KB
<class 'list | 446 | 58.52 KB
<class 'int | 1425 | 43.20 KB
.. skip: end
For more information about muppy, refer to the `muppy documentation`_.
.. _muppy documentation: https://pythonhosted.org/Pympler/muppy.html
.. _topics-leaks-without-leaks:
Leaks without leaks
===================
Sometimes you may notice that the memory usage of your Scrapy process only
increases and never decreases. Unfortunately, this could happen even though
neither Scrapy nor your project are leaking memory. This is due to a
not-so-well-known problem in Python, which may not return released memory to
the operating system in some cases. For more information on this issue see:
* `Python Memory Management <https://www.evanjones.ca/python-memory.html>`_
* `Python Memory Management Part 2 <https://www.evanjones.ca/python-memory-part2.html>`_
* `Python Memory Management Part 3 <https://www.evanjones.ca/python-memory-part3.html>`_
The improvements proposed by Evan Jones, which are detailed in `this paper`_,
got merged in Python 2.5, but this only reduces the problem, it doesn't fix it
completely. To quote the paper:
*Unfortunately, this patch can only free an arena if there are no more
objects allocated in it anymore. This means that fragmentation is a large
issue. An application could have many megabytes of free memory, scattered
throughout all the arenas, but it will be unable to free any of it. This is
a problem experienced by all memory allocators. The only way to solve it is
to move to a compacting garbage collector, which is able to move objects in
memory. This would require significant changes to the Python interpreter.*
.. _this paper: https://www.evanjones.ca/memoryallocator/
To keep memory consumption reasonable, you can split the job into several
smaller jobs or enable the :ref:`persistent job queue <topics-jobs>` and stop
and start the spider from time to time.